Source: partman-zfs
Version: 56
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint
Christian Perrier has retired, so can't work on
the partman-zfs package anymore (at least with this address).
We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove
Hi Mike,
Michael Milligan wrote:
> Thanks for fixing! I will grab a daily image with partman 43 in it and
> give it a go.
Be careful that you might hit http://bugs.debian.org/780115 next.
If you create a pool on only one disk at first, you can easily attach
another later as a mirror, after inst
Yes, it was very annoying that I couldn't "fix" the issue by turning off
all the feature@ things as once they are in use, you can't turn them
off. Had to rebuild from scratch.
Thanks for fixing! I will grab a daily image with partman 43 in it and
give it a go.
Regards,
Mike
On 02/27/2015 04:34
Your message dated Sun, 08 Mar 2015 22:05:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#775395: fixed in partman-zfs 43
has caused the Debian Bug report #775395,
regarding partman-zfs in d-i jessie image does not create grub-compatible /boot
ZFS mirror
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain (2015-03-08):
> tags 775395 + patch pending
> thanks
>
> Hi KiBi,
>
> Could we have the attached fix for partman-zfs in sid please?
> This would be an RC bug, except that it is kfreebsd-any.
Sure!
> Furthermore, could I step in as maintainer
tags 775395 + patch pending
thanks
Hi KiBi,
Could we have the attached fix for partman-zfs in sid please?
This would be an RC bug, except that it is kfreebsd-any.
Furthermore, could I step in as maintainer (add myself to Uploaders) for
this and just upload it myself? I believe I'd need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 775395 + patch pending
Bug #775395 [partman-zfs] partman-zfs in d-i jessie image does not create
grub-compatible /boot ZFS mirror
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
tags 775395 + confirmed
user 775395 debian-...@lists.debian.org
usertags 775395 + kfreebsd
thanks
Hi Mike,
On 09/02/15 03:02, Michael Milligan wrote:
> This may help... 10.1 added a bunch of feature flags that grub may need
> to now support in the ZFS code and are probably tripping this all up.
ant
>
> Michael Milligan wrote:
>> Package: partman-zfs
>> Version: 42
>> Severity: grave
>> Tags: d-i
>> Justification: renders package unusable for ZFS-based install
>>
>> (which is probably the reason someone is trying Debian/kFreeBSD .. to
>> use Z
On 01/27/2015 02:02 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Milligan wrote:
>> But installing Grub failed with "unknown filesystem". In
>> troubleshooting the issue, it seems grub2 (version currently is
>> 2.02~beta2-19) does not recognize the "feature@lz4_compress" option (and
>> had bee
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #775395 [partman-zfs] partman-zfs in d-i jessie image does not create
grub-compatible /boot ZFS mirror
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
775395: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775395
Deb
Control: severity -1 important
Michael Milligan wrote:
> Package: partman-zfs
> Version: 42
> Severity: grave
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: renders package unusable for ZFS-based install
>
> (which is probably the reason someone is trying Debian/kFreeBSD .. to
> use ZFS)
Hi,
Michael Milligan wrote:
> But installing Grub failed with "unknown filesystem". In
> troubleshooting the issue, it seems grub2 (version currently is
> 2.02~beta2-19) does not recognize the "feature@lz4_compress" option (and
> had been previously reported) of the ZFS pools that kFreeBSD kernel
Package: partman-zfs
Version: 42
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable for ZFS-based install
(which is probably the reason someone is trying Debian/kFreeBSD .. to
use ZFS)
Dear Maintainer,
Tried the 2015-01-12 nightly mini.iso Jessie image. In the partition
setup
icated repo haven't been
easy!),
I noticed that partman-zfs (or 'someone') is creating a msdos label and ONE
partition
on the disk(s) I choose and use that partition for the ZFS device.
In, at least ZoL (but I expect that be generic ZFS), this isn't recommended. By
using
a pa
scm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/partman-zfs.git/commit/?id=46b42715da4ee17c95762129600958ff75f6d02d
Please could you upload partman-zfs/40 sometime before freeze?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 09/10/14 07:44, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Is it OK to upload partman-zfs with this:
>
> * Team upload.
> * When creating new zpools, disable optional features including
> lz4_compress, because that will require grub-pc >> 2.02~, which is
> in sid but
Is it OK to upload partman-zfs with this:
* Team upload.
* When creating new zpools, disable optional features including
lz4_compress, because that will require grub-pc >> 2.02~, which is
in sid but not jessie yet. (Closes: #764287)
Please revert this after grub-pc &
Package: partman-zfs
Version: 36
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On GNU/Linux it has been suggested before to use 'eatmydata' - a syscall
wrapper making synchronous writes asynchronous - while runn
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 757664 partman-zfs/36
Bug #757664 {Done: Colin Watson } [partman-lvm]
partman-lvm: cope with automatic creation of partitions in loop labels
No longer marked as fixed in versions partman-zfs/36.
> thanks
Stopping processin
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 20:13:30 +0100
with message-id <20140810191330.ga12...@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Bug#757666: fixed in partman-zfs 36
has caused the Debian Bug report #757666,
regarding partman-zfs: cope with automatic creation of partitions in loop labels
to be mar
e47534f2233c683150a1ada3c99fbf71a that's
causing issues, I'd expect bug reports to flow in. There's 28 in
testing, and it's been there for quite a while already, and was used to
build the d-i upload from december. Daily builds also have recent-ish
partman-zfs versions.
So z
On 03/02/14 22:24, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2014-02-03):
>> I feel tempted to revert much of it if kfreebsd is the only user of the
>> package now. I could maybe move those bits to a branch out of the way?
>
> Are you thinking about origin/zol?
Ah, yes it's already staged th
Steven Chamberlain (2014-02-03):
> On 03/02/14 21:49, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > Please remove partman-zfs from linux-any. It's only built on
> > kfreebsd-any again since version 29.
>
> A whole lot of changes got applied for the benefit on ZFS-on-Linux, so I
On 03/02/14 21:49, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Please remove partman-zfs from linux-any. It's only built on
> kfreebsd-any again since version 29.
A whole lot of changes got applied for the benefit on ZFS-on-Linux, so I
thought. It was sort of accidentally applied in master without a
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove partman-zfs from linux-any. It's only built on
kfreebsd-any again since version 29.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
Cyril Brulebois (2013-08-22):
> I'm very much tempted to upload partman-zfs 25 as partman-zfs 27, and
> call it a day. Broken partitioning is a very serious issue; ditto for
> depending on something that doesn't exist.
I've just reverted the commit on top of current mas
And there was a missing parenthesis in the added line, which
completely broke partman-zfs and, as a consequence, entire
partitioningSee #720442
Please, next time, *test* your proposed patches..:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> so we've got already #720442 and #720450 against partman-zfs, breaking
> partitioning, but also that:
> partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
> partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: z
Hi,
so we've got already #720442 and #720450 against partman-zfs, breaking
partitioning, but also that:
partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
partman-zfs/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (
Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:48:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#720064: fixed in partman-zfs 26
has caused the Debian Bug report #720064,
regarding partman-zfs: Add check for sparc as well
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:48:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#720065: fixed in partman-zfs 26
has caused the Debian Bug report #720065,
regarding partman-zfs: Rewrite the logic on waiting zfs moudule to load
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: src:partman-zfs
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Previous code detects the return value of modprobe which could be
always leading to a 5 seconds' pause. This patch changes it to detect
the existance of /dev/zfs every second and retry for up to 10 times.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
0002-Rewrite-
Package: src:partman-zfs
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Previously we only cared about kfreebsd so only kfreebsd-sparc is
checked, this patch adds sparc for ZoL.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
0001-Add-check-for-sparc-as-well.patch
Description: Binary data
Turbo Fredriksson (22/05/2013):
> On May 22, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > Le 22/05/2013 14:07, Turbo Fredriksson a écrit :
> >
> >> But what happened to the commits, where they moved to a separate branch?
> >
> > I haven't looked closely but, in short, those that would make
On May 22, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Le 22/05/2013 14:07, Turbo Fredriksson a écrit :
>
>> But what happened to the commits, where they moved to a separate branch?
>
> I haven't looked closely but, in short, those that would make packages
> unsuitable for release in unstable
On May 22, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Indeed, some commits probably pertain to branches (as Cyril probably
> already mentioned)mostly if they depend on packages that are not in
> the archive.
I have tried my best to make it work even if they don't. Besides, they
DO exist (most o
Thanks for your work.
Indeed, some commits probably pertain to branches (as Cyril probably
already mentioned)mostly if they depend on packages that are not in
the archive.
I think he did some such changes (sorry for the extra work,
Cyrilthough I think that giving Turbo commit access is the be
* base-installer/master
commit 13a98ab09f15086c28d8080d08389e4e3012e59e
Mount (bind) /proc and /sys as well on target to make sure grub-probe
works correctly. Is nessesary for ZFS...
* partman-zfs/master
commit 1bd59bde47534f2233c683150a1ada3c99fbf71a
Check if /usr is on a
This is in addition to some of my other fixes for partman-zfs to make it create
a ZFS instead of a ZVOL.
The following changes since commit 1a44e1b93eaeb0bcdb8312e684d2672726f52735:
* When loading the module, only sleep five secs if it didn't fail.
* A failed load of the zfs m
(no need to CC me now : I'm subscribed to -boot and will follow this thread)
Quoting Turbo Fredriksson (tu...@bayour.com):
> On May 11, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>
> > It seems that partman-zfs isn't quite finished. It
> > doesn't create a ro
On May 11, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> It seems that partman-zfs isn't quite finished. It
> doesn't create a root filesystem. Only allows you to
> create a volume, and on that put a root fs...
>
> I've added support for creating a root fs, se
t;moose"...
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Template: partman-zfs/text/zfs
Type: text
# :sl4:
# File system name (untranslatable in many languages)
_Description: zfs
Template: partman/f
hat uses more than one
> physical volume. The boot loader only supports this configuration
> for pools in Mirror mode, not Striped or RAID-Z modes.
I split the two sentences in two paragraphs. This way, the second
sentence is factorized with partman-zfs/multipv_boot and has to be
translated o
a separate /boot partition in another ZFS
- pool in Mirror mode or with another file system, such as UFS.
+ Make sure /boot is on a partition using a supported ZFS pool
+ configuration, or a different file system such as UFS.
Template: partman-zfs/multipv_boot
Type: error
# :sl4:
Description
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> (please keep -boot CC'ed to answers)
[...]
> Template: partman-zfs/multipv_root
> Type: error
> # :sl4:
> Description: Separate /boot mandatory for this ZFS configuration
> The ZFS pool where your root file system is hosted is configured to use mo
Please find attached the debconf templates for partman-zfs, the D-I
component that will be used to setup ZFS on kFreeBSD systems. These
templates are sometimes very similar to partman-lvm templates, but
some are brand new and might need the eye of a native speaker..:-)
I did my best but, of
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> There are rewording needed to this template. particularly, the
> synopsisjust sucks (too long, is a sentence, etc.)
I corrected them, the best I could. Please check my changes.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t; _Description: ZFS file system
>
> +Template: partman-zfs/multipv_root
> +Type: error
> +# :sl4:
> +Description: This ZFS configuration is not supported without separate /boot
> + The ZFS pool where your root filesystem is hosted is configured to use more
> + than one physic
Quoting Robert Millan (r...@debian.org):
> Thanks for the corrections. I should have mentioned that most of the
> strings are based on similar templates from partman-lvm, you might
> want to make similar fixes there.
Done. As well as corrections and comments from Justin.
I marked the templates
2011/8/1 Christian PERRIER :
> I made a few corrections. Please see
> bb075983e0c60e1c5375c4df995428f8f6897114. However, given the length of
> these changes, I'd prefer debian-l10n-english to also have a look at
> these templates. Justin and others, if you're not on a beach somewhere
> in the world
c60e1c5375c4df995428f8f6897114. However, given the length of
> these changes, I'd prefer debian-l10n-english to also have a look at
> these templates. Justin and others, if you're not on a beach somewhere
> in the world, would you mind looking at the abovementioned file (it
> inc
Quoting Robert Millan (r...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> Latest version of partman-zfs includes many new strings in
> partman-zfs.templates. Since I wasn't sure about the procedures, I
> haven't enabled them for translation.
>
> Please see:
>
> http://anonscm.deb
Hi,
Latest version of partman-zfs includes many new strings in
partman-zfs.templates. Since I wasn't sure about the procedures, I
haven't enabled them for translation.
Please see:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/partman-zfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc5406791a0685a3be3daf1a226462
Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2011 22:21:09 +0100
with message-id <201105072221.09488.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #624481,
regarding debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 unstable d-i cannot fetch partman-zfs
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 04/28/2011 03:31 PM, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> > According the changelog [1] it was reenabled on partman-zfs version 6,
> > currently available on testing and sid.
>
> yes, that's the one i found and downloaded. The bug appears to
On 04/28/2011 03:31 PM, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> According the changelog [1] it was reenabled on partman-zfs version 6,
> currently available on testing and sid.
yes, that's the one i found and downloaded. The bug appears to be that
d-i doesn't know about it.
--dkg
According the changelog [1] it was reenabled on partman-zfs version 6,
currently available on testing and sid.
1 -
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/partman-zfs/partman-zfs_6/changelog
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
--
To
Daniel Kahn Gillmor (28/04/2011):
> I'm not sure why it wasn't listed as available.
Probably because it used to be kfreebsd-amd64-only:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/partman-zfs/news/20110213T212457Z.html
Might be missing an updated on the d-i side; you could check the
debian-b
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I pulled the kfreebsd-i386 installer from here:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/netboot/debian-installer/kfreebsd-i386/
and i launched it in expert mode.
I looked for the partman-zfs udeb in the list of "download inst
Quoting Robert Millan (r...@debian.org):
> I propose something like this:
>
> Description: Go back to the menu and correct this problem?
> You have configured one or more partitions with the ZFS file
> system. Although ZFS is supported on 32-bit i386, using it without
> special tuning may lead
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:14:34PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Actually, disregard this. I forgot that PAE is only available
> on modern CPUs, which most likely support AMD64 ISA
> anyway.
PAE goes back to the P6 era as far as I remember, so lost of them don't
have amd64 support, but do have PA
2011/2/8 Robert Millan :
> I checked documentation in FreeBSD wiki and it
> seems PAE would solve the stability problem, but
> it may have an unbearable performance cost.
>
> I'll do some tests and then bring this up in -bsd.
> I've disabled the string for translation until this option
> is discuss
2011/2/8 Christian PERRIER :
> My main point is to avoid "jargon". Here, we are talking about
> kfreebsd ports where only two flavours exist: -i386 and -amd64. Both
> run on the same family of processors and the main difference between
> them is that one is 32-bits and the other is 64-bits.
>
> So,
Quoting Robert Millan (r...@debian.org):
> Hi Christian,
>
> > If I understand well, partman-zfs is unstable on kfreebsd-i386 but
> > fine on kfreebsd-amd64. However, would it be a problem to talk about
> > "32 bits systems" and "64 bits systems" i
2011/2/8 Robert Millan :
>> I'm not aware of huge changes that
>> cannot be emulated by PAE, too.
>
> If that works it could be considered, but I heard PAE is
> very inefficient. This should be discussed in -bsd.
I checked documentation in FreeBSD wiki and it
seems PAE would solve the stability p
Your tone looks unnecessarily accusational. I gave brief
information because starting an in-depth debate about
the actual technical reasons didn't seem useful. What
matters to the template text in partman-zfs is that ZFS
has trouble with i386, not with 32-bit arches in general.
But i
On 2011-02-08, Robert Millan wrote:
> This is a common missconception. ZFS has stability and performance
> problems on Intel 386 due to limitations of this architecture, it's not
> because of word length. I386 carries on with 30 years of ill design
> decisions and legacy baggage. Other 32-bit arc
2011/2/8 Christian PERRIER :
> I corrected the last "filesystem" to "file system" but, more
> generally, I'm wondering about the general idea.
>
> [...]
> (also dropping one occurrence or "*your* partitions"as partitions
> are not "mine")
Btw thanks for these corrections.
--
Robert Millan
2011/2/8 Christian PERRIER :
> Hello Robert (CC'ed to get attention...of course no need to CC me back
> in answers),
Hi Christian,
> If I understand well, partman-zfs is unstable on kfreebsd-i386 but
> fine on kfreebsd-amd64. However, would it be a problem to talk about
> &
Hello Robert (CC'ed to get attention...of course no need to CC me back
in answers),
I'd like to comment on the reinstated partman-zfs template:
_Description: Go back to the menu and correct this problem?
You have configured one or more partitions with the ZFS file
system. Altho
2010/12/6 Cyril Brulebois :
> No. That doesn't remove it *from the archive*.
> | $ rmadison partman-zfs -s unstable|grep kfreebsd
> | partman-zfs | 3 | sid/main/debian-installer | kfreebsd-i386
> | partman-zfs | 4 | sid/main/debian-installer | kfreebsd-amd64
>
> Old bin
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
ZFS is unstable/inefficient on i386 due to limitations of this architecture.
Untill a warning message can be added, it is better to provide it only on
kfreebsd-amd64.
Unfortunately it's not possible to add this warning message right now, because
it is too
Robert Millan (06/12/2010):
> It was removed from unstable on my last upload.
No. That doesn't remove it *from the archive*.
| $ rmadison partman-zfs -s unstable|grep kfreebsd
| partman-zfs | 3 | sid/main/debian-installer | kfreebsd-i386
| partman-zfs | 4 | sid/main/debian-installer |
irectly, but rather as a result
> | of the package's state in unstable propagating to testing.
>
> So, get the binary removed from unstable, and that'll get propagated
> to testing.
It was removed from unstable on my last upload. According
to the text you pasted, when partman-zfs
2010/12/5 Cyril Brulebois :
> Robert Millan (05/12/2010):
>> Ok, I disabled partman-zfs on kfreebsd-i386.
>
> Need to get rid of it in the archive too, I guess? I don't see any bug
> against ftp.debian.org to that effect.
Actually the request should be sent to -release, b
Robert Millan (05/12/2010):
> Actually the request should be sent to -release […]
No. I wrote ftp.debian.org and I meant it.
To save you some seconds locating the appropriate statement:
| The release team can remove source packages - and *all* binaries built
| from them - from testing. Per-archi
Robert Millan (05/12/2010):
> Ok, I disabled partman-zfs on kfreebsd-i386.
Need to get rid of it in the archive too, I guess? I don't see any bug
against ftp.debian.org to that effect.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ok, I disabled partman-zfs on kfreebsd-i386.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimzezeulgneds0dryrfcd6j8k4
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Christian PERRIER (04/12/2010):
> > > I unmarked this for translation.
> > >
> > > My opinion, indeed, is that if ZFS is unsafe on kfreebsd-i386,
> > > then partman-zfs should no tbe kfreebsd-any but only
> &
Christian PERRIER (04/12/2010):
> > I unmarked this for translation.
> >
> > My opinion, indeed, is that if ZFS is unsafe on kfreebsd-i386,
> > then partman-zfs should no tbe kfreebsd-any but only
> > kfreebsd-amd64
>
> As suggested by Robert, I bring this
> Quoting Robert Millan (r...@alioth.debian.org):
> > Author: rmh
> > Date: Tue Nov 30 18:34:05 2010
> > New Revision: 65817
> >
> > Log:
> > Add partman-zfs/i386 template to warn users who want to use ZFS on i386.
> >
> > Added:
> &g
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 16:37, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> My opinion, indeed, is that if ZFS is unsafe on kfreebsd-i386, then
> partman-zfs should no tbe kfreebsd-any but only kfreebsd-amd64
+1
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br
Quoting Robert Millan (r...@alioth.debian.org):
> Author: rmh
> Date: Tue Nov 30 18:34:05 2010
> New Revision: 65817
>
> Log:
> Add partman-zfs/i386 template to warn users who want to use ZFS on i386.
>
> Added:
>trunk/packages/partman/partman-zfs/check.d/
Quoting Robert Millan (r...@alioth.debian.org):
> Author: rmh
> Date: Tue Nov 30 18:34:05 2010
> New Revision: 65817
>
> Log:
> Add partman-zfs/i386 template to warn users who want to use ZFS on i386.
>
> Added:
>trunk/packages/partman/partman-zfs/check.d/
Ok, I'm switching it to kfreebsd-any then. Thank you.
2010/11/6 Philipp Kern :
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 12:35:28AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>> I noticed these warnings in the PTS page for partman-zfs:
>>
>> # partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 12:35:28AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> I noticed these warnings in the PTS page for partman-zfs:
>
> # partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 8.1-4)
> # partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>
> Does this mean t
[ Please CC me, not subscribed ]
Hi,
I noticed these warnings in the PTS page for partman-zfs:
# partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 8.1-4)
# partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
Does this mean the Architecture field in partman-zfs should
be moved from &
Your message dated Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:24:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#595759: fixed in partman-zfs 1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595759,
regarding ZFS support (partman-zfs)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
that #595007 has been fixed (thanks Colin!), this partman-zfs
> package would be usable on unstable at least.
>
> I would be careful not to let it migrate to squeeze unless parted 2.3-3
> is allowed to migrate already. But my understanding is that this can't
> happen (I wi
Hello Robert,
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2010/10/14, Robert Millan :
>> Done. Should I upload this?
>
> Btw, now that #595007 has been fixed (thanks Colin!), this partman-zfs
> package would be usable on unstable at least.
>
> I would
2010/10/14, Robert Millan :
> Done. Should I upload this?
Btw, now that #595007 has been fixed (thanks Colin!), this partman-zfs
package would be usable on unstable at least.
I would be careful not to let it migrate to squeeze unless parted 2.3-3
is allowed to migrate already. But
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
>
>> - drop translation marks on templates (dropping _ from Description);
>
>
> We could even activate l10n on these templates. Anyway, the published l10n
> status will be based
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
> - drop translation marks on templates (dropping _ from Description);
We could even activate l10n on these templates. Anyway, the published l10n
status will be based on what we had at the end of the string freeze
(mid-July). The l10n status be
2010/10/13, Otavio Salvador :
> This wasn't clear from your patch. So please:
>
> - commit it into SVN;
> - drop translation marks on templates (dropping _ from Description);
>
> Since it is a "new udeb" you could commit it in the final required
> state, and put a note in the changelog about part
Robert,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2010/10/12, Otavio Salvador :
>> Personally I see no problem in push this however it ought to be
>> splited since the patch does more then the workaround.
>
> It's supposed to be applied onto a copy of partman-ufs, then it
> becomes
2010/10/12, Otavio Salvador :
> Personally I see no problem in push this however it ought to be
> splited since the patch does more then the workaround.
It's supposed to be applied onto a copy of partman-ufs, then it
becomes a separate package. Is that what you mean?
--
Robert Millan
--
To
Hello Robert,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
> Here's a new patch. It takes into account that filesystem
> creation is stateful with ZFS (once a pool is created, it
> remains "registered"), but partman expects it to be stateless.
>
> The workaround is to export the pool i
it.
--
Robert Millan
diff -Nurp -x changelog partman-zfs.old/check.d/zfs_root
partman-zfs/check.d/zfs_root
--- partman-zfs.old/check.d/zfs_root2010-09-02 14:37:52.966988000 +0200
+++ partman-zfs/check.d/zfs_root1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-# Chec
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
This script converts partman-ufs into partman-zfs.
Patches for parted (#595007) and grub-installer (#595152) are
also required to build a working installer.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT
100 matches
Mail list logo
