Bug#1100090: ITP: didder -- An extensive, fast, and accurate command-line image dithering tool.

2025-03-11 Thread Nicolas Peugnet
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicolas Peugnet * Package name: didder Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : makeworld * URL : https://github.com/makeworld-the-better-one/didder * License : GPL-3.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : An extensive,

Bug#1100112: ITP: golang-github-ashcrow-osrelease -- Go library/binary for parsing osrelease

2025-03-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: golang-github-ashcrow-osrelease Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Contact: Steve Milner * URL : https://github.com/ashcrow/osrelease * License : Apache-2.

General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do

2025-03-11 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, I'm on mobile, so only a quick reply: merging should be done with msgmerge as well — you need to call it twice, once with the po files from both branches, and once again with the pot file to fix all the location comments and fuzzy flags. Alternatively, you can define a filter in git to rem

Bug#1100127: ITP: python-enamlx -- Additional Qt Widgets for Enaml

2025-03-11 Thread Alexander Sulfrian
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alexander Sulfrian X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-enamlx Version : 0.6.4 Upstream Contact: Jairus Martin * URL : https://github.com/frmdstryr/enamlx/ * License : Expat Programming L

Bug#1100131: ITP: golang-github-eggsampler-acme -- Go client library implementation for ACME v2 (RFC8555)

2025-03-11 Thread Luca Soler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luca Soler X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org * Package name: golang-github-eggsampler-acme Version : 3.6.1-1 Upstream Author : Isaac Truscott * URL : https://github.com/eggsampler/acme * Lice

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 04:29:24PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: However if Debian dismiss those ideas, the argument that the fully free installer doesn't exist because "nobody is working on this, go create them and it will happen" does not seem valid to me. My reading is that these images doesn

Bug#1100128: ITP: golang-github-letsencrypt-borp -- Boulder's version of go-gorp/gorp

2025-03-11 Thread Luca Soler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luca Soler X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org * Package name: golang-github-letsencrypt-borp Version : 0.0~git20240620.a78493c-1 Upstream Author : Let's Encrypt (ISRG) * URL : https://github.c

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Charles Plessy writes: > On Fri, 2025-03-07 at 09:51 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> > I have prepared a stub for a "Gateway to NEW" on Salsa: >> > >> > https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team > > Le Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 06:00:55PM +0800, Maytham Alsudany a écrit : > >> Am I correct in assu

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:33:50PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: I wonder if we get a reply from the OP or if this was just an attempt to trigger a flame war. We will see... Yup. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1100099: ITP: python-elastcsearch8 -- Python client for Elasticsearch8

2025-03-11 Thread Karsten Schöke
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Karsten Schöke X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: python-elastcsearch8 Version : 8.17.2 Upstream Contact: Elastic Client Library Maintainers URL : https://github.com/elastic/elasti

Bug#1100121: ITP: golang-github-poy-onpar -- Parallel testing framework for Go

2025-03-11 Thread Luca Soler
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luca Soler X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org * Package name: golang-github-poy-onpar Version : 0.3.3-1 Upstream Author : Andrew Poydence * URL : https://github.com/poy/onpar * License

Bug#1100095: ITP: golang-github-tredoe-osutil -- access to operating system functionality

2025-03-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: golang-github-tredoe-osutil Version : 1.5.0 Upstream Contact: 2021-2024, Nathan Otterness * URL : https://github.com/tredoe/osutil * License : MPL

Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Wookey
On 2025-03-06 15:45 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote: Your question perhaps incorporates an underlying assumption that "two days", or "[less] than three or four weeks" is not slow. I'd like to challenge this assumption. I can ship code from a VCS host, for free, in a few seconds. Heck, I can eve

Bug#1100106: ITP: golang-go4-netipx -- extra stuff from inet.af/netaddr that didn't make it into Go's net/netip

2025-03-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: golang-go4-netipx Version : 0.0~git20231129.fdeea32 Upstream Contact: Brad Fitzpatrick * URL : https://github.com/go4org/netipx * License : BSD-3

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Geert Stappers writes: >> > We're not obligated to validate their questionable choices in buying >> > hardware that ships with non-free firmware >> >> There are a lot of competing priorities here, and it's the height of >> arrogance to be so certain that one's own opinion is best as to try to >>

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Philip Hands writes: > Hi Simon, > > Simon Josefsson writes: > >> While this may be fine to you it is not fine to me, and it is fine to >> disagree on that. > > If there were a method of building images that did not touch the > non-free components, I presume that would satisfy you. That sounds

General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do

2025-03-11 Thread Marc Haber
tl;dr: We need more docs about best practices to handle translations as a package maintainer My fellow developers, there are two things in being a DD that I truly despise. The one is keeping the machine readable debian/copyright up to date, the other is handling of translations, regardless of

Bug#1100098: ITP: golang-github-yalue-merged-fs -- compose Multiple Go Filesystems

2025-03-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: golang-github-yalue-merged-fs Version : 1.3.0 Upstream Contact: Nathan Otterness * URL : https://github.com/yalue/merged_fs * License : Expat Pr

Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 3/11/25 6:18 PM, Wookey wrote: Do we still even _need_ to pre-review the archive the same way we have been for 30 years? Could not post-review when actual problems are noted be sufficient (given that much of the rest of the ecosystem seems to manage this, although a lot of that is source rathe

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-11 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:03:49AM +0100, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote: [text/markdown instead of text/plain] That's IMO something much more interesting than text/html that should be implemented in MUAs (falling back to displaying it as text/plain eventually) but for now it doesn't display

Bug#1100042: ITP: python-casttube -- Interact with the YouTube Chromecast API

2025-03-11 Thread Edward Betts
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Edward Betts X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-casttube Version : 0.2.1 Upstream Author : Uri Katz <4urik...@gmail.com> * URL : https://github.com/ur1katz/casttube

Bug#1100047: ITP: flashmq -- A high-performance, light-weight MQTT broker/server

2025-03-11 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Matthias Urlichs X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: flashmq Version : 1.20.0 Upstream Contact: Wiebe Cazemier * URL : https://flashmq.org * License : OSL v3.0 Programming Lang: C++ Descriptio

Re: Bits from DPL

2025-03-11 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Hello, Sean Whitton wrote on 06/03/2025 at 02:01:13+0100: > Hello, > > On Wed 05 Mar 2025 at 11:35pm +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > >> Do you mind clarifying why that's the case, unless the reason is truly >> personal or undisclosable? > > It's pretty simple -- there is no-one with the free time t

Bug#1100019: ITP: graphite-editor -- Graphite-Editor a modern, vector graphics tool

2025-03-11 Thread Carl Keinath
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Carl Keinath X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: graphite-editor Version : Alpha Upstream Contact: Graphite Labs * URL : https://github.com/GraphiteEditor/Graphite * License : Apache-2.0 Program

Re: New appointment for the Debian Technical Committee: Paul Tagliamonte

2025-03-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sean, Am Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:01:06AM +0800 schrieb Sean Whitton: > > As defined by our constitution (§6.2.2), the Debian Technical Committee > > has recommended the appointment to the committee of: > > > > * Paul Tagliamonte > > > > I agree with their recommendation, and hereby appoint P

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:21:10PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > However, I'm reasonably certain that there are other cases where diversions > are intentional and perfectly valid. Unless 'missing-breaks' learns to > handle them it will report CI failures for *all* of them, at which point we > mi

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Charles Plessy
> On Thu 06 Mar 2025 at 01:21pm +09, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Around 12 years ago, I proposed a peer-review system to increase the > > quality of > > the packages in the NEW queue. https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview Le Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 05:41:14PM +0800, Sean Whitton a écrit : > > I

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 06:58:08PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: If you don't trust the vendor, then it makes no difference whether or not new official firmware/microcode can be uploaded/flashed or not. If you don't trust the vendor, then the initial microcode that came with your device might

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-11 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:36:20 -0500, "Helmut K. C. Tessarek" wrote: >On the other >hand, it's not always possible to have a test bed for every single setup. It is way easier to have a test bed or to arrange for console access than even trying to cater for every situation that might happen. Rest as

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Geert Stappers
> > We're not obligated to validate their questionable choices in buying > > hardware that ships with non-free firmware > > There are a lot of competing priorities here, and it's the height of > arrogance to be so certain that one's own opinion is best as to try to > prevent other people from maki

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2025-03-09 17:17:52 +0100 (+0100), Simon Josefsson wrote: [...] Right, in the sense that they embed non-free software in the hardware. None of those machines require them to be loaded by me as a user for them to be useful to me. This distinction is important to me. [...] For me there are

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Steve McIntyre
Simon Josefsson wrote: >Philip Hands writes: > >> Let's say that we could make that image bit-for-bit reproducible with an >> image that was produced by taking the normal with-nonfree-firmware >> image, and filtering it somehow (e.g. overwriting the non-free bits with >> zeros, say). >> >> Would y

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 08:36:45PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote: The current state where we have free software drivers for a lot of hardware is the result of a lot of people investing a lot of time into creating them. In the same way, we need to do both: support our current users by allowing th

Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2025-03-11 18:52:07 +0530 (+0530), Pirate Praveen wrote: [...] I think in previous discussions, it was suggested to pay for a proper legal opinion, may be from SFC or SFLC. I think this would be a good use of Debian's money. With a proper legal opinion, we will be in a much better position

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Aurélien COUDERC writes: > Le 10 mars 2025 11:56:28 GMT+01:00, Simon Josefsson a > écrit : > >>https://www.gnu.org/distros/optionally-free-not-enough.html >> >>https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/install-fest-devil.html > > … of course … that's where the core of the disagreement lies ! Right, I thi

Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Timo Röhling
Hi, * Pirate Praveen [2025-03-11 18:52]: I think in previous discussions, it was suggested to pay for a proper legal opinion, may be from SFC or SFLC. I think this would be a good use of Debian's money. With a proper legal opinion, we will be in a much better position to evaluate changes to

Re: Bug reports for Uploaders

2025-03-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 10 Mar 2025, Blair Noctis wrote: > > From your initial list, my preferred outcome is to modify > > tracker.debian.org so that all Uploaders are automatically subscribed, > > that's what has been requested for a long time in > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756954

Bug#1100046: ITP: python3-asyncclick -- Python package for creating beautiful command line interfaces, async version

2025-03-11 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Matthias Urlichs X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python3-asyncclick Version : 8.1.8 Upstream Contact: Matthias Urlichs * URL : h...@github.com:smurfix/asyncclick.git * License : BSD Programm

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:41:50PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: Simon Richter writes: their questionable choices in buying hardware that ships with non-free firmware Is there hardware that ships with free firmware? Seriously. Yeah, I think that should read "requires", not "ships with". Shippi

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Michael Stone
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 08:36:45PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote: We're not obligated to validate their questionable choices in buying hardware that ships with non-free firmware There are a lot of competing priorities here, and it's the height of arrogance to be so certain that one's own opinion

Re: Salsa pipeline limit

2025-03-11 Thread Peter B
On 10/03/2025 09:57, Simon Josefsson wrote: in a Salsa pipeline, and that seems to be a 5-10GB artifact unless my math is off. Hi Simon, sadly, Salsa pipelines will only handle up to 250MB, a long way short of even 5GB ! https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/issues/389 Che

Bug#1100034: ITP: golang-github-astromechza-etcpwdparse -- Golang library for parsing /etc/passwd entries

2025-03-11 Thread Roland Mas
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Roland Mas * Package name: golang-github-astromechza-etcpwdparse Version : 0.0~git20170319.f0e5f07-1 Upstream Author : Ben Meier * URL : https://github.com/astromechza/etcpwdparse * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go

Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Faidon Liambotis
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:19:52AM +0100, Timo Röhling wrote: > I'm not an FTP Team member, but I happen to have analyzed exactly this > question in detail [1]. The FTP team is very transparent in this regard and > provides all processing logs, so any DD can verify this for themselves. Thank you f

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Philip Hands
Hi Simon, Simon Josefsson writes: > While this may be fine to you it is not fine to me, and it is fine to > disagree on that. If there were a method of building images that did not touch the non-free components, I presume that would satisfy you. Let's say that we could make that image bit-for-

Re: Bug reports for Uploaders

2025-03-11 Thread Blair Noctis
On 05/03/2025 02:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 01:32 +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: On 04/03/2025 21:43, Marc Haber wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:15:16 +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: [...] Honestly I never understood how exactly @p.d.o addresses work. Devref says it's "a simple emai

Re: MiniDebConf Hamburg 2025

2025-03-11 Thread Matthias Geiger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:03, Matthias Geiger wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, We're pleased to announce registration and call for proposals for MiniDebconfHamburg 25 is now open. It will be held from 30th April 2025

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Marc Haber (2025-03-10 13:38:05) > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 09:33:55PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > >We've reached the point where people are shitting on nV for the > >quality of their drivers, and a kernel that has closed-source drivers > >loaded is "tainted", and the last release in whi

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 04:39:00PM +0100, Simon Josefsson a écrit : > > Could you explain how I would ask for review of a package? I re-read > this thread, and the newgateway-team homepages, but I still don't > understand how you think the process should work. > > Could we test the process by re

Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client

2025-03-11 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 05:32:37PM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > I like that idea, thanks! It would be easy enough to add that to > Incus' $PATH while making it simple for an end user to modify their > local environment to directly use `mc` if they wish. Let me express a concern regarding this

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 03:58:59PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Agreed. However none of that hardware require me to load non-free > firmware from my operating system, which is my point. That situation is > sufficient for me to accept to use the hardware and install an operating > system bui

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 8:29:24 AM MST Simon Josefsson wrote: > Aurélien COUDERC writes: > > Le 10 mars 2025 11:56:28 GMT+01:00, Simon Josefsson a écrit : > >>https://www.gnu.org/distros/optionally-free-not-enough.html > >> > >>https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/install-fest-devil.html > >> > > …

Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do

2025-03-11 Thread Dirk Lehmann
Hello Marc, I am currently new as Debian Maintainer, but I have more experience from upstream-side. As I understand your question about a general workflow of translations in all your email-cases correct, I think the short answer maybe to use `quilt` to patch the .PO files instead of committing t

Bug#1100155: ITP: magnum-capi-helm -- Helm driven Cluster API driver for Magnum

2025-03-11 Thread Guillaume Boutry
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Guillaume Boutry X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, boutryguillau...@gmail.com * Package name: magnum-capi-helm Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Contact: Dale Smith * URL : https://opendev.org/openstack/magnum-capi-helm * Lice

Bug#1100156: ITP: inkcut -- GUI for controlling vinyl cutters

2025-03-11 Thread Alexander Sulfrian
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alexander Sulfrian X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: inkcut Version : 2.1.5 Upstream Contact: Jairus Martin * URL : https://codelv.com/projects/inkcut/ * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: Pyt

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Maytham Alsudany
On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 09:52 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I have just drafted a workflow in > > https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team/reviews#how-to-request-or-make-a-review > > which I quote here: > > 0. (We are in pilot phases. Improvements of this workflow are welcome) > > 1. The p

Re: General Questions about Translations and what a package maintainer has to do

2025-03-11 Thread Maytham Alsudany
Hi Marc, Here are some of my thoughts based on my (relatively little) experience with both translating to Arabic and receiving translations. It might also be worthwhile to forward your message to debian-i18n@l.d.o, since translators and i18n people are more likely to be subscribed there and less

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Stephan Verbücheln
Am Montag, dem 10.03.2025 um 13:27 +0530 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > Basically hardware manufacturers are withholding code that they could > give you easily It is often not that easy because of stupid laws, for example laws that require vendors of radio devices to restrict the frequency range. That i

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On 3/10/25 17:52, Marc Haber wrote: It is fine to disagree that these are concerns worthy spending time on within the Debian project, which is my perception of the vote outcome. There are not concerns about spending time. There are no people willing to do so. This is, however, a long t

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-11 Thread Bjørn Mork
The Wanderer writes: > To be fair, while I *am* against the proposal, I'm also not a Debian > Developer - just an interested observer of, and occasional participant > in, discussions on Debian mailing lists (including this one). +1 and to clarify my view on format=flowed: This should not be ma

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-11 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Before I did anything else, attempting to view your email in aerc resulted in: No filter configured for this mimetype ('text/markdown') What would you like to do? O Open using the system handler :open S Save to file :save | Pipe to shell command :pi