On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:30:48AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 29/06/15 at 16:47 +0000, Bart Martens wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +0000, Bart Martens wrote: > > > > It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from > > > > mole.watch. So I > > > > don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would even run uscan. > > > > > > Because the UDD implementation predates a working mole.watch. > > > > Really? > > > > > DEHS died, > > > then there was nothing to replace it, and UDD's implementation was > > > created. Then someone duplicated it in mole. > > > > The implementation in mole was already there when I added watch-requeue and > > sepwatch, and I've heard about the implementation in UDD only very recently. > > The UDD implementation was added in > 62f88c50d064150ecc22e4397fce06388caccddb, from July 1st, 2012. > At that point, I don't think that there was any other working > implementation (everybody was using DEHS until it died).
Mole's implementation was added a year earlier: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/mole/worker/watch-worker?view=log http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/mole/worker/watch.conf?view=log > > > > Given that the UDD implementation works, I have no interest in switching > > > to mole's. > > > > > > I'm not sure who are the current users of the mole implementation, > > > > The mole implementation feeds PTS and DDPO. What does the UDD > > implementation > > feed? > > I don't know. Me neither. > Given that it's easy to get data out of UDD (either > directly using SQL, With mole.watch it's SQL as well. > or through json dumps), I don't keep track of users > of UDD's data. I did the reverse: I looked at the code of the "users" PTS and DDPO and found that uscan was being called by mole. > > Hypothetically, how would UDD's get mole's watch data? Hypothetically, UDD could call udd-dehs or execute the SQL query on mole.watch. http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/cgi-bin/udd-dehs?revision=3039&view=markup > > How different is mole's data schema from UDD's? I guess you already have access to UDD's data schema. Can you access mole.watch with what you read in udd-dehs? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150630174744.ga24...@master.debian.org
