On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:13:32PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > > Do you really think that a "good attitude" is to continually and > > > > repeatedly criticise the people doing the work of getting the release > > > > out > > > This work is not visible. > > Not everybody knows everything that happens. Sorry, but that's just the > > way things are. If you're assuming that nothing's happening just because > > you're not intimately aware of it, it's _you_ that's being irrational. > For two weeks? Surely there's been time during this time to tell everyone > that something's being done?!
I indicated that all this stuff was being worked on in my last post to -devel-announce. The grammar might've sucked, and the estimate of when it might be active was off, but nevertheless. If I had a better estimate, or if anything useful had changed, I might post. But there isn't any news. Of course, I could post "Hey, my last estimate didn't pan out either!" and see if that would get slashdotted too, but that doesn't sound like particularly much fun either. > > (More flames. What a surprise.) > If you take all criticism as flaming. I take being called irrational as flaming, yeah. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
pgpYPHyzqeqvh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
