Ok, I'm switching it to kfreebsd-any then. Thank you. 2010/11/6 Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org>: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 12:35:28AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: >> I noticed these warnings in the PTS page for partman-zfs: >> >> # partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 8.1-4) >> # partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules >> >> Does this mean the Architecture field in partman-zfs should >> be moved from "all" to "kfreebsd-any" ? > > britney does check arch:all instability only on i386, I'm afraid. > >> I intentionally used "all" because partman-ufs (which is >> kfreebsd-specific) is set to "all" too, and so are the rest >> of filesystems, most of which are linux-specific. > > partman-ufs's deps *are* satisfied on i386, due to ufs-modules being > available. > >> No problem on my side with changing it, but I had this >> feeling that making a script happy is the wrong reason. >> I.e. if the reason is valid for partman-zfs, I guess it'd be >> valid for partman-ufs and the rest. > > No, because partman-ufs is indeed also working on Linux. Now you could, > of course, argue that this might not be true for the hurd or another > new kernel, but that's a thing we are ignoring in many more places at > this point (i.e. Linux is still "special", and will be for quite some > time). > > Kind regards, > Philipp Kern > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkzVJMkACgkQ7Ro5M7LPzdg2yQCgrTG2RVYB7eTAgwwAiW1rmKfC > JsUAn1iXeo93qV/WAqBFZ5LSCMLu+Tzd > =2u79 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
-- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=9vgpavh8f7ul54ktfozdfh01cbvmjh4jta...@mail.gmail.com
