Hey John-Paul,
If you're looking to hack on the chef recipes on the admin node, then this is
an easy way to do it:
1. Make your changes in /opt/dell/chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb
2. Upload your changes to the chef server:
a. cd /opt/dell/chef/cookbooks
b. knife co
Disclaimer: I am not a github expert.
Regarding branch lifecycle:
1. Work on the release being actively developed continues in a branch
2. When that release is shipped, another branch is made so that active
development on the next release can continue in one branch, and critical fixes
Hey guys,
Unless there is a compelling reason for doing this (and I haven't heard one), I
would propose that we leave everything as-is. I don't see a need for doing
this.
Thanks,
Chris
Dell
-Original Message-
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Thomas Boerger
Sent: Wednesday, March 1
Hey Daniel,
Are you using the Mesa 1.6.1 release? There were 2 networking issues that we
found and corrected while testing Mesa 1.6.1. Not sure if these issues exist
in Mesa 1.6 or not, but if you are using Mesa 1.6, then switching to Mesa 1.6.1
may resolve your problems. The issues involved
Rob,
I think you misunderstood my recommendation below. What I'm proposing is that
we branch everything, including the main Crowbar repo. See my responses to
your points below.
At this point in time, I'm not seeing the benefit of creating a new org since
everything that we want done can be d
Hey Shane,
Unfortunately there isn't a way to specify discontiguous numbers in a range,
and multiple "host" statements are not presently supported.
Thanks,
Chris
Dell
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Shane Gibson
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 2:22 PM
To: crowbar
Subject: [Crowbar] more
Hui,
I would first check to see if the node appears in the chef GUI or not so at
least you can tell if the problem is on the Chef side or the Crowbar side.
Check /var/log/chef/server.log on the admin node to see if there are related
errors there. You may need to copy a key file from the PXE b
I agree that we need to get rid of the releases dir in the root crowbar repo
and begin branching all repos (including the root crowbar repo) per release.
The way it is currently structured leads to collisions between releases.
For example, Mesa and Roxy now require two different versions of Ubu
Hey Hui,
Arkady is on a well-deserved vacation for a couple weeks.
Crowbar is designed to have bare metal servers PXE boot directly from it. It
really doesn't support deploying to non-bare metal servers at this point in
time.
That said, if you're feeling ambitious, it may be possible to make
Hey Daniel,
So your network json looks like it's in good shape. What's happening is that
the conduit map for dual mode, intf1 maps to the 2nd NIC (?1g2), but, there is
no 2nd NIC available.
Can you double check to make sure you have a 2nd NIC in the system?
It's possible that you do have a 2n
Hey Daniel,
This error:
Recipe Compile Error in /var/cache/chef/cookbooks/network/recipes/default.rb
ArgumentError
-
Condu
Hey Daniel,
If Quantum itself is failing, then you should have logs in /var/log/quantum on
whatever node you selected when deploying the quantum barclamp. You probably
picked your controller node.
It's possible that a failure occurred before this. In that case, look on your
admin node in /op
Daniel,
Glad to hear that you're past the Cinder issue!
If you send along the logs from /var/log/quantum on the network node, I can
take a look.
Thanks,
Chris
Dell Inc
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Daniel San Pedro
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 11:45 AM
To: Jakesch, Simon
Cc: crowbar
Hey folks,
Was working on a bug yesterday that occurs when you are using the Neutron
barclamp with the OVS plugin in GRE mode.
The issue is that when a Nova compute node is rebooted, the Neutron networking
on the node comes up in a broken state, which causes networking to fail for the
VMs that
Thanks for the great information Victor! I have a few questions that hopefully
you’ll be able to answer. See below…
Thanks,
Chris
Dell Inc
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Victor Lowther
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 7:56 PM
To: crowbar
Subject: [Crowbar] Crowbar 2.0 Status Report
A
Hey John-Paul,
I can clarify the installation process for you:
When you want to set up an admin node on a virtual machine, you can put the ISO
in the DVD drive of the VM and boot directly from the ISO. This results in the
OS being installed on the admin node VM. The next step is to:
s
Hey Dirk,
An issue that we've been having is that the smoketest has been broken on the
pebbles branch. As a result, all pull requests were being tested by hand,
which drastically slowed things down (plus we had an all-hands team meeting all
last week). I've been working on fixing the smoke te
Hey Volkan,
ssh into the node and look in /var/log/chef/client.log
Take a look in /var/log/syslog too to see if anything's there.
Also, while on the node, you can run:
sudo chef-client
Which will run chef client and give you immediate feedback as to what's going
wrong. Note that the output of
A couple of comments:
I agree with RalfH & Vincent that code review comments should be via github,
but I think that any patch that changes existing functionality/UI should be
discussed on the mailing list or IRC.
In the Code Review Cases section, it seems like the most important review will
be
How about discussing the proposed coding standards?
Chris
Dell
-Original Message-
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Judd Maltin
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:28 PM
To: crowbar
Subject: [Crowbar] Agenda Suggestions for Community Call Tomorrow?
ohai crowbarbarians,
Please let us know
Looks good to me too!
Chris
Dell
-Original Message-
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Terpstra, John
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 8:56 AM
To: vu...@suse.com; crowbar
Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Adding a public hostname attribute to each node
LGTM.
- John T.
John H Terpstra
Cloud Services
Vincent,
How would $PUBLIC_HOSTNAME be set? Would this be a new field exposed in the
node edit screen? Would it be defaulted to anything?
Thanks,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 4:12 AM
To: crowbar
Subject: [Cr
Hey Sebastian,
Ouch! That definitely won't work. The code in that repo is pretty old. There
have been quite a few changes in the mesa 1.6 release since rc1, so the safest
thing to do would be to build and install a new iso.
That said, if you want to try dropping in a new quantum barclamp, ge
Hey Sebastian,
I recently fixed a bug that would cause quantum to sometimes fail due to a race
condition of sorts:
https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-quantum/pull/73
This was merged into pebbles last Friday (6/28), so I'm sure it's not in the
RC1 build. I'm guessing that this is what you are
Hey Jeff,
What branch are you building? Pebbles/openstack-os-build and
mesa-1.6/openstack-os-build should both be working.
Thanks,
Chris
Dell
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Jeffrey Jones
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 1:15 AM
To: crowbar
Subject: [Crowbar] Quantum Proposal Failing
I've
Hey Greg,
Can you ssh into the admin node, sudo -i, and then run "chef-client"? It will
probably fail, and I'm hoping that it will give a more informative error than
the one below.
Thanks,
Chris
Dell
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Jacobs, Greg
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 4:54 PM
To: c
There's no question that it could be completed in pebbles, and the only thing
blocking this from happening is people to work on it.
I believe the issue is that quantum bumps heads with the vlans we use in the
network barclamp, though Victor could give more details.
Chris
-Original Messag
It's not really a bug. It's a feature that was not completed, hence why it
should be removed.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:48 AM
To: crowbar
Subject: Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-quantum] Removed vlan option from q
Sounds good to me!
-Original Message-
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Kanevsky, Arkady
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 4:16 PM
To: aspi...@suse.com; crowbar
Subject: Re: [Crowbar] multi-proposal in pebbles
Adam,
There are many issues.
First, nobody really tried it for all barclamps.
We tri
There are several barclamps that still have sqlite code in them. When we
decided not to support sqlite, I believe it was just removed from the GUI, and
the back end code was left in - at least in some cases.
I'm all up for removing it, but it will of course require extra work.
Chris
-Or
I agree. I'm struggling to understand why things are being redesigned at this
stage.
Regarding the design changes to the network barclamp, it sounds like conduits
will still exist and that they will just be represented as roles in the model
instead of being explicitly represented as Conduits/C
Sorry about that, and thanks for pointing out the omission Marin!
I've updated this page appropriately on the wiki:
https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Crowbar-tree-branch-structure
Thanks,
Chris
Software Developer
Dell
-Original Message-
From: Marin Orlić [mailto:marin.or...@gmai
Hey Tim,
Looking at the code in
crowbar/barclamps/ipmi/chef/cookbooks/bmc-nat/recipes/client.rb, line 31 is:
code "ip route add #{bmc_subnet}/#{bmc_netmask} via #{nat_address}"
So it looks like it wants to put the bmc subnet IP in that line prior to the
"/". In your error message below, it lo
Hey Marin,
It sounds like you are having the misfortune of trying to use branches that are
currently under development! Development/openstack-os-build is our Crowbar 2.0
branch that we are currently working on. It will be the next major release of
Crowbar, and it is in a not very functional s
Hey Jeff,
If you want to repurpose a node that has been allocated and had some proposals
applied to it, then you should remove the node from any policies that it is in,
and then delete the node. When you reboot it, it should PXE boot and be
discovered again. At that point, you should be able
Hey James,
These were the 2 errors:
5) Failure:
test_find_network:_consistency_check_of_network_id_failure(NetworkUtilsTest)
[/home/travis/build/crowbar/travis-ci-crowbar/crowbar_framework/test/unit/network_utils_test.rb:65]:
There is no Deployment with id default.
<400> expected but was
<404>.
I took a look at this issue, and the problem is that translation is not working
properly in the Travis test setup.
A new migration was added that creates the default network barclamp deployment.
In that migration, I initially used Barclamp::DEFAULT_DEPLOYMENT_NAME for the
name of the deploymen
Guys,
I'm looking at this issue right now, and the problem is not an assert
statement. Those were fixed in an earlier pull request. I know what the issue
is and am working on an email now.
Thanks,
Chris
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Hirschfeld, Rob
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:01
I submitted a pull request that should resolve most of these issues
(https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-network/pull/158). That pull was merged
on Friday, but does not appear to be in this build.
Could whoever is managing the Travis builds take a look?
Thanks,
Chris
Dell
From: crowbar-boun
I've looked at the current routes.rb, and it's unclear to me what the routing
pattern would be for the per barclamp routes file. Can you elaborate?
-Original Message-
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Victor Lowther
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 6:13 PM
To: Paterson, David
Cc: crowbar
S
This pull doesn't address the original problem that the network_test_helper.rb
is not being copied into the crowbar_framework/test directory as a result of
running dev setup-unit-tests or dev reload-unit-tests, whichever is supposed to
do it. Rob's temporary hack was to just check in a copy of
Hey Adam,
Just ran the unit tests via "bundle exec rake test:units" and "dev
run-unit-tests", and all the unit tests passed in both cases. Spoke with Andi,
and he ran into the same problem over the weekend. He believes the issue is a
difference between the behavior of Marshal in Ruby 1.8 and
Hey Adam,
FYI: I just took an update and diffed the two network_test_helpers:
crowbar/barclamps/network/crowbar_engine/barclamp_network/test/network_test_helper.rb
and
crowbar/barclamps/crowbar/crowbar_framework/test/network_test_helper.rb
and they are identical.
Will look at the test failure
Hi Guillaume,
Yes, you can have multiple proposals for the same barclamp in Crowbar 1.x.
Exceptions to this are for some of the barclamps that are core to Crowbar, such
as the network barclamp, which limit themselves to 1 proposal.
Chris
Dell
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Guillaume Pola
44 matches
Mail list logo
