On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 14:02:03 +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Not having tried to compile any recent Linus kernel on powerpc or > elsewhere, I might be wrong, but from my experience it's always been the > case that different architectures each had their own development trees and > their own (rather small) development communities. It's always been up to > you to figure out where to get cutting edge kernel sources, and to deal > with problems yourself as they show up. Advice like 'better stick with > 2.4.21-benh' might just mean that - unless you want to spend your time > fixing patch rejects or compile errors and risk kernel crashes, just use > the stable powerpc branch (which happens to be maintained by Ben).
If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc package but no kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package in Debian? -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100% validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
