This is a nice coincidence, because I just installed Debian Sid
('unstable') on my home workstation.
I am also a convinced Debian user, and all the servers and workstations
I administrate are Debian Woody ('stable'). Now, recently, I have seen
myself forced to install more and more backported pac
Hi,
Vincent Bernat a écrit:
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 23 juillet 2003, vers 21:47,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
First what is the version of the firmware of your card ?
Heu...I don't know. I bought this card recently, and recieve it today :-)
It's a classic
Hi,
Sven Luther writes:
> The benh tree is also packaged for debian, but not by me, and maybe
> not as an official package, and contain more pmac specific stuff.
To be precise, the differences between the vanilla kernel and Ben's
tree are packaged as kernel-patch-benh, with minimal changes to en
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 18:00:08 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i was busy at linuxtag/debconf this last days, and i did not have
> > very much time to read the lists, and thus i missed this one, but
> > anyway, if you find a bug, you should fill
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 23 juillet 2003, vers 21:47,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> I'm posting here because I didn't find anything on google/linux...
[Problem with an airport card]
First what is the version of the firmware of your card ?
--
#define BB_STAT2_TMP_
Hi
I'm posting here because I didn't find anything on google/linux...
My problem is :
I'm configuring a wireless router [essid : ploumploum ]. The router
configuration menu give me the choice between many possibles security
settings, and I want to use my ibook with this router, with a (not
r
=
http://narins.net
There are better options than war.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
thanks for all the pointers--
dylan
on 03.7.18 9:26 PM, Rogério Brito at [EMAIL PROTECTED] was reported to have
writen:
> On Jul 18 2003, dylan wrote:
>> using debian stable for the last year now... and am still stuck with
>> mozilla 1.0.0 .. are there any other apt-sources that i can add such
>
> > > False, Dan told me to use the linuxppc_2_4 tree, and that someone else
> > > was packaging the benh tree. I don't know who though, and probably it is
> > > not an official package.
> >
> > What is the difference between linuxppc_2_4 and benh-stable? Not much, I'd
> > hope ...
>
> I don't real
Hi,
I am somewhat new to Linux low-level development. I have developed for
other UNIX systems before, and also for Windows NT and for JavaCard
compatible smartcards.
I have used (and enjoyed) Debian for a long time as a Linux user and for
web development. Getting into low-level development,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:33:48PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 18:00:08 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i was busy at linuxtag/debconf this last days, and i did not have
> > very much time to read the lists, and thus i missed this one, but
> > anyway, if you find a b
> > You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is based
> > on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no
> > kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package (kernel-image-2.4.21-newpmac would be
> > impossible without Bens work). For all practical purpose the two would be
> > identical
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:39:33PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is based
> > > on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no
> > > kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package (kernel-image-2.4.21-newpmac would be
> > > impossible wit
> > You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is based
> > on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no
> > kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package (kernel-image-2.4.21-newpmac would be
> > impossible without Bens work). For all practical purpose the two would be
> > identical
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 18:00:08 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, i was busy at linuxtag/debconf this last days, and i did not have
> very much time to read the lists, and thus i missed this one, but
> anyway, if you find a bug, you should fill a bug report, and not expect
> the maintainer to read
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy
> > kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc package but no kernel-image-2.4.21-benh
> > package in Debian?
>
> You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is base
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:31:33AM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 15:41:35 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:53:48PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy
> > > kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc packa
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 15:41:35 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:53:48PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy
> > kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc package but no kernel-image-2.4.21-benh
> > package in Debian?
>
> Because it
> If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy
> kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc package but no kernel-image-2.4.21-benh
> package in Debian?
You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is based
on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no
kernel-image-2.4.21-b
Can you try putting the 2.4.20 aic7xxx driver into 2.4.21
and let me know if that fixes it ? Also, The oops log is
rather useless with the System.map since you are using the
driver as a module, it's symbols aren't in System.map,
either use insmod -m and send me that output or run the
oops through k
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:53:48PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 14:02:03 +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Not having tried to compile any recent Linus kernel on powerpc or
> > elsewhere, I might be wrong, but from my experience it's always been the
> > case that differen
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 14:59, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
>
> Can "UseFBDev" be disabled using the "ati" driver?
No, not using the r128 driver (which you're actually using).
> Do you think this would make a noticeable difference in performance?
No.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 14:02:03 +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Not having tried to compile any recent Linus kernel on powerpc or
> elsewhere, I might be wrong, but from my experience it's always been the
> case that different architectures each had their own development trees and
> their own (rat
Michel Dänzer escribio el 22/07/03 23:03:
Using the same window manager etc. ? 2D acceleration (in particular
'Screen to screen bit blits') is active, isn't it?
As soon as it is posible for me, I will install Mandrake 9.1 PowerPC
again, compile new feelings, and get their X config and logs.
On Wed, 2003-07-23 14:22:50 +0200, STOJICEVIC E InfoEdpRsa <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
^^^
That could have been somewhat better...
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a freshly installed debian but i cant find the ~ key ?!
>
> D
Hi,
I'm new here and in the ppc world ...
I have a freshly installed debian but i cant find the ~ key ?!
Does someone know if a key map of the keyboard is available somewhere ?
Thanks,
--
. ''`. E d i S T O J I C E V I C
(\___/)
: :' : http://www.debianworld.org
(='.'=)
`. `~' GPG: C
Thanks to Timothy Brown for solving the problem for me.
crt> 1) From dmesg
crt> hda: TOSHIBA MK3017GAS, ATA DISK drive
crt> hdb: TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-R2102, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
tb>Ok, so /dev/hdb is the CD drive. Funny that it's on the same bus.
tb>*shrug* I've got a tibook.
tb>Try `eject /dev
Kent West wrote:
Steven Schlansker wrote:
How do you reconfigure the network interfaces, for example to use
static addresses instead of DHCP?
Thanks,.
Steven
Edit /etc/network/interfaces. See "man interfaces" for details. Here's
an example:
# /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration fil
28 matches
Mail list logo
