On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:39:33PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > You can be sure that the Debian 2.4.21 kernel source (or patch) is based > > > on BenH's source tree. That explains why there's no > > > kernel-image-2.4.21-benh package (kernel-image-2.4.21-newpmac would be > > > impossible without Bens work). For all practical purpose the two would be > > > identical (right, Sven?). > > > > False, Dan told me to use the linuxppc_2_4 tree, and that someone else > > was packaging the benh tree. I don't know who though, and probably it is > > not an official package. > > What is the difference between linuxppc_2_4 and benh-stable? Not much, I'd > hope ...
I don't really know, Benjamin may respond to this one, maybe but even his response let me a bit confuse. linuxppc_2_4 is what get's advertized on penguinppc.org though. > There's kernel-patch-benh by Jens Schmalzing, how about using that to > build a kernel-image-benh package? Are you sure it doesn't do so already ? Have you not tried building from it ? Or doing a make-kpkg with it ? Friendly, Sven Luther