(Putting -boot in the loop again.) Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> (2014-02-03): > On 03/02/14 22:24, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Are you thinking about origin/zol? > > Ah, yes it's already staged there. > > You reverted one commit from that series already, one that enabled > builds for linux-any and also loaded the zfs module, so I expect it is > completely broken on Linux already.
There's no zfs on linux…
> Everything else from that branch has potentially caused regressions on
> kfreebsd as well as the example I gave.
If there's stuff before 1bd59bde47534f2233c683150a1ada3c99fbf71a that's
causing issues, I'd expect bug reports to flow in. There's 28 in
testing, and it's been there for quite a while already, and was used to
build the d-i upload from december. Daily builds also have recent-ish
partman-zfs versions.
So zfs users might want to double-check how {well,bad} partman-zfs works
nowadays. Please note a d-i upload is pending (we're waiting for linux
to hit testing); and if #737568 is processed soon, we should get version
31 in that build.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
