On 15/08/12 15:41, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi there! > > On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:01:20 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 03:08:51PM +0100, Nattie Mayer-Hutchings wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:37:45PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>>> But the issue of attendance during the DebCamp week has very real >>>> financial implications - you don't think it is worth looking at options >>>> to mitigate such risks? >>> >>> As much as your willingness to be helpful is appreciated, there has recently >>> been a very productive and positive meeting with the management of >>> LeCamp, >> >> I understood it such that his suggestions (and fears) are exactly >> based on the outcome of that meeting. Especially the minimum average >> of 200 beds is something which came up after that meeting. (c.f. >> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Meetings/minutes-20120814#Conclusions, >> first item) > > That is not true: the fact that there was a minimum amount of money to > have the *whole* venue for ourselves was known since the very first > meeting we had with 'Le Camp'. By chance, this happened to coincide > with the average number of attendees I used to calculate the initial > rough budget (notes 1 and 3): > > > <http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Switzerland/Bid#Rough_budget_calculations>
I'm not suggesting this 200 average was a new issue - I definitely remember it was mentioned before Tuesday as well _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
