On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:48:18PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy > > kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc package but no kernel-image-2.4.21-benh > > package in Debian? > > You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is based > on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no > kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package (kernel-image-2.4.21-newpmac would be > impossible without Bens work). For all practical purpose the two would be > identical (right, Sven?).
False, Dan told me to use the linuxppc_2_4 tree, and that someone else was packaging the benh tree. I don't know who though, and probably it is not an official package. Friendly, Sven Luther
