Hi Simon, Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> writes:
> While this may be fine to you it is not fine to me, and it is fine to > disagree on that. If there were a method of building images that did not touch the non-free components, I presume that would satisfy you. Let's say that we could make that image bit-for-bit reproducible with an image that was produced by taking the normal with-nonfree-firmware image, and filtering it somehow (e.g. overwriting the non-free bits with zeros, say). Would you object if the normal way of generating the image was to apply the filter, rather than build it in parallel? If that would be OK, then one could have something that applied the filter to our normal images to provide people with the images you want, while not require duplication of building and storage. People could always confirm that they were getting the same result as building without the nonfree firmware by doing it themselves, and checking things matched. Is that something that would work for you? Cheers, Phil. -- Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
