+1
Regards,
Sateesh
"This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized revi
On 10/08/2012, at 8:59 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> First, I apologize for bringing up another non-release related
> discussion topic.
>
> There have been a couple of times where the issue of the existing
> cloudstack.org email addresses have come up - and it's now on our todo
> lis
On 10/08/2012, at 4:25 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 02:04:41PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
>> On 08/09/2012 01:00 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>> I'm pleased to say that I received a rapid response on
>>> legal-discuss from Greg Stein:
>>>
>>> "The ASL 1.1 license became
On 09/08/2012, at 10:45 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I originally thought that Selenium was just added as a convenience for
> future testing plans
> (tools/tooljars/cloud-selenium-java-client-driver.jar) but it seems it
> is actually a dependency for the compile-testclient target.
>
+1
I agree.
Kelven
On 8/9/12 4:39 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:11 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some add
Hi Ewan,
I have asked the concerned people in Brocade to respond to the licensing
issues. I will get back to you soon.
Thanks,
Krishna
-Original Message-
From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 4:29 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 10/08/2012, at 10:46 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> PMC chairs/officers can; so one of our mentors can do so.
>>
>> Mentors: if no one objects in the near future, can you fill out
>> https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator
>>
>> N
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Schweikert [mailto:rjsch...@suse.com]
>>
>> [Snip]
>>
>> > * We want to be able to package CloudStack in RPMs and .debs that
>> correctly depend on packages available on the target platform.
>>
>> This
> In basic mode, security groups are used for segregation but VMs are only
> allowed one network to live in. Why? Why couldn't an instance in basic
> mode belong to multiple networks?
No good reason. My comment about the ready availability of good-enough
hardware was not meant to imply that I su
On 10/08/2012, at 10:46 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> PMC chairs/officers can; so one of our mentors can do so.
>
> Mentors: if no one objects in the near future, can you fill out
> https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator
>
> Name: cloudstack-builds@i.a.o
> Mods: I'll volunteer to be a m
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Schweikert [mailto:rjsch...@suse.com]
>
> [Snip]
>
> > * We want to be able to package CloudStack in RPMs and .debs that
> correctly depend on packages available on the target platform.
>
> This is IMHO not a "job" of the project. This is up to the packa
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 5:33 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Automated emails
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Ewan Mellor
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 5:33 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Automated emails
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Ewan Mellor
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've got various Jenkins jobs
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've got various Jenkins jobs now, and these are going to be useful for
> telling us when the build breaks or when tests fail. I was planning to turn
> the email notification on as soon as these jobs are stable and passing.
>
> W
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>
> [Snip]
>
> Thinking about the milestone along those lines, I agree that cutting a
> release branch over the weekend is a good thing. This is specifically
> because of the pending review board submissions tha
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Infra already runs planetapache, so there might be a way to reuse some of
> that if another is set up on a VM.
>
> Another option is that the project can blog on our Roller install. It's less
> individual / distributed, but good for official
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:11 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some
Infra already runs planetapache, so there might be a way to reuse some of that
if another is set up on a VM.
Another option is that the project can blog on our Roller install. It's less
individual / distributed, but good for official communication and can be done
now: http://blogs.apache.org/
Separate list. Eg cloud stack-build@
Looks like Orion SSH2 is a fork of trilead (which used to be ganymed). Also
looks like Jenkins have forked Trilead:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/trilead-ssh2/
AFAIK, all of them are BSD and should be fine, unless you have a commercial
version of Trilead. Was there a problem identified?
I've us
Hi all,
We've got various Jenkins jobs now, and these are going to be useful for
telling us when the build breaks or when tests fail. I was planning to turn
the email notification on as soon as these jobs are stable and passing.
What do people want me to do with the email notification for thes
On 10/08/2012, at 12:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
wrote:
>
> There are no issues with the apache confluence. Probably better than
> wiki.cloudstack because it still does wiki markup rather than just
> rich text edits. Pages might look differently-formatted so wanted to
> alert people.
Ah, that's
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:11 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional
> thoughts
>
> > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> >
Hi Krishna,
First of all, thanks for the patch! It's great to see Brocade getting involved
in CloudStack, and I hope that you will be able to do more in the future too.
I don't know if you know this, but we're trying to get a CloudStack 4.0 release
together in the next month. The deadline for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6502/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kelven Yang.
Description
---
For VMware h
> Switches are dirt cheap. Even if you do have the world's sorriest excuse
> of switching technology.
I think also this becomes a matter of principle in the sense that you can
easily to this _without_ CloudStack and vanilla Xen/XCP/HV of choice. So why
does installing CS impose a limit on wha
> Switches are dirt cheap. Even if you do have the world's sorriest excuse
> of switching technology.
I think really this is more a matter of principle at this point than a matter
of budget. Scaling limitations of VLANs aside (which is what SDN is there as
an option to resolve), it's a questi
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>>
>> [Snip]
>>
>> The thread started because the current system isn't really a system,
>> it's just a folder full of binary jars which we were advised against
>> (and saw
Hi folks,
First, I apologize for bringing up another non-release related
discussion topic.
There have been a couple of times where the issue of the existing
cloudstack.org email addresses have come up - and it's now on our todo
list[1]
== The current situation ==
cloudstack.org currently provid
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:57 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source
> releases.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Na
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>
> [Snip]
>
> The thread started because the current system isn't really a system,
> it's just a folder full of binary jars which we were advised against
> (and saw another incubator project taken to task by the IPMC). As I
>
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Matthew Patton wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:26:02 -0400, Outback Dingo
> wrote:
>
>
>> we dont have VLAN capable switches
>
>
> I rather doubt that. Every tom dick and harry switch manufacturer of even
> the cheapest PoS I've run across knows what to do with VLA
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:17 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source
>> releases.
>>
>
On Aug 9, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>>> Hi Chip,
>>>
>>> I am almost through the entire build.
>>>
>>> However puppet seems stuck at:
>>>
>>> notice:
>>> /Stage[main]/Puppet-d
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>> Hi Chip,
>>
>> I am almost through the entire build.
>>
>> However puppet seems stuck at:
>>
>> notice:
>> /Stage[main]/Puppet-devcloud/File[/opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1]/ensure:
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6500/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Adds Apache license to all n
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> On 8/9/12 1:52 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/9/12 1:05 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>>>
Frank,
There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checkin
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, sebgoa wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I am almost through the entire build.
>
> However puppet seems stuck at:
>
> notice:
> /Stage[main]/Puppet-devcloud/File[/opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1]/ensure:
> created
>
> Downloading the tinylinux VM ?
>
> -Sebastien
>
>
On 8/9/12 1:52 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
> wrote:
>> On 8/9/12 1:05 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>>
>>>Frank,
>>>
>>>There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checking to see
>>>if the XStream Library can be removed. I still see it i
On Aug 9, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Matthew Patton wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:26:02 -0400, Outback Dingo
> wrote:
>
>
>> we dont have VLAN capable switches
>
> I rather doubt that. Every tom dick and harry switch manufacturer of even the
> cheapest PoS I've run across knows what to do with VLA
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:26:02 -0400, Outback Dingo
wrote:
we dont have VLAN capable switches
I rather doubt that. Every tom dick and harry switch manufacturer of even
the cheapest PoS I've run across knows what to do with VLAN tags. What you
can't do, is control at the port level which
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> On 8/9/12 1:05 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>>Frank,
>>
>>There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checking to see
>>if the XStream Library can be removed. I still see it in the repo.
>>
>>It's a BSD license, so I don't thin
On 8/9/12 1:05 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Frank,
>
>There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checking to see
>if the XStream Library can be removed. I still see it in the repo.
>
>It's a BSD license, so I don't think it's an issue. However, I don't
>want to add it to the NOTICE an
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:40 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2012, at 3:55 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:03 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child
On Aug 9, 2012, at 3:55 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:03 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>>
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:31
That was me. I let it slip onto the back burner but will see what progress I
can make this week.
John
On Aug 9, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> I know that there's a LOT going on right now, so blogging may not be top
> of mind for folks - but it'd be good if we could get this sorted o
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Patton wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:09:30 -0400, Hugo Trippaers
> wrote:
>
>> I think I have the clear picture now. I think there is a valid use case
>> for having the option to create 'internal' networks (networks that have no
>> outside connectivity s
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:17 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source
> releases.
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
+1 I agree,
Getting this going before September would be awesome and help push the
Apache CloudStack brand to a wider audience for the 4.0 release.
Kelcey Jamison-Damage
Infrastructure Systems Architect
Backbone Technology | Backbone Datavault | Backbone IT Services
55 East 7th Ave Vancouver -
Looks like a pretty dusty library. Why not sshj?
-A
On Aug 9, 2012 1:01 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > Ram / Kevin,
> >
> > I see in my email archive, that you two were discussing having a
> > Citrix engineer work on removing the Trilead
I know that there's a LOT going on right now, so blogging may not be top
of mind for folks - but it'd be good if we could get this sorted out.
While everyone is working on getting 4.0 out the door is *exactly* when
it'd be good if folks were blogging about what they're doing and perhaps
helping to
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 03:09:30 -0400, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
I think I have the clear picture now. I think there is a valid use case
for having the option to create 'internal' networks (networks that have
no outside connectivity so no SourceNat service)
You "think"? Do people here not have
Frank,
There is a note on the dependency wiki page about you checking to see
if the XStream Library can be removed. I still see it in the repo.
It's a BSD license, so I don't think it's an issue. However, I don't
want to add it to the NOTICE and LICENSE files unless we plan on
keeping it for th
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Ram / Kevin,
>
> I see in my email archive, that you two were discussing having a
> Citrix engineer work on removing the Trilead ssh library from the
> project. Have you been able to get that going?
>
> The latest comment on the "Actions" col
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 9:39 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DOCS: problems with using entities
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:46 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just a quick update on this. I created the deps-ctrl branch off of
> master now that I actually have something to show.
>
> If you take a look under deps you'll see it looks pretty bare. I've
> removed a number of the jars.
>
> T
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:22 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> Pradeep / Edison,
>>
>> I see that the source patch was applied, but the jar file is still in
>> the deps folder. Can I remove it?
>>
>> I'm asking, because I just hit the JnetPcap ro
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Pradeep / Edison,
>
> I see that the source patch was applied, but the jar file is still in
> the deps folder. Can I remove it?
>
> I'm asking, because I just hit the JnetPcap row in the dependencies wiki page.
>
> If yes, I'll remove from th
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 21:51:50 -0400, Edison Su wrote:
From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com]
...
For following scenarios I need some suggestions:
a) 'vm snapshot, detach volume and attach it to another VM, rollback
snapshot',
This is not a problem. A volume and it's (several) s
Ram / Kevin,
I see in my email archive, that you two were discussing having a
Citrix engineer work on removing the Trilead ssh library from the
project. Have you been able to get that going?
The latest comment on the "Actions" column of the deps wiki page
notes: XXX remove and use another ssh c
Pradeep / Edison,
I see that the source patch was applied, but the jar file is still in
the deps folder. Can I remove it?
I'm asking, because I just hit the JnetPcap row in the dependencies wiki page.
If yes, I'll remove from the source tree and from the tracking page.
Thanks!
-chip
On Thu,
Yes. Refer to the review description.
From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:33 AM
To: Koushik Das
Cc: Radhika Nair; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Does the fix for CS-15631 affect documentation?
Koushik,
Do you think this chang
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Chip,
>
> I've removed the Base64 file from the utils branch.
>
>> Sun Licenses:
>> Alex is working on removing these files, and pulling in a jar during
>> build.
>> We'll need to add the CDDL licensing to the NOTICE file once that work's
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 02:04:41PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 01:00 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > I'm pleased to say that I received a rapid response on
> > legal-discuss from Greg Stein:
> >
> > "The ASL 1.1 license became the AL 2.0 license by dropping the
> > "Software" ter
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>>
>> awsapi/.classpath
>> utils/.classpath
>> Alex, can you please correct these files? The headers were removed by a
>> commit you made yesterday.
>>
> It will take me a little time today as I'm in a all day meeting. Will
> checkin aft
>
> awsapi/.classpath
> utils/.classpath
> Alex, can you please correct these files? The headers were removed by a
> commit you made yesterday.
>
It will take me a little time today as I'm in a all day meeting. Will checkin
after work.
--Alex
+1
This is what drove us to choose the vendor SDK originally.
Kelven
On 8/9/12 10:36 AM, "Will Chan" wrote:
>> From: Matthew Patton [mailto:mpat...@inforelay.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:20 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/2012 01:00 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> I'm pleased to say that I received a rapid response on
> legal-discuss from Greg Stein:
>
> "The ASL 1.1 license became the AL 2.0 license by dropping the
> "Software" term. The ALv2 is applicable to do
> From: David Nalley
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 6:08 AM
>Subject: Re: CloudStack gathering around LinuxConNA?
>
>On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
>> On 06/05/2012 11:32 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at
Put up on reviewborad https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/. Please review and
provide feedback.
Implementation based on [1] below. The hierarchical configuration that was
discussed for enabling local storage support at multiple levels
(pod/cluster/host) can be added as another checkin.
Thanks,
Ko
Thanks for your feedback.
Here are list of capabilities in the current patch:
* There is no virtual appliance for ADX as of now. The Virtual ADX itself is in
development. So CloudStack support for software LB is not available in this
patch.
* Brocade ADX will be LB provider in advanced zone only
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/
---
(Updated Aug. 9, 2012, 5:45 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prat
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Jason Bausewein
wrote:
> It's an honor to work with you guys. Thanks for letting me contribute to
> such a great project.
>
> Jason
Congratulations Jason!
-chip
> From: Matthew Patton [mailto:mpat...@inforelay.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional
> thoughts
> Pardon my ignorance but why on earth would you NOT use the vendor
> SDK/A
It's an honor to work with you guys. Thanks for letting me contribute to such
a great project.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:13 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: new committer: Jason Bausewein
Th
Am working on it.
Done removing EC2 from Hibernate dependency. Committed the patch locally and
testing is almost done.
Will send patch for the same by tomorrow.
Removing Hibernate dependency in S3 project is going on. I would be sending the
patch for it by end of this week.
Thanks
Rajesh Batta
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:10:47 -0400, Will Chan wrote:
The issue with using some open source version of the vmware SDK is that
it is not as well tested as the official one.
Pardon my ignorance but why on earth would you NOT use the vendor SDK/API
or even their CLI tools? The point of cloud a
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Jason Bausewein to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since
there is no need to go via the patch submission process.
I'm later than normal today, sorry about that. Lots of meetings this
morning. Keep in mind that this list is for source files only, and
doesn't represent the outstanding issues with binary dependencies.
Specific individuals that have open questions to them below: Alex,
Prachi, Frank, Ewan
Upda
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:58 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional
> thoughts
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> > I prefer the same option "
I'm pleased to say that I received a rapid response on legal-discuss
from Greg Stein:
"The ASL 1.1 license became the AL 2.0 license by dropping the
"Software" term. The ALv2 is applicable to documentation. Please use
that for all doc.
Cheers,
-g"
See: http://markmail.org/message/wswgys56yelbd44
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Will Chan wrote:
> I prefer the same option "remove VMware SDK from the build" idea as well. I
> wouldn't even go as far as adding in other libraries. If people want to use
> VMWare, I am hoping we can just give them additional instructions on how to
> do that
I prefer the same option "remove VMware SDK from the build" idea as well. I
wouldn't even go as far as adding in other libraries. If people want to use
VMWare, I am hoping we can just give them additional instructions on how to do
that.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Mice Xia [mai
This is what I sent to legal-discuss. I'll report back if I get any
response.
- Forwarded message from Joe Brockmeier -
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:00:08 +
From: Joe Brockmeier
To: Apache Legal
Subject: Documentation Licenses: CC-BY-SA 3.0?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
The Cl
> Ah, thanks! That gets me a bit further:
>
> Beginning work on en-US
> Validation failed:
> cloudstack.xml:6: validity error : Element book content does not follow the
> DTD, expecting ((title , subtitle? , titleabbrev?)? , bookinfo? ,
> (dedication | toc | lot | glossary | bibliography | preface
Having worked with the cloudbridge, and experimented ripping out soap, s3,
duplicated or unreferenced code, the module becomes quite small, apart from
generated classes. There is hardly any state, and certainly not highly
relational state.
What I'm getting at is that I see no reason to make small
On 08/09/2012 03:30 PM, David Nalley wrote:
My first idea is to get publican actually build some docs locally..
wido@wido-desktop:~/repos/cloudstack/docs$ publican build --formats test
--langs en-US --config=publican-all.cfg
Failed to load brand file:
/usr/share/publican/Common_Content/cloudstac
Not often at all. I simply set the unsolicited requests to 30s to prove out.
default is os default centos 6.2.
All the IPs share the same MAC and the gateway should not be "moving".
Again, no issues from a centos guest using it directly as a gateway. Issues
only when the VR is using it as a gat
On 08/09/2012 07:04 AM, John Kinsella wrote:
I think this is a great conversation to have, but maybe we should wait until
after the 4.0 release? Seems like it might be a bit of a distraction right now…
I have to agree on this. I'm not against this, but for me imho it's
rather hard to keep up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/2012 11:12 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:46:51PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
>> The defacto standard FLOSS license for documentation is the
>> Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license[0] which has been specifically
>> desi
Rajesh, is this done?
--David
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Rajesh Battala
wrote:
> Yes Ewan, I would be doing this work.
>
> Thanks
> Rajesh Battala
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:03 AM
>> To: cloudst
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:46:51PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
> The defacto standard FLOSS license for documentation is the Creative
> Commons CC-BY-SA license[0] which has been specifically designed for
> documentation, both in source and final-form documents. Using this
> license will allow
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:58:56AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett P
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> > On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This is a slow and tedious Copy/Paste job, so expect some errors. I'm
> >> only doing it as I find time.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>> >
>> > On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> This is a slow and tedious Copy/Past
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> I wonder if we can do the following:
>
> - Tag all emails about release 4.0 with something like "[ASFCS40]". This is
> to allow developers to easily identify 4.0 chains and prioritize it.
+1 - I'll start doing that myself, as of today.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:35:22AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> > On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This is a slow and tedious Copy/Paste job, so expect some errors. I'm
> >> only doing it as I find time.
In continuation to the disucssion [1] to have publisher/subscriber event
notification mechanism in CloudStack I am proposing a framework for
delivering events to the in-process subscribers. This is slightly
in-contrast to the earlier discussion to have native rich notification
(callback, SMS, emai
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2012, at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
> wrote:
>
>> This is a slow and tedious Copy/Paste job, so expect some errors. I'm
>> only doing it as I find time. Hopefully one space a day will get us
>> fully migrated in a week.
>
> It i
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
