Neil:
It?s an MXL Cardioid condenser mic, if you want the exact model I can give
it to you tomorrow, It does?nt include the stand.
Greetings!
Daniel Aspuru
---
http://daniel.aspuru.com
-Mensaje original-
De: Neil McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Neil
McGovern
Enviado el
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 19:35 -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> - Talk selection
> - Ganneff will assemble the team this week.
> - talk scheduling: Daniel S, Andreas T, Tássia Camões
Given I'll be working with Andreas and Tássia on scheduling, I'm happy
to also assist Ganneff
ve to spend the time studying.
I'm sorry about the inconvenience and thank you for the understanding.
Regards,
Daniel
- --
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.n
On 24/07/12 02:01, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:20:02PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>>
>> Please review my changes both with regard to content as for english
>> language improvements.
>
> I commited some attempts at that.
>
>> Gaudenz
>> \subsection{Debian is Cho
Comments on the issues raised by Gunnar and Gaudenz:
> However, I fear the effort might be too hard, and -want it or not-
> part of it will fall upon the shoulder of the DC13 locals. This time,
In fact, the locals (I'm only a semi-local, living in Zurich for 2 years
now and haven't been part of
I've heard various feedback comments about DebConf12, and also questions
about DebConf13, and I started thinking that maybe a survey is needed to
uncover more about the possibilities for DebConf, the attendee
preferences and feelings about different subjects, etc
I understand some data can alrea
On 26/07/12 06:35, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> (We should maybe consider dropping -discuss as this is clearly -team
> material,
> IMHO)
>
> Hi all,
>
> Le mercredi, 25 juillet 2012 23.31:52, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>> In any commercial project, if a
Has there ever been any variation to the existing sponsorship model, for
example, having sponsors for particular tracks?
E.g. if there is a free/open VoIP track next year, there are a few
commercial VoIP operators I could reach out to - such sponsors could be
asked to pay a premium for things l
On 26/07/12 22:55, Philip Hands wrote:
> Daniel Pocock writes:
> ...
>> Just imagine if one hops on a train by mistake - there are many trains
>> in Switzerland, very frequently too, some children love trains
>
> From what I hear, the local railway station doens'
On 27/07/12 10:27, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 21:49 +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Has there ever been any variation to the existing sponsorship model, for
>> example, having sponsors for particular tracks?
>
> We have had sponsors pay for specific elements.
On 27/07/12 14:14, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Daniel Pocock dijo [Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:49:33PM +]:
>> Has there ever been any variation to the existing sponsorship model, for
>> example, having sponsors for particular tracks?
>>
>> E.g. if there is a free/open VoIP t
> And yes... Raising 200,000 CHF still... makes me shiver :-( I just
> hope we can make it. Keeping a "plan B" in case we don't should be a
> priority :-/
That is an interesting point - people from beyond Europe are likely to
spend a lot of their own money coming to DebConf, buying tickets months
On 26/07/12 20:52, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> Norman García Aguilar writes:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:21:03 +0200
>> Luca Capello wrote:
>>
>>
>> Was it agreed to use CHF instead of EUR/USD? usually for DC in America
>> sposnorship brochure use USD and in Europe EUR...
>
> A
On 27/07/12 16:14, Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:35:26PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> e) set a deadline for getting signed sponsorship pledges, and tell
>> people not to buy plane tickets until DebConf hits the sponsorship target
>
> to protect Deb
> Of course, given the family-hostile accommodation that exists at Le Camp,
> and the fact that camping isn't sounding like it's going to be allowed
> (bizarrely), and the nearest alternative accommodation being miles away,
> and there apparently being nothing nearby for non-debianites to
non-deb
On 27/07/12 23:48, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 08:10:34PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I don't want to give my own opinions on those things, I felt it was
>> better to initiate the discussion about a [survey] to find out what the
>> wider community feel
no support for disabled
people, but they still get the Olympics.
> On 07/26/2012 06:02 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> The final word on the subject is that getting people to pay for
>> something is the only completely unbiased survey:
>
> Sorry to pull this one quote out of a
They have some kind of promotion, win the hotel for a night:
http://www.pilatus-drachenstein.ch/enCH
It asks you to complete 5 trivial `tasks' and then gives you a form to
fill in
The form data is submitted via HTTP POST using content type
application/x-amf - the whole exchange is easily cap
On 02/08/12 11:22, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> On 31.07.2012 18:02, Moray Allan wrote:
>> We should create a cancellation policy. This might just be that
>> DebConf registration fees are non-refundable. Or, that they are
>> non-refundable after some date a few months before the conference. In
>>
> Is this topic the result of a real experience/demand we had? I have
> not yet heard from (of course, that does not imply there has not been)
> any refund request. I don't know if we need an explicit one, or we can
> keep addressing it on a case-to-case basis. If we start drafting
> policies for
On 03/08/12 20:29, Henning Sprang wrote:
> Look what the swiss did!
>
> DC13 must be stopped!
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/lazylava/7701464960/in/set-72157630257037958
Actually, there is concern that he might have escaped into orbit on one
of the large number of fireworks ignited for the Sw
On 03/08/12 21:05, Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> Why not a much simpler (and less scary) policy like:
> "Refunds are not available regularly,
> but expections can be given by $whoever"
>
> This tells "we will decide, if your reasons are reasonable for us"
> without using ugly lawyer wording.
>
> If
On 08/08/12 19:27, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le mercredi, 8 août 2012 20.57:15, Luca Capello a écrit :
>> * PLATINUM - starting from CHF 20'000 [DC10 30'000, DC11 30'000, DC12
>> 25'000]
>>
>> Benefits from gold, and also:
>>
>> + Name and description of sponsor in all press releases relati
On 08/08/12 19:54, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@ftbfs.de):
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue Aug 07, 2012 at 16:35:16 +0200, Michele Cane wrote:
>>> I discussed this issue with Mr. Pianaro several times. They are really
>>> against camping.
>>> Concerning more beds we considered
> I have put the "DebConf13 venue decision" up for decision by the DebConf team
> at its next meeting [2]; both the localteam volunteers and Le Camp need to
> know rather soon if DebConf13's going to happen there or not. In my
It is an unpleasant subject, but certainly should be discussed in
On 13/08/12 15:47, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Richard Darst writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> (a bit late, but...)
>
> From the timing I'm not sure if your mail was sent before you read my
> last mail to this thread [1] or afterwards. Could you please clarify if my
> mail addresses your concerns
On 13/08/12 18:46, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>>> (3) The venue was advertized as "camping will be allowed" and now it
>>> sounds like camping won't be possible. You are telling lies. It's
>>> true that the local team thought that camping will be possible in
>>> some form. We are still ne
On 13/08/12 20:33, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:56:26 +0200, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
>> If Le Camp is destroyed by a tornado, [...]
>
> ...then we will not have any DebConf13-in-Switzerland problem, given
> that the not-so-big-Switzerland will not exist anymore :-(
>
r emails,
or the words from Holger's email which really says the same thing.
But on the issue of whether we have no policy: I just think that is a
bad idea. It is better to tell people the worst case scenario before
they pay any money, then if something goes wrong, they will not feel angry.
&
On 14/08/12 14:26, Brian Gupta wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Dienstag, 14. August 2012, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>>> Not really. Until we start giving something to the customers, we are
>>> obliged to return money to the customer, if he ask so. Yo
On 14/08/12 20:17, Michele Cane wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:11 +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>> Given the threshold for 200 beds/night, does it make sense to have
>> DebCamp elsewhere, but not too far away hopefully?
>
> No, DebCamp is used to prepare t
On 15/08/12 13:03, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le mercredi, 15 août 2012 14.51:20, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>> Another idea: what if (…)
>
> In french we say: "Avec des `si', on peut mettre Paris en bouteille". Which
> translates to something like &quo
On 15/08/12 14:23, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> On 15.08.2012 15:37, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> But the issue of attendance during the DebCamp week has very real
>> financial implications - you don't think it is worth looking at options
>> to mitigate such risks?
>
> it
On 15/08/12 15:41, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:01:20 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Nattie Mayer-Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:37:45PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>> Bu
>> c) after DebConf: will bandwidth still be available for another 1-2
>> weeks? Will there be billing issues?
>
> I don't think Le Camp will be available after DebConf. And I think we
> should only think about DebCamp parallel events.
>
Topping up numbers for the DebCamp week is the highest pr
>> We can decide these things at the meeting where we discuss the issue
>
> You are continuing the "what if" game.
>
> We cannot engineering all possibilities, and we are Debian / DebConf, so
> no committee. but doers! If you want to continue with your idea, go
> asking informally people, give u
On 17/08/12 15:39, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> This year, the priority is to have a time where most Swiss people can
> participate. The rest of us are nice-to-have, but not a priority. The
> proposed times are OK in Europe and in America (and they fall in line
> with the meeting times we have had over th
On 19/08/12 19:31, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> On 08/19/2012 07:22 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>> Ana Guerrero writes:
>>> Back when DebConf10, we even sent a press release asking for donations:
>>> http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20100519
>>> Some people donated after this, but we didn't exactly trac
On 20/08/12 13:38, Richard Darst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Consider targeting of the source: while individuals may not donate a
> huge amount, perhaps small businesses would make also make (bigger)
> crowdfunding donations.
>
> We have lots of merchandising we have done in the past: umbrellas,
Merchandis
On 20/08/12 15:12, Richard Darst wrote:
>
> p.s. the original thread was about cancellations, which morphed into
> refunds, but refunds are the only practical effect of cancellation,
> and that only affects a few people. Sponsored people not attending is
> the other case, which we deal with thro
On 21/08/12 11:50, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here my very personal thoughts on it and i need to say that i have not
> yet discussed with any of the other listmasters of lists.d.o!
>
> On Tue Aug 21, 2012 at 11:33:31 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:58:20
I'm just wondering if there is ongoing interest in anything beyond IRC,
either for the -team meetings, or for use at DebConf itself
I've been evaluating various products, like SylkServer, and I'm happy to
support such initiatives either for DebConf or a wider Debian use case.
SylkServer ITP b
team, or a mini-DebConf)
On 21/08/12 13:40, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> I'm just wondering if there is ongoing interest in anything beyond IRC,
> either for the -team meetings, or for use at DebConf itself
>
> I've been evaluating various products, like SylkS
On 31/08/12 11:21, Philipp Hug wrote:
>>> not be much more bureaucratic burden than "provide conclusive accounting
>> for
>>> DebConf13" and "agree where the remaining money (or depts) shall go"
>> that we
>>> will have to do anyway.
>>
>
> The accounting has to be separate anyway and the good t
On 31/08/12 14:21, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le vendredi, 31 août 2012 13.28:06, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>> On the issue of (a) leftover money and (b) membership, this is where a
>> limited company may be more appropriate, e.g DC13 GmbH or DC13 AG?
>
> No.
On 31/08/12 15:39, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> On 31.08.2012 14:46, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> For example, I've heard that anyone who wants to make a GmbH or AG has
>> to pay a big security deposit for their employer taxes, and 10,000 CHF
>> per year in admin fees -
On 31/08/12 13:56, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Freitag, 31. August 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> In Switzerland, DebConf's worst case scenario is that every foreign
>> sponsor and every person paying the professional rate will be charged
>> VAT (about 8%). Swiss companie
On 01/09/12 20:41, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:21:09AM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote:
>> The budget of dc13 is above the limit where you have to start paying VAT,
>> whereas debian.ch's budget isn't and won't be in the near future.
>
> Why is that? Do you think that it's not eligib
On 02/09/12 11:30, Philipp Hug wrote:
> For non-swiss companies we expect to not need to charge VAT.
This is really positive and what I'm sure everyone was hoping - but when
you say `expect', does that mean it is still being investigated, or it
is subject to some application for charitable statu
On 02/09/12 12:07, Michele Cane wrote:
>> * Forfait for accomodation is calculated incorrectly if based on a
>> minimum 200person occupancy.
>> He just calculated 200x (most expensive rooms), but there only exist
>> 129 of those :-)
>> Much fairer would be a price based on average room price.
>
>
On 03/09/12 08:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I think that the sponsorship committee should:
> 1) verify that the funding asked for is adequate (given the expected
>travel costs from the originating country)
> 2) rank demands based on *benefit of attendance for Debian*.
>If you quantify, for
>> c) or a focus on young people/students, perhaps?
>>
>> This last option stands out most for me, whether it is 100% sponsorship
>> or just 33% discount, the intention is to stimulate a future generation
>> rather than to pay for results now.
>
> You are making the assumption that the future gen
On 04/09/12 19:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Montag, 3. September 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Actually, that is an interesting point
>
> no, its a boring old point...
>
>> If somebody's employer gives them a week of work time to attend
On 05/09/12 09:31, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 4. September 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> no. We only count money (or directly valuable ressources, usually things)
>>> into account for sponsoring.
>>>
>>> (I guesstimate) Half of
On 05/09/12 14:28, Holger Levsen wrote:
> problem per se. What is a problem is that you seem to insist on your ideas...
I don't mean to `insist' or `rant' about any one idea, nor waste
anybody's time (mine is no less valuable than yours)
However, when I see a comment such as your choice of the w
On 07/09/12 03:03, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:03:01 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:20:25 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>
>>> So my idea would be to go with <2000, 2000+, 6000+, 12000+ and 25k+.
>>>
>> These new levels are even mo
On 17/09/12 22:40, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 03:03:44 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>> Given that we need to go forward (at least two possible sponsors are
>> waiting for the brochure), I propose to discuss the final levels
>> *before* the next IRC meeting, i.e. before 2
On 15/08/12 19:54, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> We cannot engineering all possibilities, and we are Debian / DebConf, so
> no committee. but doers! If you want to continue with your idea, go
> asking informally people, give us something like:
> - the OpenCowGroup: a group of 12 people and 2 cows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22/08/12 08:57, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le mardi, 21 août 2012 13.40:07, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>> I've been evaluating various products, like SylkServer, and I'm
>> happy to support such initia
On 18/09/12 14:36, Michele Cane wrote:
>
>> The discussion about the contract suggests it is not 200, more like 235
>> bed average now: so the `risk' factor is higher
>
>
> Let's stop talking about average number of people in Le Camp.
>
> To have the full access at Le Camp we have to pay 4880 C
I just took the train from Zurich to Geneva a few days ago, passing Le Camp
I had the embedded Ganglia agent running in Lumicall on my phone, it has
collected a nice map of network coverage along the route
There is a dot for Vaumarcus
<>___
Debconf-
On 20/09/12 16:00, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Michele Cane writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just spoke with Le Camp for the BSP on October 27.
>>
>> We can have the Passerelle building (minimum 650 CHF)
>>
>> Two problems:
>>
>> - There is no kitchen available so we will have to buy kooked
On 23/09/12 12:08, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:00:14 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>> Michele Cane writes:
>>> Please if is not ok for you to rent it at this conditions let me know
>>> ASAP because I have to give the confirmation on Monday 24.
>>
>> I'm a bit unsur
On 23/09/12 21:17, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> P.S.: I'm a bit worried about the recent news regarding the contract for
> DebConf with Le Camp. It seems that all my initial hopes that we will be
> able to reduce the price somewhat were wrong. We really need a plan
> about how to get all that money
On 25/09/12 09:00, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>> I find the level for silver way too high for what you get in response.
>
> end I think the benefits don't matter that much to companies. I guess
> that most of them sponsor DebConf because they want to support Debian,
> not because of the benefits.
On 26/09/12 14:15, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> If we start DebConf let's say in Tuesday with arrival day being Monday,
> I expect people to keep the same routine and just attend 2-3 days to DebCamp.
> Everybody who is already a Debian contributor or have a okish "Debconf plan"
> tends to get sponsorhip
On 28/09/12 10:12, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I just committed (SVN r3732 [1]) the version of the contract Le Camp
> sent us with the our last comments. Since the original is in French, I
> quickly translated it to English, please other French-speaking people
> check my translation!
>
>
On 28/09/12 14:21, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:43:45 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 28/09/12 10:12, Luca Capello wrote:
>>> I just committed (SVN r3732 [1]) the version of the contract Le Camp
>>> sent us with the our last co
On 28/09/12 17:10, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:05:17 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 28/09/12 14:21, Luca Capello wrote:
>>> If the above numbers do not change for 2013, it means that we can still
>>> cancel without having pa
These discussions have been on IRC again and appear to be circular
dependencies
These appear to be the key facts:
- Le Camp contract: 160k CHF, with 60k to be paid by non-refundable
installments well in advance, and if we don't come up with the other
100k by July, no DC13
- DC12 had less than th
On 05/10/12 10:44, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:29:18 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> until when wants Le Camp us to sign the contract?
>
> Sorry, I missed this question.
>
> I actually do not know: from my understanding they wanted us to sign it
> ASAP, but then I h
On 05/10/12 11:08, Michele Cane wrote:
> Hi,
>> - will they reconsider the possibility of allowing us to cook?
> No.
If this is 100% impossible to change, and if global team members are not
100% committed to the budget, then I personally would not feel it is
productive use of Luca's time making a
On 05/10/12 11:51, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012, Philipp Hug wrote:
>> For me there are two problems:
>> * Food must be by meals consumed and not full board. And if there's an
>> option that we don't need to take the food from them, I would just have the
>> number of meals rem
On 05/10/12 13:47, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012, Philipp Hug wrote:
>> The current offer for food is about 25% of their annual food sales budget.
>> And this only for 2 weeks.
>> So, I think there should be some flexibility on their side :-)
>
> ui.
>
>
> to say it very mil
I'm sure it's not necessary to repeat the back-up venues[1]
However, as it feels like there is something of an impasse over the
contract and budget, I thought I would see what else exists
I found a few other links that serve to
a) validate Le Camp's pricing
b) offer alternatives (not necessarily
On 08/10/12 23:37, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> I'm sure it's not necessary to repeat the back-up venues[1]
>
> However, as it feels like there is something of an impasse over the
> contract and budget, I thought I would see what else exists
>
> I found a few other li
On 11/10/12 19:28, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:12:56 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>> I just committed (SVN r3732 [1]) the version of the contract Le Camp
>> sent us with the our last comments. Since the original is in French, I
>> quickly translated it to English, ple
On 12/10/12 13:49, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/12 19:28, Luca Capello wrote:
>>
>>> Here a resume of the problems, please correct me if I am wrong or if I
>>> have missed s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've just visited Interlaken this morning.
My initial impression is that:
a) it is a viable alternative - it is not necessarily cheaper, but it
would work just as well as Le Camp
b) there may be more flexibility in the contract - no need to pay f
I've put my findings about Interlaken on the wiki page:
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Interlaken
The only thing I am still waiting for is a detailed price list from the
potential venue - I will share that when it is available.
___
Debcon
The discussion on IRC suggests there is not universal support for the
DC13 budget around Le Camp's contract
There is also an alternative Swiss option emerging (Interlaken) which
may or may not address some of the concerns
I would propose for the next meeting we need to reach a decision on
crit
I prepared some slides for my discussions with potential partners in
Interlaken and I feel they worked well.
I've added them in SVN
svn+ssh://u...@svn.debian.org/svn/debconf-data/misc/partner-development/partner-prospectus
These are generic enough for any year, people preparing DC14 bids may
Whether self-cooking is viable or not for DC13 (or beyond) is not
completely clear to me.
I've heard different opinions and so I've created a wiki page with some
of the possible risks and opportunities:
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/SelfCooking
Of particular note is the `hybrid' possibility
There are some meetings lined up in Interlaken on 26 October (next
Friday, the day before BSP)
I realise it is late notice for people, but as we are expecting at least
one visitor (Holger), and one of the venues closes from 29 October, it
really needs to happen next week.
Please email me if
I've received a proposal from Jungfrau Park in Interlaken
It has been committed in SVN
svn+ssh://u...@svn.debian.org/svn/debconf-data/dc13/venue-evaluation/interlaken
Initial observations:
- 16 August they have another event, and 17 August they need to work in
the Pegasus room. We could con
Jungfrau Park management provided the following comments about internet.
We need to tell them the minimum and the preferred bandwidth for them
to get quotes:
So now I have answers about the internet.
- which type of connection do you have? Cable TV Glass fiber
- how many megabits? 5MB
- w
I've just received the quote from Kongress Centre Kursaal
It is now in SVN:
svn+ssh://u...@svn.debian.org/svn/debconf-data/dc13/venue-evaluation/interlaken
It is more expensive, but the brochure gives a very detailed overview of
Interlaken, not just the Kongress Centre
My initial feeling is t
On 18/10/12 13:42, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>
>> My personal opinion is that LeCamp is still the most probable venue and that
>> sponsors don't care "that much" about the place. So if we drop "Vaumarcus /
>> Le
>> Camp" from t
On 18/10/12 14:34, Raphael Walther wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I had an interesting conversation with somebody from "Trois-lacs et
> Jura" [1] which is the tourist office responsible for Vaumarcus.
>
> She told me it may be possible to get support from them because our
> event has an international im
In the region of Vaumarcus:
http://www.myswitzerland.com/en/video/index.cfm?id=2301
The video includes an interesting quote: "here, those who are stressed
out will find the relaxation they have been looking for"
For Interlaken, this video covers some of the venues mentioned on the
wiki, and
On 20/10/12 12:00, Raphael Walther wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Le jeudi 18 octobre 2012 à 14:42 +0200, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>
>> I think we should apply for sponsorship for both possible cantons/venues
>> - they are both valid options if we get sponsorship
>>
fficial partner, this does not seem unreasonable
for us. Nonetheless, this is an initial quote and may be subject to
further negotiation.
Regards,
Daniel
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
On 20/10/12 16:29, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le samedi, 20 octobre 2012 14.03:15, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>
>> Average rate is 25 CHF/night including breakfast and bus pass.
>>
>> I believe this is highly competitive, as they would normally charge
>>
I've prepared a spreadsheet and wiki comparing the budget and high level
issues for DC13 in CH:
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/VenueComparison
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debconf-data/dc13/venue-evaluation/cashflow-alternatives.xls
___
De
On 21/10/12 17:22, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:33:24 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I've prepared a spreadsheet
> ^^^
> [...]
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debconf-data/dc13/venue-eval
I used the Vaumarcus checklist as a template for creating an Interlaken
checklist:
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Switzerland/Bid/Vaumarcus
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/InterlakenChecklist
While going through it, I noticed some issues:
"Visas: Which/how many countries' cit
I've added a fundraising wiki page:
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Fundraising
I've added the links I found for Interlaken and also the link supplied
by Raphael.
Does anyone have links for the Swiss foundations that have been mentioned?
_
On 22/10/12 13:19, Raphael Walther wrote:
> Hi everyone !
> Le lundi 22 octobre 2012 à 12:37 +0200, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>>
>>
>> I've added a fundraising wiki page:
>>
>> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Fundraising
>>
>> I'v
I understand that there is not widespread support for the registration
fee concept at face value
However, there is some benefit to advertising such a fee, and then
`sponsoring' individuals by waiving the fee for them.
The main benefit is that DebConf can ask people to `find their own
sponsor' b
On 22/10/12 15:36, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Daniel Pocock writes:
>
>> I used the Vaumarcus checklist as a template for creating an Interlaken
>> checklist:
>>
>> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Switzerland/Bid/Vaumarcus
>>
>> http://wiki.debc
1 - 100 of 524 matches
Mail list logo
