Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > Hi, > > so we've got already #720442 and #720450 against partman-zfs, breaking > partitioning, but also that: > partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > partman-zfs/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > partman-zfs/armel unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/armel unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > partman-zfs/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > partman-zfs/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > partman-zfs/mips unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/mips unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > partman-zfs/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > partman-zfs/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > partman-zfs/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > partman-zfs/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1) > partman-zfs/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules > > (Also, missing 25 and 26 tags in git, and outdated master.) > > I'm very much tempted to upload partman-zfs 25 as partman-zfs 27, and > call it a day. Broken partitioning is a very serious issue; ditto for > depending on something that doesn't exist.
I just pushed my branches. This is really my problem with git:always forgetting to push things back....
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
