On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:02:46AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote: > I would say, without such a survey taking place, that for each package in > non-free, there is at least one person who: > * has stated agreement with the DSC and DFSG > * uses the package, or at least believes others do > * feels strongly about the package enough to package and maintain it
Actually, that's not true: the following non-free i386 packages have debian-qa
listed as the maintainer:
abuse-sfx
bsdgames-nonfree
chimera
cthugha
cucipop
cxhextris
filters-nonfree
gravitywars
guile-scsh
imgstar
mcvert
xmap-dmotif
xmap-smotif
xtrojka
Maybe we should move all these to project/orphaned? There doesn't seem
much point keeping non-free stuff around if no one's interested enough
to maintain it.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
-- Dave Clark
pgp64EwHdY6TA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
