On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:01:07PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> This link is now there. I guess the problem is that that page is not
> generated as often as the DDPO is updated.
The pages are updated daily at 00:09 UTC, fwiw.
> Anthony, would it be possible to generate that page when a new pa
Interesting Mail-Followup-To: setting...
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:27:24AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > My old package 'ipac' is only in oldstable now. There are 8 open bug
> > > > reports. Is it appropriate for me to close them?
> Hm, but just plainly closing is also not right.
Mmm, I wo
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:49:50AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Anthony Towns [2004-03-16 13:51]:
> > > > But it is difficult for me(currently) to maintain two versions of
> > > > mozilla.
> > > > So, I'll orphan it...
> > > Is anyone in
for me(currently) to maintain two versions of
> > mozilla.
> > So, I'll orphan it...
> Is anyone interested in maintaining a mozilla-snapshot package in
> experimental?
Err, presumably it should just be called "mozilla" in that case?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Town
...
There's still http://bugs.debian.org/~ajt/oldbugs.html too, fwiw.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
pgpp8YJKkEDYb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
celebrate their birthday is 14th July,
thanks mainly to LaMont Jones and hppa, with a little over 100 bugs
still open since 14/07/2001... Next best is 26th March with 69, which
looks like it has Adam Heath and /usr/share/doc to thank.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROT
perl 5.8 update.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:13:32PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > Do you really think that a "good attitude" is to continually and
> > > > repeatedly criticise the people doing the wor
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:35:18PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:32:06AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Do you really think that a "good attitude" is to continually and
> > repeatedly criticise the people doing the work of getting the relea
ticise
then hide behind some trite "Thanks to people behind ftpmaster and Anthony
for doing this huge job." Instead, help when you can, and be supportive
when you can't.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don
uld be
done about them. When it is, you'll all know. Until it is, you won't
know. In the mean time, have a drink or write some code, don't whine,
bitch and moan.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak fo
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:03:24AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > And, just to expound upon that before we drop further into the usual
> > sort of self-righteousness these threads evoke, you do _not_ know
> > what you're talking about at a
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 12:49:33AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > Everyone's an expert.
> You know, your attitude is really not helpful.
And, after replying to this in private, I discover Thomas is _still_ Cc'ing
me on mailing list messag
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:40:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:05:46AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 May 2002, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > > What would you do if you would get more mail you'd have to reply to
> > &g
ake clear (hopefully) carefully and politely tried to
> show in a mail to debian-private it really seems that ftpmaster [...]
> are obviousely overloaded.
Everyone's an expert.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> My vote for archiving those software you decide to remove to
All removed packages are kept in /org/ftp.debian.org/morgue/rhona/
on auric (and a similar directory on pandora) as disk space permits.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony To
om scratch with one of
> those packages without debconf.
Then when someone comes around with an ITP, you can mail them your diffs
and everyone can be happy.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save m
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:13:30AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Further, it's still not clear why these packages should be kept in sid,
> > if they aren't suitable for woody and no one is interested in
> > maintaining
urther, it's still not clear why these packages should be kept in sid,
if they aren't suitable for woody and no one is interested in maintaining
them.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone s
s of boot-floppies on alpha (which haven't been built since
last November), or packages like apache, slapd, pcmcia-cs, bison, nscd,
and so on.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail p
s fixed, but there aren't that many packages we can't
release without.
The two serious bugs against glibc (130922, 131216) and the grave bug
against base-passwd (130735) fall squarely into the latter category,
as do bugs against the other base and standard packages; bugs against
mo
ng these in batches of 50 or so, announcing them to
-devel-announce once a week so people can look through them and
claim them if they want them
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save m
con you into fixing some real bugs
as well as doing that little cleanup. Go on, fall for it. You know you
want to.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
The daffod
ake into account packages having different distributions
of bugs).
But, shrug, whatever.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
"Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. G
ays old)
> - 68245: MuPAD (1638 days old)
> - 68256: TinyMUSH (1638 days old)
Heh.
You might want to consider a 730 (or even 1460) day limit for RFP's.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myse
ndow should be shortened.
Might it be worth setting O: bugs to be severity "important" to make it
a bit easier to spot them?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
ugs would work pretty well too (there're a whole bunch
that've been open for months, some for over a year).
My count says there're only about 40 RC "standard" bugs, although it
underestimates by a bit.
Of course, if you want to look at normal bugs too...
Cheers,
aj
--
An
copyright etc, installs okay, someone willing
to take some care and at least get it removed from any arches where it
doesn't build anymore.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mai
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> * #89881: swi-prolog: bus error during build on sparc
>Package: swi-prolog; Severity: serious; Reported by: Ben Collins
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 214 days old.
> * #99032: can't build on arm
>Package: swi-
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 09:39:03AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:58:37PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > http://standard.debian.net/ is now available showing all bugs in
> > > standard. 8
ous
tetex-base 111284 open serious
tetex-base 111289 open serious
wvdial 97298 open serious
xfonts-biznet-iso-8859-2 108911 open grave
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mai
some
"important" bugs, but the above bugs are the most important, generally
speaking.
For those who're willing to poke around a bit, I'm generating the lists
of bugs and packages from stuff in auric:~ajt/basebugs/.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <htt
Hi guys,
Could we please get a pcre3 upload (NMU or not) to fix the above three
bugs "today" please?
TIA.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:48:43PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Anthony Towns wrote:
> > What's being done to fix this bug? When will it be fixed? Etc?
> Waiting for upstream.
That sounds an awful lot like "nothing" and "no idea", respect
Fix one bug, another gets created. Great.
What's being done to fix this bug? When will it be fixed? Etc?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase i
pload anyway, it'll be added
into the archive over the top of the QA upload, so no harm done.
Having QA being able to act as quickly as possible to fix RC bugs in
the area we're working on atm would be very helpful as far as getting
the release out in as timely a manner as possible.
Cheer
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:37:22PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Could someone please upload a new modutils to fix Bug#106933? The
> > explanation in the report appears to answer Wichert's request for
> > moreinfo.
> How nice of
Hi,
Could someone please upload a new modutils to fix Bug#106933? The
explanation in the report appears to answer Wichert's request for
moreinfo.
TIA.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save m
Hi,
Can someone please upload an exim that fixes 108285? (exim in testing is
broken with upgrades from potato, exim in unstable is broken wrt ipv6)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG sign
ude some task- packages. Can be fixed after
base freeze.
--> Freeze unaffected for the moment
modutils and exim probably should be NMUed by QA, apt appears to just
need a maintainer upload, db2 needs some investigation and a fix to be
worked out (urgently), and con
onsole-data support for Sparc is weak. Fix in incoming that
should resolve #102500, and should allow installers to work
around #85128; will not delay freeze.
Only the apt and db2 problems of those listed above seem likely to be
problematic.
Cheers,
aj
--
Antho
ly for arches where there's no problem with CPU time (hi Ben :).
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 11:56:39AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Currently open RC bugs against base packages are: (by source package)
> > Dima Barsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cyrus-sasl 94692 open serious [needs update to work on hppa]
> Can you please tell me how you define "base packages
on power3]
glibc 101308 open serious [doesn't build on m68k]
glibc 103932 open critical [user error?]
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hfsutils 94099 open serious [doesn't autobuild]
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ifupdown 103868 open seriou
merge 97188 98290
severity 97188 grave
thanks
Hi Guys,
pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 in unstable doesn't work with the 2.2.19 kernel-image
in unstable, which means boot-floppies can't support PCMCIA devices. Could
some please do a rebuild ASAP. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Tow
this
type these days... ()
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot percei
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:19:47AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> (An additional problem is that the auric's recent problems (not master's,
> this is a whole new set from the last 24 hours or so) have screwed up both
> testing and the pool in general to an unknown degree. Dep
e news as it comes to
hand.)
Cheers,
(aj)
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not und
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:29:49PM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:18:21AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > >A problem I'm commonly finding with testing (the distribution, not
> > > the process) is that
ly" ?
This happens only when I break things (twice now, once this week, once
some months ago), or when testing decides to allow some things to break
in favour of fixing other things (at least as many packages have to get
fixed as break).
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:27:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So, volunteers?
A particularly good place for someone to start would be writing a
script to help find packages that depend on old libraries, running it,
and passing the output on to the autobuilders.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony To
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 04:11:49PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For the freeze to work well, there are two separate QA tasks that need
> to be done: (1) fixing RC bugs before the packages they apply to freeze,
> and (2) improving packages' policy compliance and overall consistency.
can get flames that you mustn't
> file bugs... :-(
Heaven forbid that policy could possibly be wrong. If we had perfect rules
for everything, we'd have written a program to maintain Debian for us and
we'd all be on permanent holiday. As it is, take everything you see with a
grai
install build-essential and any named build-dependencies then
seeing what breaks. Usually, anyway. You can use [0] to see what
the autobuilders would use if you don't specify any build-deps.
So anyway, if people can maybe direct some of their QA energies along
those lines, I'm
Uh, the base bugs list is broken: at the very least it includes a couple
of closed RC dpkg bugs... Any chance of this getting fixed?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail pr
her.
Bug 81648 is *really* straightforward to fix. Can someone please just
do it?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange fo
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:35:03PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Quoting Anthony Towns :
> > + roxen-fonts-iso8859-2 uploaded 399 days ago, out of date by
> > + roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 uploaded 399 days ago, out of date by
> These are fonts. Why should they be 'out of d
doesn't build on sparc/arm, see 94514
+ axe uploaded 125 days ago, out of date by 115 days!
doesn't build on sparc, no bug filed
+ atari800 uploaded 125 days ago, out of date by 115 days!
depends on svgalibg1 on m68k; svgalib isn't supported on anything
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:56:28PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > The other question that popped up is "what's holding up packages in
> > unstable and what can QA do to help that?"
> Go through the update_excuses list, find a
t usually a waste of time.
I'm treating debian-testing as a group that finds problems and can judge
how functional or buggy the distribution is, and debian-qa as a group
that fixes problems and has tools and procedures to try to stop them
reoccuring. Both these things really come under the
example probably isn't too constructive). rm it by
hand in the postrm on purge.
* if it is meant to be changed by hand
- put it in /etc, mark it as a conffile; add a symlink from
/var if necessary
Depends what books.bin actually is t
now work, with and without &repeatmerged=no and/or &archive=yes. Packages
that don't actually exist are listed as having a maintainer "(unknown)". I
suspect y'all can work out the rest.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/
enough
to maintain it.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and working code.&
On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 03:08:20AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> libc4 is still listed as withdrawn. There are discussions about removing
> libc5 from Debian. Isn't it time to remove libc4 from project/orphaned ?
Why?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http:/
probably remained from slink - I occasionally add own entries to
> /etc/services so do not upgrade the file every time. But I suggest you check
> cucipop.postinst then. It's all stuffed with 'pop-3' strings. There's still
> some inconsistency there. I send Cc:
out better than I expected. The only two that I
deleted were contrib/ programs depending on pine/qmail/other things, all
the rest seem to actually be uninstallable.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save mys
On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 05:13:55AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So Guy, would you be willing to apply this patch? Unfortunately, I don't
> seem to be able to compile bash properly (the libc5 stuff dies horrible
> deaths if I don't comment it out), so I can't offer to make
problems.
Jim, does all that sound reasonable to you? Would you like to make a
proper fix for this sometime soonish, or would you rather an NMU?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted m
changing bash.
But read on anyway...
On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 09:18:17AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 02:10:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Note that the first maintainer script after "remove /bin/sh" is the
> > postinst -- adding the link in
On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 12:22:37PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Furthermore, Essential packages are always immediately configured by Apt,
> > so we don't have an issue there either.
> That means we're dropping support for all non-APT dse
> removed.
Note that current behaviour is that the preinst fails if bash somehow gets
removed. (dpkg --force-remove-essential --force-depends --remove bash;
dpkg -i bash_2.02.1-1.7_i386.deb # does work with the previous patch,
however)
Does this sound satisfactory?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns
10:00:00 1970
+++ bash-2.02.1-1.7/debian/bash.preinst.c Sat Aug 28 01:06:37 1999
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/* Copyright (c) 1999 Anthony Towns
+ *
+ * You may freely use, distribute, and modify this program.
+ */
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+int main(void) {
+pid_t child;
+
+
a should be withdrawn? If none,
do we particularly want to withdraw any, or should we just more or less
let -qa handle all of them until they're unhappy.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP e
oes not obey SIGWINCH.
> OK, I suppose this is a real bug :-)
> #19171: 'w' IDLE time not consistent
> yeah, that sucks
> #21473: procps no longer has colours
> sick
And these are not-a-fixable-bug one way or another.
FWIW, etc.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL
probably more appropriate on -admintool
(as in, configuration management), or -dpkg (as in, where it's probably
best implemented).
YMMV, FWIW, etc.
Cheers,
aj
[0] http://master.debian.org/~branden/xsf.html
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don&
be improved in
the future, which is like changing the documentation of a program, but
unlike changing it's name.
IMHO.
Cheers,
aj, who has fond recollections of Santiago giving him advice on how to use
the BTS early last year when he was a complete newbie :)
--
Anthony Towns <[EMA
On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 04:28:42PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 01:41:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Nope, 5800. 5812 to be exact. Check
> > http://master.debian.org/~ajt/graph.png
> > It ignores fixed, close
and 5 against bash. Then a handful of 4's, a number of 3's lots of 2's and
heaps of 1's.
Well. What a pointless set of statistics *that* was.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save mys
t; If there is, it is recorded in the BTS, at bugs.debian.org/.
> Maintainers should know how to use the BTS.
But some of them are too busy to get around to it.
It's good to play nice, even if the other guy doesn't deserve it,
sometimes.
Cheers,
aj
[0] 5800 and *still* skyrocketting. wt
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 06:50:36PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I've never had to say `I'm from debian-qa' when I've tried fixing bugs,
> > or asked if maintainers would like me to do an NMU, and my own key is
> > good enough wh
The only thing that's special about -qa people is that we're busybodies
who'd like to fix other peoples bugs. But just sending a message `Hi,
mind if I do an NMU' is probably more evidence of that than a valid PGP
signature is anyway.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 10:49:52PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:14:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >Package: tkman
> >Maintainer: Debian QA Group
> >[ADOPT] Adopted by Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >2
g conffiles in bug reports
Package: isapnptools
Maintainer: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
8483 Bug in isapnptools Version: 1.9-1
Package: kernel-source-2.0.33
Maintainer: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
8527 kernel-source-2.0.29: Tosh Tecra 730 won't boot
7;ve got some
more details to add to the description on the page, please mail me
with a note to add to it.
[1] Especially considering http://master.debian.org/~ajt/graph.png .
*sigh*
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for
tion:
> ---
> Scan the bug tracking system for bugs older than 3 months that are
> fixable and provide patches to the debian maintainers (and
> eventually also to the upstream maintainers).
Older than two years is enough of a stress at the moment. :)
See http://master
m (Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
7849 ncurses various bugs
Old bugs againt fdutils (Anthony Fok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
7893 fdformat causes my floppy parameters to be lost
Old bugs againt cvs (Tom Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED
is no changelog.Debian.gz
[STRATEGY] Michael is working on this
Old bugs againt libdb2-dev:
7148 24 libdb-dev puts include file in wrong place
Old bugs againt ncftp:
7189 24 ncftp can't do recursive get
Old bugs againt kaffe:
7346 24 kaffe has divert problem
Old bugs againt xaw3
cts of Debian
policy as well as some checks for common errors.
See also http://www.debian.org/lintian/ . (there are currently 2822
lintian errors, and 5840 lintian warnings against debs in the archive)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I
perl, and have poked at numerous
> others. bash, python, scheme, java I think I'm capable of hunting down
> upstream bugs.
Ditto, FWIW.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encry
D/
would be good. Links to proposed new things might be helpful too, like
the FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/), the LSB (http://www.linuxbase.org/)
and PAM or PNIAM (?).
Emailing the -qa list or similar every now and then with interesting lintian
reports and suchlike might be useful too.
Ch
90 matches
Mail list logo
