> If the 2.4.21-benh kernel is so good, why is there a buggy
> kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc package but no kernel-image-2.4.21-benh
> package in Debian?
You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is based
on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no
kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package (kernel-image-2.4.21-newpmac would be
impossible without Bens work). For all practical purpose the two would be
identical (right, Sven?).
What's buggy about kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc? There's no BTS entry for
kernel-image-2.4.21-powerpc.
Michael
