On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 05:13:55AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > So Guy, would you be willing to apply this patch? Unfortunately, I don't > seem to be able to compile bash properly (the libc5 stuff dies horrible > deaths if I don't comment it out), so I can't offer to make an NMU, but > hopefully someone else on the -qa list would be able to step forward and > do so in the next couple of weeks if you're too busy.
It's been a couple of weeks. Could someone from -qa make an NMU incorporating the preinst-from-script-to-binary change? The full patch (which removed the /bin/sh link, and replaced it in the postinst, which isn't desirable) is in the -qa list archives, and in the logs for the applicable RC bugs for bash (#43050, #43096, #36016). Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred. ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.'' -- Linus Torvalds
pgpSDDJpPPhfZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
