On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:15:49PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 30/06/15 at 17:47 +0000, Bart Martens wrote: > > > How different is mole's data schema from UDD's? > > > > I guess you already have access to UDD's data schema. Can you access > > mole.watch > > with what you read in udd-dehs? > > It seems that udd-dehs doesn't keep track of both unstable and > experimental. Some packages track different branches and different > suites, and thus have different watch files.
Good point. I see that mole.watch contains more info than udd-dehs extracts, so a variant of udd-dehs could extract more. > > Also, I'm surprised that the executable is named > 'uscan-without-pgpsigurlmangle'. Does it mean that it doesn't check PGP > signatures even when a signing key is provided? That sounds like a bad > idea. That sounds worse than it is. We've been fine without pgpsigurlmangle for many years, and most watch files still don't have pgpsigurlmangle. Adapting watch-worker to extract the key as well is certainly worth considering. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150630194103.gb24...@master.debian.org
