Great comparison. More interesting - take a look at the rudder. In all cases
they have the shoal draft rudder which would work with the centerboard model.
This is the same thing we saw on our 51 of similar vintage. Apparently they
would change the keel but not alter the rudder. Rob Ball han
Great comparison. More interesting - take a look at the rudder. In all cases
they have the shoal draft rudder which would work with the centerboard model.
This is the same thing we saw on our 51 of similar vintage. Apparently they
would change the keel but not alter the rudder. Rob Ball han
All,
It's with a sad heart I list our boat. I bought her just 2 years ago and racked
up some big yard bills, thinking we'd have her forever. Now we're moving to
Cincinnati for work and it just doesn't make sense to manage a boat from afar.
So I'm listing her for what I paid for her, about half o
http://tampa.craigslist.org/hil/boa/4676807715.html
--
*Best regards,*
*Curtis McDaniel, *
*C&C 30-MK1 East Coast Lady*
*Port Royal,*
*South Carolina*
*cpt.b...@gmail.com *
* __/) *
.
___
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Alb
Take a look at the three illustrations linked below:
This is the drawing for the 37+ (also known as the 37/40+, and after 1992,
the 40+)
http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=5997
Notice the "Beaver Tail" on the bottom of the keel. This is the 7' 3" (or
4") draft keel.
Now look at th
I concur with the measurement suggestion. Also I would not be surprised to find
that the cb boat of any C&C 'series' might actually have a deeper draft than
its 'racer/fin keel' equivalent model.
Charlie Nelson
Water Phantom
C&C 36 XL/kcb
1995
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 26, 2014, at 7:10
Checked Yachtworld and found other 37/40's for sale w 7' 3" draft. Maybe C&C
changed the production after the brochures were printed? Maybe Mars Metals made
a change? Maybe owners changed the keels?
I'd check with a tape measure from the waterline to the keel bottom tip.
My boat was supposed t
Dave,
Owning an older 38, I can't comment on the attributes or value of the 37+.
Other than to say I'm envious of the aft cabin and shower that don't fit into
my IOR hull. But I can comment on two other areas.
First, you estimated $20k to reduce the draft of the boat. I reduced the draft
of IM
Around here, you would not get away with a roller furler gennaker in JAM. You
must be using sails which would be classified as jibs, which means the
mid-girth measurement has to be 50% or less than the foot. Anything over that,
it is a spinnaker (actually not, because they don't allow anything b
David
A genniker is technically a spinnaker.
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of David
Roberts via CnC-List
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 11:41 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List C&C 37/40 + Pricing (
Thanks for all the GREAT input. This l
Sounds like a setup for a very long list of things to fix to do it right.
I'd be extremely weary of the engine among other things..
It would certainly take a very extensive survey..
That long out of commission, I would not pay a dime over 45K. It sounds
like it will realistically take an easy
Thanks for all the GREAT input. This list is by far the best email list I have
ever read. I look forward to being a real member by owning a C&C. Anyhow a few
corrections to my post.
1. The boat is owned by the dealer they took it on trade
2. They did replace the floor boards, or at least r
All,
I’m a proud owner as well and, like Josh, the Enterprise has gotten me
through some bad conditions without a single sign of stress.
As to the thing that got this all started off, it sounds like, based on
what you wrote, that it’s a little high priced. At the Rendezvous las
We just bought our 1989 C&C 37+ CB this summer from South Florida. She was
in beautiful condition and a thorough survey by a C&C experienced surveyor
found no major issues. Our electronics are fairly new and all systems are
working well. Our sail inventory is good: 2 year old main, older but decent
Teak and holly is about $300 a sheet. An engine is probably15,000. The
small things add up,, but start with the big items and work your way down.
You will need a battery to see if thee engine will even turn over.
Joel
On Friday, September 26, 2014, Chuck S via CnC-List
wrote:
> Jake,
> A #2
Jake,
A #2 should be plenty big for cruising and beer can racing.
We raced our 34R w a #2 very sucessfully. A #1 would have helped in the under 5
knot races, but we didn't need as many crew on the rail w the smaller sail. Our
#2 is cut as a 144% and full hoist so it is very close to the 150%. T
The MkI boats probably had thicker floor boards?
The teak and holly sole for the 1989 boats are veneered and the top layer is
paper thin. I refinished mine and sanded through in a few places, because it is
so thin. If the original was not sealed and it sat underwater for a long time,
it could b
Mine has gotten me through some pretty deep crap. No problems. Proud
owner.
Josh Muckley
S/V Sea Hawk
1989 C&C 37+
Solomons, MD
On Sep 26, 2014 1:38 AM, "Us via CnC-List" wrote:
> Considering all of the other production boats on the market and knowing
> the way these boats are built in compari
Sounds like a setup for a very long list of things to fix to do it right. I'd be extremely weary of the engine among other things..
It would certainly take a very extensive survey..
Beautiful boat, but many things on it tend to be big and pricey..
That long out of commission, I would not pay a dim
19 matches
Mail list logo
