On Dec 2, 4:52 pm, Peter Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I vote that we take Merlyn's code as a base and put it on SourceForge.
> I'll add my Lexer and Parser and work on formatting, parens matching and
> coloring. Erik can add his REPL and completion stuff.
&
group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Dec 7, 5:20 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 07.12.2008 um 09:55 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > This solution worked for me and you can see my patch at the following
> > url.
>
> >http://paste.lisp.org/display/71744
&
On Dec 3, 3:06 pm, levand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am coming to Clojure from the Java side, and am completely ignorant
> about lisp indentation & newline conventions.
>
> Some things are easy to pick up from posted examples and common
> sense...newline + tab af
On Dec 3, 3:06 pm, levand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am coming to Clojure from the Java side, and am completely ignorant
> about lisp indentation & newline conventions.
>
> Some things are easy to pick up from posted examples and common
> sense...newline + tab af
his message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
don't know it
(defmacro conj-when [pred new & coll]
`(let [test# ~pred]
(if test#
(conj [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~new)
[EMAIL PROTECTED])))
and an example ...
(defn- syncPacket [r]
(let [state (r :state)]
(conj-when (= state :W
On Dec 2, 2:39 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2 Dez., 04:47, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So why is the above form not legal in Clojure? I would think it might
> > come in handy to define
On Dec 2, 12:54 pm, Peter Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the code doesn't exist yet, I'd have to say no... Like I said,
> I'm just getting started.
>
> How about I get the basic framework going so that IntelliJ knows about
> CLJ files, and say paren
On Dec 1, 4:11 pm, Peter Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since I plan to introduce Clojure into existing large Java projects, I want
> to use a decent IDE. So I am writing a Clojure plugin for my favorite--
> IntelliJ. When I'm done I hope to offer a nice
il to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Nov 30, 10:16 am, Paul Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just watched Jim Weirich's talk from RubyConf. He does a good job
> of showing the basics of why concurrent programming is hard, and
> briefly talks about Erlang and Clojure at the end. I recommend it to
&g
On Nov 30, 7:47 pm, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any other solutions that would avoid a helper function? Not just
> > for my particular case, but anytime that one is
On Nov 30, 3:51 pm, "Michael Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 29, 7:52 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Nov 29, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Dani
On Nov 29, 7:52 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Daniel Renfer wrote:
>
> > Even if you don't think you'll run into the possibility of blowing
> > your stack, it's still a good idea to use recur when doing tail cal
On Nov 25, 11:07 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 25, 10:42 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 25, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > > I've added trampoline to ease the conversion
On Nov 25, 12:50 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 25, 12:22 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > This approach might just be too inefficient -- perhaps it would be
> > best to implemen
On Nov 25, 12:22 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This approach might just be too inefficient -- perhaps it would be
> best to implement the pretty-printer in an imperative style after all.
OTOH it is pretty darn nifty...
user> (pp
On Nov 24, 8:17 pm, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One option: You could use a seq instead of all the various structs.
I took your advice and uploaded the rewrite to the files section in
Google Groups, filename is pretty-printer.clj. It doesn't get a stack
overflow anymor
Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
On Nov 24, 3:03 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>
> Speculating about inefficiency without a concrete counter-proposal is
> not productive. While there could no doubt be some higher-performance
> vector constructor/reducers, producing vector-returning versions of
>
On Nov 24, 12:41 am, "Kevin Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you understand. clojure data structures are IMMUTABLE.
> every call to conj, or anyother function returns a "new" object. To
> optimize there is sharing of structure.
In the p
is message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Nov 23, 1:23 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still don't understand your expectation here. If the filter does any
> filtering, it won't return everything in the vector, so the new result
> will have fewer items. Do you want a vector with fewer items?
On Nov 21, 10:38 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> One thing that strikes me is that the (if (< num sample-size) ...)
> test is unnecessary after sample-size has been
> reached. It might be better to write it as two loops for that reason.
>
I wen
On Nov 22, 9:48 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> map and filter don't modify anything. What does it mean to filter a
> vector?
Yes yes, I know that. Still in English its sometimes easier to be
sloppy and pretend that I modify something even though I get another
vecto
On Nov 22, 7:31 pm, "Christian Vest Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> With (vec) I think:http://clojure.org/api#toc508
That's not really efficient as it copies the whole seq. It seems that
relative to sequences the other data structures are second class
insofar as w
from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Nov 21, 9:03 pm, Stuart Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> Although the reduce is very Lispy, in this case it might be clearer
> with loop/recur:
>
Thanks for your rewrite. I don't see if-let in the website API
documentation. I suppose I should track the
eems awfully short but it's a nice function to have, at least for
me.
Thanks,
Steve
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegr
eceived this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
oogle Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
you for your thoughts,
Benoit
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTE
raphic, so, any info would be appreciated.
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
On Nov 18, 1:20 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. I think this works for show-list-children:
>
> (defn insert-line [x y]
> (doc-concat x (doc-concat (doc-line) y)))
>
> (defn show-list-children [x]
>
On Nov 18, 1:12 pm, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Your implementation needs to get the whole value of pr-str before
> > deciding that it is too long to put on a si
On Nov 18, 12:53 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As always: don't copy code blindly! Take a step back and look from a
> distance, how you can *translate* the code. For example, in the
> show-list-children function, the recursion is just used for iteration
p"} :three
[1 2 3 4 5] :four "still making things up" :five :done})
#'user/things
user> (pp things)
nil
{:three [1 2 3 4 5],
:one "another",
:five :done,
:four "still making things up",
:two {:a "map", :map "inside"}}
user>
user>
On Nov 14, 3:42 pm, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Jeff Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does my dispatch function have to inspect the passed in values to
> > figure out which type of struct they are, or can I query that
> &
On Nov 14, 3:42 pm, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Jeff Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does my dispatch function have to inspect the passed in values to
> > figure out whichtypeof struct they are, or can I query that
> >
+1 for Baltimore.
On Oct 17, 8:12 am, Paul Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Baltimore, Maryland, US
>
> On Oct 17, 5:27 am, "Rastislav Kassak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello Clojurians,
>
> > I think after 1st year of Clojure life it&#
with me, Chouser.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options,
o this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
e you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
d email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
n my namespace. Is this a
bug?
Thank you,
Benoit
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gr
cified either as function metadata or by themselves,
using macro deftest.
Benoit
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.co
When I rebuilt using 1088 it works correctly. Thank you very much!
On Nov 9, 11:43 pm, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2008, at 9:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> svn co -r 1088
>
> If you continue to have trouble, ple
On Nov 10, 9:28 pm, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This works:
>
> svn cohttps://clojure.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/clojure/trunkclojure
> (checks out)
> cd clojure
> ant
> (builds)
> java -cp clojure.jar:./gen clojur
group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
ava:3740)
... 9 more
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
-Darren
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options,
On Nov 6, 12:43 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 5:23 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > To answer my own question - AFn.java implements java.util.Comparator.
>
> That is documented here:
>
> http://cl
On Nov 5, 5:53 pm, Matthias Benkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 3:33 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Are you sure? You're not modifying the clojure source, so you're not
> > creating a derivative work. I would think you can
To answer my own question - AFn.java implements java.util.Comparator.
On Nov 6, 10:18 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The doc of "sort" states that you need to implement
> java.util.Comparator in order to use custom sorting. Why then does
>
(sort my-comp [5 3 1 2])
(5 3 2 1)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [E
On Nov 5, 12:00 pm, Mibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why can't we debate whether a license is needed at all for a
> free project?
> (Too idealistic? Hey, it's a flame war. Just playing by the rules...)
This is sounding awfully trollish of you. I didn't start
On Nov 5, 6:55 am, Konrad Hinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. Can anyone cite a single lawsuit concerning an inappropriate
> mix of licenses?
Usually these license issues get resolved before court. The fact is
that it is illegal to combine CPL and GPL code in cer
On Nov 4, 4:37 pm, Matthias Benkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The CPL doesn't allow me to choose the GPL. Instead, it forces me to
> apply a CPL-compatible, GPL-like license -- a thing which may or may
> not currently exist, but which will certainly make my libr
ak.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http
On Nov 3, 12:36 pm, Matthias Benkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it's worth worrying about. The problem is, you're going to have
> the danger of fragmenting the Clojure user base.
I think Clojure has potential to become *very much* more well known
and used.
Are w
On Nov 2, 10:52 pm, "Mark H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 10:31 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (There are examples of projects 'weakening' the GPL in various ways
> > to suit their need
On Nov 3, 2:14 am, mritun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> What said problem would moving to GPL solve ? Shouldn't we hear
> atleast a couple of benefits that may be derived from moving to GPL ?
> Are there (GPL) projects that clojure would benefit from inc
On Nov 3, 5:35 am, J. Pablo Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing that might be doable and acceptable is dual licensing. If
> Clojure is realsed as CPL *and* GPL, it can be combined with GPL
> programs and it is not in any way more free than the CPL (say, like if
>
On Nov 3, 7:33 am, "Christian Vest Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MIT and BSD are not reciprocal licenses. I want a reciprocal license.
>
> What does it mean that a license is
On Nov 2, 5:11 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want a reciprocal license.
> But I don't want the license to apply to, or dictate anything about,
> non-derivative work that is combined with mine, as GPL does. I think
> doing so is fundamentally wrong.
It i
On Nov 2, 1:56 pm, ".Bill Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For an earlier discussion of this same topic,
> seehttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/735aa7f1c...
>
> Bill
I agree that GPL incompatibility isn't a concern for Clojure
On Nov 2, 3:28 pm, "a r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still, for me a dual CPL/LGPL license would be nicer. This is purely
> for practical reasons - Java itself going GPL, reusing (those few) GPL
> Java libraries or embeddingClojurecompiler in GPL applications (this
&g
On Nov 2, 1:16 pm, Matthias Benkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would hate to seeclojureadopting the GPL.
>
> Certainly, something compatible with the GPL wouldn't have to be the
> GPL itself.
Thank you. True!
cs
--~--~-~--~~~---~
On Nov 2, 11:06 am, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> many projects and businesses, both
> commercial and open-source, will categorically not use GPL-licensed
> software in their projects.
straw man again.They will use a GPL compatible license like MIT
and BSD
On Nov 2, 10:52 am, jdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. I personally dislike GPL
Opinions about the GPL are straw men. No one is advocating
conversion to GPLjust a GPL compatible license.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message becaus
I am not advocating Clojure move to the GPL!!! I don't want to fight
that battle.
However, a slight change to a GPL *compatible* license would be
*very* welcome
and I think benefit Clojure.
Chris
On Nov 2, 10:50 am, Phlex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
&
-compatible.html
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROT
correct.
I'm using emacs 22 on OSX.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
e you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Oct 29, 2:20 pm, Paul Drummond
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there reason why abs is not part of the Numbers interface?
I don't know, but...
> Would be nice to be able to use:
>
> (abs -1.0)
> 1
> (abs 1.0M)
> 1M
How about this:
(defn abs [x]
~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Oct 22, 6:45 pm, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't dismiss clojure/zip to easily. The functions defined there
> largely defer to functions stored in metadata on the object. This
> means a new type of zip tree can be provided by anyone in any
> namespace,
.?
Konrad.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
groups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Austin, Texas, USA.
On Oct 17, 9:18 am, "Eric Rochester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Atlanta, Georgia, US
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Rastislav Kassak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello Clojurians,
>
> > I think after
This lazy cached calculate is wonderful ,but i think the benefit from
it mostly due to cache .
On Oct 19, 11:56 pm, "Lauri Oherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is also a faster way to calculate fibonacci numbers in Clojure
> (code taken from
> fromhtt
Scala is sure to use java primitive int type underline, i.e value
type and boxed to java Integer when necessarily
But why not Clojure auto make this ?
gerry
On Oct 19, 11:31 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Here is coersion version for Cloju
int type?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http
86G，2G mem
Clojure and scala both latest build from svn
any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
Hubei，China
gerry
On Oct 17, 5:27 pm, "Rastislav Kassak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Clojurians,
>
> I think after 1st year of Clojure life it's good to check how far has
> Clojure spread all over the world.
>
> So wherever are you come from, be
m not sure I'll get back to it, if
it's any use please use what's there.
bd
On Oct 17, 3:59 am, "Iwan van der Kleijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am working on a Clojure plugin for jEdit. Currently you can use Clojure
> source as jEdit macros and evaluate s
Santiago, Chile.
On Oct 17, 6:27 am, "Rastislav Kassak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Clojurians,
>
> I think after 1st year of Clojure life it's good to check how far has
> Clojure spread all over the world.
>
> So wherever are you come from, be
Rich,thanks,
After i finish my translating work, I will contact you to see whether
it fit on your
web. But i hope so :)
Best regards
Gerry
On Oct 16, 6:55 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 1:05 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Oct 14, 10:04 am, Asbjørn Bjørnstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[..snip..]
> So it is not possible to put the clj files into the jar so that no
> unzipping
> is neccessary? I tried, but my java/jar knowledge is basically zero.
> --
> -asbjxrn
it is definitely
nsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
n the expression to inherit the binding values?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
ooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Sep 10, 4:32 pm, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The enclosed patch modifies "load" to detect and prevent loading a
> resource while another load of the same resource is pending in the
> same thread. It works at the "load&quo
On Sep 9, 4:26 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point is, having encountered this error (which is not the kind of
> thing that is going to lurk around to bite you deep at runtime), was
> it not obvious what the problem was? Did Clojure, and the work you
> were doi
On Sep 9, 11:26 am, "Brett Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For C, protection against circular dependencies is on the head of the
> programmer, in the form of #ifdef guards.
There is #import as a GCC extension (al
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
