> -----Original Message----- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:17 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source > releases. > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 09/08/2012, at 3:01 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more > than happy to help :) > >>> > >>> - Brett > >> > >> How much help are you willing to provide? :) > >> I am not sure we have a lot of maven expertise around, but maybe > this > >> provides an even cleaner way to get rid of waf. > > > > > > As you'd note from my being behind responding to several threads, I > don't have a lot of bandwidth :) I can help get it started and provide > assistance, but someone else would need to be driving it - and as > others have noted, someone actively developing the project should > understand how it works going forward anyway. > > > > I wasn't thinking this was something you planned to do before the 4.0 > release. Is the thought that this might save some of the time on > release-related activities, or is it an incremental improvement to > consider beyond that? > > > > I think that folks are thinking after the initial release at this > point. At least I am.
I was thinking the opposite. Didn't this thread start because the current system isn't fit for purpose? I don't want 4.0 going out with a whole bunch of new complex dependencies, and have users unable to resolve them. That would be a backward step from what they have today. Ewan.
