On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 04:14:53AM +0100, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > On Fri, 2000-02-11 at 20:47:50, Michael-John Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 11:01:02AM +0100, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote: > > > pop-3\t\tstream\ttcp\tnowait\tcyrus\t/usr/sbin/tcpd\t/usr/sbin/pop3d > > I think there's a problem with your /etc/services - my machines have a pop3 > > service but not a pop-3 one.
They should have a pop-3 one --- pop-3 is what it's been forever; pop3 is the official IANA name for it, but that's only been in /etc/services since netbase 3.16-1. From /etc/services: pop3 110/tcp pop-3 # POP version 3 pop3 110/udp pop-3 Note that having pop-3 after 110/tcp just means it's an alias for the port name. > You're right, thanks. Bastards must have changed it lately ;-) This > probably remained from slink - I occasionally add own entries to > /etc/services so do not upgrade the file every time. But I suggest you check > cucipop.postinst then. It's all stuffed with 'pop-3' strings. There's still > some inconsistency there. I send Cc: to cucipop maintainer then. HTH. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG encrypted mail preferred. ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.'' -- Linus Torvalds
pgpFfhNXF44Gd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
