RE: [Clamav-users] clamscan --mbox doesn't detect a virus

2004-01-05 Thread Diego d'Ambra
s: 0 > Scanned files: 1 > Infected files: 1 > Data scanned: 0.00 MB > I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes > Time: 30.744 sec (0 m 30 s) > > Please run freshclam and try again. > Please note that your clamscan only knows 9902 viruses (I guess it should be you how upgrade the DB).

[Clamav-users] Another sample that --mbox dosn't detect

2004-01-06 Thread Diego d'Ambra
vd is up to date (version: 72, sigs: 146, f-level: 1, builder: ddm) Any DB maintainers that want to take a look at the original this is submission 412. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] paypal trojan

2004-01-15 Thread Diego d'Ambra
virus: Worm.Mimail.J The virus Mimail.P looks and behaves almost as Worm.Mimail.J. When we received the first copy of Worm.Mimail.P, we actually named it Worm.Mimail.J thinking it was some sort of variant. Later when other av-scanners started to detect it the name for this variant was changed to Worm.M

RE: [Clamav-users] MyDoom???

2004-02-04 Thread Diego d'Ambra
.Mydoom.a Dr. Web - 27.01. 03:40 - Win32.HLLM.Foo.32768 Panda (BETA) - 27.01. 04:10 - W32/Mydoom.A.worm McAfee - 27.01. 05:00 - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quickheal - 27.01. 05:00 - W32.Novarg Bitdefender - 27.01. 05:00 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Panda - 27.01. 05:10 - W32/Mydoom.A.worm Ikarus - 27.01.

RE: [Clamav-users] MyDoom.D - manual signature generation?

2004-02-11 Thread Diego d'Ambra
a > signing server, since I presumably don't have access to one? > You don't need to sign your DB (and convert it to CVD). Just drop your .db file in the directory where you normally store the CVD files and reload clamd if used. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] Submission to virusbtn.com and AV-test.org?

2004-02-24 Thread Diego d'Ambra
e already in contact with Andreas Marx from AV-Test.org. They're tracking ClamAVs response time, but currently I'm not allowed to publish their results :-( You can read their first test result at http://www.pcwelt.de/news/viren_bugs/37827/2.html (or http://www.av-test.org). Bes

RE: [Clamav-users] password protected zip file

2004-03-02 Thread Diego d'Ambra
le-F or Bagle-H zip attachment (Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd). So you should allow ClamAV also to scan the e-mail. BTW: I'm currently working on adding a second signature that will detect a variant of these e-mails. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] password-protected Worm.Bagle.H

2004-03-02 Thread Diego d'Ambra
really easy ways for the virus writer to > circumvent this type of check but until they start utilizing such > strategies, is it possible to include the zip's crc into ClamAV's sigs? > >From the (unzipped) samples I've access to they differ in size, so MD5 or other

[Clamav-users] Wanted

2004-03-02 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Hello Community, We suspect that ClamAV is missing a signature against Welchia.B (Nachi.B). If someone has a sample please submit it through http://clamav.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/sendvirus.cgi Thanks in advance... Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptogr

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.F

2004-03-02 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ttp://clamav.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/sendvirus.cgi Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] Password-protected .zip file viruses

2004-03-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
crack, so it is doable (although it takes time)... > Since you know what the extracted content would be, you should be able to "cut some BIG corners" instead of a full brute-force-crack. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-5..

2004-03-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
e.F-zippwd-x detects e-mails infected with password protected zip files and it also detects some of the later variants. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-5..

2004-03-04 Thread Diego d'Ambra
be doing wrong, or are you simply using the msg text > contents? > The signature matches text found in the body of the e-mail and the first and last part of the zip attachment (so you can say it's a combination). Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] ArchiveDetectEncrypted and --detect-encrypted

2004-03-04 Thread Diego d'Ambra
2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > > Also I think, the real ClamAV hero is Diego d'Ambra who spent the whole > > day yesterday providing an instant protection against the latest > > threats. > > Indeed. Diego, thank you very much. > You're welcome :-) I don'

RE: [Clamav-users] why don't detect

2004-03-17 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ble to tell why the --mbox option didn't detect the virus. Your sample has been forwarded to Nigel, so I expect he will have more details. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] why don't detect

2004-03-18 Thread Diego d'Ambra
x27;t detected with the --mbox option I suggest that you contact Nigel and let him have a look at them. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] attachment-free worms

2004-03-18 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ou should go after: ---snip--- http://IP_ADDR:81/NUMBERS.php";> ---snip--- IP_ADDR = an IP address NUMBERS = variable length of numbers from 0-9 Line breaks = CR/LF (hex: 0xOD 0x0A) And there will probably also be some HTML tags around this. Last resort would be to prevent users a

RE: [Clamav-users] Adding a "FakesSender" tag?

2004-03-24 Thread Diego d'Ambra
up with the idea for a general tag added to the clamav > virus names for viruses that fake the sender? > Actually we agreed on adding @smm (Spoofed Mass Mailer) to virus names, but unfortunately we haven't started to use it (yet). Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] Virus Names

2004-04-06 Thread Diego d'Ambra
netsky is Worm.SomeFool, then why is it not labeled as Worm.SomeFool? > > But when something is this much of a phenomenon, why not just change the > name? I know it's been done for other worms in the past. > And that is what we'll (try to) do in the future (if a comm

RE: [Clamav-users] Virus Names

2004-04-06 Thread Diego d'Ambra
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Bonivart > Sent: 6. april 2004 22:12 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Virus Names > > Diego d'Ambra wrote: > > And that is w

RE: [Clamav-users] new virus (?): "automatically scanned for viruses using xxx"

2004-04-15 Thread Diego d'Ambra
the naming of new viruses. ClamAV calls this family Nyxem (the name used by Kaspersky). Signature added through daily.cvd version 264 (ref. update announcement for further details). Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] Does the Sasser signature catch all variants?

2004-05-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
this is not the case... But if you (or anyone else) has a sample please submit them (for variant B, C & D). Thanks in advance. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] How to submit email from Exchange Server?

2004-05-04 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ot;copy to clipboard" function then paste the text to a Notepad file. (otherwise you're welcome to submit this .msg sample directly to me). Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] There is something I dont get here ...

2004-05-06 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ever recognize those ? > Do I need to write a program to fix headers and/or parse the mbox files > myself > before passing them to clam ? > There are many ways to do this - using the --mbox option should detect the virus if the _full_ e-mail is scanned by ClamAV. Otherwise I sugg

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: There is something I dont get here ...

2004-05-06 Thread Diego d'Ambra
files: 1 Data scanned: 0.02 MB I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes Time: 1.358 sec (0 m 1 s) ---snip--- > > Honest: I am convinced we face a bug here. > I'm not, but you're welcome to submit the _full_ e-mail (I suspect the sample I'm looking at is only a partial bounced sample) :-) Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] Sober.G failing to be detected after 349 update

2004-06-10 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ly" 566 copies (I live in UTC +0200) - used to be around 100K per day. I can confirm that ClamAV still contains signature matching Sober-G. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: False positive or problem with zipped exe

2004-08-18 Thread Diego d'Ambra
obody can answer unless you submit the file. > > > > http://clamav.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/sendvirus.cgi > > > > The page didn't work : my browser says "Document contains no data" > The other problem is that file size is 2M > You're welcome

RE: [Clamav-users] New virus undetected by clamav?

2004-10-29 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ly variants (and dropped files). Daily 560 contained Worm.Bagle.AT Daily 561 contained Worm.Bagle.AX (will be renamed to Worm.Balge.AU). Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV and Exchange mailboxes...

2004-11-09 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ed on a file system (M drive on Exchange 2K, must be enabled on Exchange 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/?id=821836). The downside is that the message would be delivered to the mailbox before you get a chance to scan it, so the right way to do this is through VSAPI. Best regards, Diego d'

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV should not try to detect phishing and othersocial engineering attacks

2004-11-15 Thread Diego d'Ambra
want it to detect, but I believe that categorizing samples beyond what ClamAV offers today is too time consuming. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

RE: [Clamav-users] how to submit a virus

2004-11-26 Thread Diego d'Ambra
w message (download from http://www.olspamcop.org). This utility is normally used to extract emails for spam reporting, but can similar be used with virus samples. Use the copy function and paste the content to example notepad or other text editor - then submit the saved file to ClamAV.

Re: [Clamav-users] Bagle-BB.rar

2005-04-14 Thread Diego d'Ambra
was online (at least none of the onces I tried). Thanks in advance... Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] virus questions

2005-04-30 Thread Diego d'Ambra
call it or simply by observing the behavior (with example ethereal). Please note that IRC malware isn't virus, but often used to "remote control" the infected machine. See http://www.clamav.net/cvdinfo.html Best regards, Diego d'Ambra

RE: [clamav-users] FortNight virus

2003-06-05 Thread Diego d'Ambra
There are many versions of FortNight (IFrame exploits). The one you mention is version JS.FortNight.E - this was added to the signature database yesterday (04-june-2003 20:45). Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: Fajar Arief Nugraha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Se

RE: [clamav-users] FortNight virus

2003-06-05 Thread Diego d'Ambra
eight=3D0> If you already reported this, I'm it will be added. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: Fajar Arief Nugraha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5. juni 2003 11:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [clamav-users] FortNight virus I sent it to [EMAIL PR

RE: [clamav-users] Re: Screensaver (fwd)

2003-06-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
You must be doing something wrong. The viruses.db of june 2nd contains signature for "Worm.Sobig.C". Info about your setup is needed, if more help is required. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: Ed Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. jun

RE: [clamav-users] FortNight virus

2003-06-05 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Could you drop me a mail sample - I will then take a look at it. Please upload the sample to a web-site to prevent other scanners from stopping your mail. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -Original Message- From: Fajar Arief Nugraha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5.

RE: [clamav-users] clamav install

2003-06-10 Thread Diego d'Ambra
implement this. If this seems too difficult, I suggest you go with clamdscan.   Best regards, Diego d'Ambra           -Original Message- From: Daniel Arjona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10. juni 2003 22:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [clamav-users] clamav install   Hi,

RE: [clamav-users] Which is the latest snapshop?

2003-06-10 Thread Diego d'Ambra
I didn't even know that you could download Clam there. Try this instead http://clamav.elektrapro.com Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10. juni 2003 23:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [clamav-users] Wh

RE: [clamav-users] Sobig.b

2003-06-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Yes, Clam detects Palyh (Sobig.b) and have been doing so aprox 24 hours after outbreak. It also detects the latest version of Sobig now called Sobig.C. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: Ed Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. juni 2003 02:41 To: [

[clamav-users] Is the virus DB synchronized?

2003-06-11 Thread Diego d'Ambra
not intentionally - the test was repeated after 30 minutes. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [clamav-users] mirrors.txt

2003-06-10 Thread Diego d'Ambra
You will find it in the same dir as the virus database (/usr/local/share/clamav/) Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: Ed Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10. juni 2003 18:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [clamav-users] mirrors.txt Where does mirrors.txt

RE: [clamav-users] FortNight virus

2003-06-05 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Hmm, here Clam has detected several JS.FortNight.E, the mentioned IFRAME tag looks same as mine. Are you sure you let Clam have "a go" on the e-mail? JS.FortNight.E is not an attachment, just an IFRAME HTML tag. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: Faja

RE: [clamav-users] checksum failure again?

2003-07-01 Thread Diego d'Ambra
It seems that you tried to download new db while I was uploading new database. Just run fresclam again. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: Brian Read [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 1. juli 2003 13:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [clamav-users] checksum fa

RE: [clamav-users] CAN DETECT THIS VIRUS???

2003-07-14 Thread Diego d'Ambra
I've not tested this yet... Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: Thomas Lamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14. juli 2003 10:26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [clamav-users] CAN DETECT THIS VIRUS??? Antony Stone wrote: > On Monday 14 July 2003 8:44 am, Jord

RE: [Clamav-users] signature W95/Elkern

2003-08-14 Thread Diego d'Ambra
egistry). This looks like a false positive. If someone has a copy of the real Elkern virus new signature could be created. This mail covers submission 197. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14. august 2003 15:45

[Clamav-users] Error when scanning plain-mail files

2003-08-14 Thread Diego d'Ambra
L PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 Subject: Batabo, Family sex alboum collection MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--EE1672F1842553B" X-SoftScan-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- end, sample from virus.eml ---

RE: [Clamav-users] Configuring mail notifications?

2003-08-20 Thread Diego d'Ambra
The log you're showing is from qmail-scanner with the debug option set. Qmail-scanner supports "silent" notifications if the virus is known to spoof the sender address. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -Original Message- From: Ted Fines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2

RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Sobig.F@mm Undetected by current signature

2003-08-26 Thread Diego d'Ambra
my opinion - I'll have no problem in creating a signature that stops a large part of the damaged Sobig.F. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26. august 2003 05:13 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] &

RE: [Clamav-users] Proxy and Scanning?

2003-08-27 Thread Diego d'Ambra
> -Original Message- > From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27. august 2003 01:21 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Proxy and Scanning? > > > Is it possible to scan the traffic (via plug in or so) with > SQUID or an SOCKS-Proxy (like Dante)? If not: Feature Reque

RE: [Clamav-users] a few damaged viri still making it through...

2003-09-02 Thread Diego d'Ambra
/cgi-bin/sendvirus.cgi - don't worry about extracting the attachment. It will then be reviewed by the signature maintainers. Once the DB is updated you can read what happened with your submission. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra --- Thi

RE: [Clamav-users] RE: UPDATE81.exe getting thru

2003-09-19 Thread Diego d'Ambra
r a virus scanner that is "stripping" the offending part in an infected e-mail passing through it. Since the binary is completely missing it's difficult to create a signature that will catch the "damaged" versions of Gibe.F. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra

RE: [Clamav-users] RE: UPDATE81.exe getting thru

2003-09-20 Thread Diego d'Ambra
gt; -- > Noel Jones > A signature that detects damaged e-mails containing only a part of the Worm.Gibe.F has now been added to the DB. The signature is matching a part of the text and multiple parts of the images imbedded in e-mails sent by Gibe.F. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra -

RE: [Clamav-users] RE: UPDATE81.exe getting thru

2003-09-20 Thread Diego d'Ambra
the case of Gibe.F it was necessary to collect enough samples to understand what was common between them. Because it is uncertain if the person behind Gibe.F copied the embedded images from Microsoft, it wasn't an option only to use these. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra --

RE: [Clamav-users] squid and clamav

2003-10-08 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ce Squid alone isn't enough. There might be other solutions that are better, but I'ven't tried them - example DansGuardian (http://www.pcxperience.org/dgvirus) Please note that scanning a proxy session is quite different that scanning an e-mail. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra

RE: [Clamav-users] false virus

2003-10-20 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ote: > >> Report: ClamAV: 21c6fdc8.su2 contains Exploit.IFrame.Gen > > clamav.net -> database link > > my virus scanner did not save virus :/, should i try to make a redo ? > It would be very useful to have a sample of

RE: [Clamav-users] false positives

2003-10-22 Thread Diego d'Ambra
e DB files you don't like ClamAV to detect. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lists > Sent: 22. oktober 2003 09:52 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-user

RE: [Clamav-users] viruses that forge from: and/or envelope sender addresses

2003-10-22 Thread Diego d'Ambra
x27;yaha','b raid','nimda','tanatos','sobig','winevar','IFRMEXP','ganda','fizzer ','palyh','trojan.win32.dia','dumaru','gibe','swen'); Once your server find a virus run

RE: [Clamav-users] production issues?

2003-10-29 Thread Diego d'Ambra
at http://clamav.sourceforge.net/doc/clamd_supervised/clamd-daemontools-gui de.txt This will allow you to "monitor" the clamd daemon and restart it if it hangs. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Gi

RE: [Clamav-users] Clean Viruses?

2003-11-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
out of this would be you. I'm unaware of the effort needed to develop a cleaning option, but I'm sure that a batch of virus samples isn't the way to ask for this. > Old school virus-coding rocks couse the old "school boys" (which codes for > C64, Apple2 and so o

RE: [Clamav-users] Exploit.IFrame.Gen - description ?

2003-11-27 Thread Diego d'Ambra
rame.Gen (Clam)=696672616d65207372633d*6369643a*6865696768743d*2077696474683d*2f696672616d65*2f424f44593e3c2f48544d4c3e 696672616d65207372633d [EMAIL PROTECTED] src= 6369643a cid: 6865696768743d height= 2077696474683d width= 2f696672616d65 /[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2f424f44593e3c2f48544d4c3e /BODY><-HTML>   B

Re: [Clamav-users] Sober.P

2005-05-16 Thread Diego d'Ambra
d machines, not replicating itself, but waiting for an update. The Sober-Q varianter was downloaded this way and it's currently responsible for a serie of "rightwing propaganda" spam messages. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ h

Re: [Clamav-users] How does ClamAV classify Worm and Trojan ?

2005-06-10 Thread Diego d'Ambra
gards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] odd problem w/clamd

2005-06-11 Thread Diego d'Ambra
onnections) - Ensure you've access to a fast DNS server (if spamd is doing RBL checks) - Use badmailfrom/badmailto - it may help you filter unneeded smtp connections (Optionally renice the qmail-send/qmail-remote user to ensure that email queued for remote delivery gets enough cpu) Be

Re: [Clamav-users] disable

2005-07-06 Thread Diego d'Ambra
mav configuration - check that clamd is running as the user advised by qmail-scanner. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] disable

2005-07-06 Thread Diego d'Ambra
don't know the details of qmail, but you need a user either the same as the qmail scanner, or in the same group if you add "allowsupplementarygroups" in clamd.conf That problem is due to spamd (not clamd) - but yes it's advised to run spamd as an user different than root.

Re: [Clamav-users] virus Mytob.bi

2005-07-12 Thread Diego d'Ambra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have submit this file to clamav research two times, but is yet not included. I've looked through our submissions and I can't find any from you. If possible could you inform submission number or email address used when you submitted samples. Best rega

Re: [Clamav-users] virus Mytob.bi

2005-07-12 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ld be available with . Thanks for the heads up... Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by -devel version; 0.86-1 ok

2005-07-21 Thread Diego d'Ambra
re Worm.Mytob.FJ was updated in daily 985 (due to fp) - are you sure that your samples are detected by 0.86.1/985? Could you mail me a sample (in a password protected zip archive) that isn't detected by current CVS? TIA. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra __

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus not detected by -devel version; 0.86-1 ok

2005-07-21 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Diego d'Ambra wrote: Steve Brown wrote: I've noticed that today's (maybe also recent versions) development version of clam no longer detects W32/Mytob-BP (Sophos). I have several samples which are declared fine by ClamAV (devel-20050721/985/Thu Jul 21 13:14:39 2005), but corre

Re: [Clamav-users] Wrong version info in header after upgrade

2005-07-26 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Steven Spence wrote: Or you can just edit /var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt with the correct version. I am not quite sure why qmail-scanner just doesn't pull the version from the clamd binary instead of a text file. Performance? Best regards, Diego d&

Re: [Clamav-users] Wrong version info in header after upgrade

2005-07-26 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Steven Spence wrote: Diego d'Ambra wrote: Steven Spence wrote: Or you can just edit /var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt with the correct version. I am not quite sure why qmail-scanner just doesn't pull the version from the clamd binary instead of a

Re: [Clamav-users] Zotob - same as Worm.Mytob.CL?

2005-08-16 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ive either way... Zotob-A, see http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20050814.215255.66cd6ac2.en.html Zotob-B is detected as . I've not studied Zotob-C, so I can't say if or maybe what this variant is detected as. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___

Re: [Clamav-users] Scanning encrypted files in a mail

2005-08-25 Thread Diego d'Ambra
protected malware archive (zip or rar) instead of the content inside it. Searching for signatures that has "pwd" as a part of their name, gives you an impression of the kind of malware that uses this technique. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra _

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav oddity w.r.t Worm.Bagle.Gen-3?

2005-09-21 Thread Diego d'Ambra
ld be able to verify this by comparing db update notifications and your installation time). Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] mytob.gh = morphine-packed binaries and bagle.bb-gen = pex-packed binaries?

2005-09-21 Thread Diego d'Ambra
m - had it been "useful" binaries I would gladly have added them :-) BTW: You may encounter same problem with other av-scanners. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Detecting malicious WMF files

2006-01-02 Thread Diego d'Ambra
't cover every possible variant. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Detecting malicious WMF files

2006-01-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
. Currently ClamAV has received 93 malware variants, all detected as Exploit.WMF.A or Exploit.WMF.Gen-3. For those who wish to test their ClamAV installation see: http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?rss&storyid=1006 Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___

Re: [Clamav-users] Detecting malicious WMF files

2006-01-04 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Filbert wrote: On Tuesday 03 January 2006 10:39, Diego d'Ambra wrote: Abdul Rehman Gani wrote: Hi, Clamscan currently detects Exploit.WMF.A, but F-Secure are reporting 57 different varieties. How many does this signature detect? Just an update: I believe that with daily.cvd version

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9

2006-01-08 Thread Diego d'Ambra
like SpamGrabber to do it (http:/spamgrabber.org). Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] No response to virus submissions...

2006-01-25 Thread Diego d'Ambra
. Could you explain what you're matching, thanks. Sorry, the signature I posted above is for undetected Feebs variants. I got my viruses mixed up. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] No response to virus submissions...

2006-01-25 Thread Diego d'Ambra
rge number of Feebs-C variants isn't detected by that signature, sorry. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] No response to virus submissions...

2006-01-26 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Erik Corry wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:55:10PM +0100, Diego d'Ambra wrote: > Erik Corry wrote: > > > >Suspicious.HTML.javascript2=756e6573636170652822253636 > > > >Put it in a file called local.db in the same directory as your main.cvd > >and

Re: [Clamav-users] No response to virus submissions...

2006-01-26 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Erik Corry wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:24:57AM +0100, Diego d'Ambra wrote: > Erik Corry wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:55:10PM +0100, Diego d'Ambra wrote: > > > Erik Corry wrote: > > > > > > > >Suspicious.HTML.javascript2=756

Re: [Clamav-users] No response to virus submissions...

2006-01-26 Thread Diego d'Ambra
d >) would make it more FP safe. Works for all variants that I have seen, but also catches any html file with unescape ("func without the space. Right now I think I can live with that. Does the * wildcard have a limit to how many characters it will look ahead? N

Re: [Clamav-users] No response to virus submissions...

2006-01-26 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Erik Corry wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:09:28PM +0100, Diego d'Ambra wrote: > Erik Corry wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:50:00AM +0100, Erik Corry wrote: > > > > > > How about: > > > > > > > >JS.Feebs-C.variant-ec:

Re: [Clamav-users] Is CME officially supported/supporting ClamAV?

2006-02-01 Thread Diego d'Ambra
rrect. Is there no interest in supporting this, or am I just blind? (the latter is quite possible ;-) I don't know if ClamAV meets "membership" requirements, since AFAIK nobody from ClamAV has been contacted or tried to contact CME (yet). Best regards, Diego d'Ambra

Re: [Clamav-users] Zafi worm misidentified as Trojan.Downloader.Small-1004

2006-02-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
unrelated malware. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Zafi worm misidentified as Trojan.Downloader.Small-1004

2006-02-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
Christopher X. Candreva wrote: On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Diego d'Ambra wrote: I'm investigating this. I believe that signature small-1004 is matching some sort of PE packer/obfuscater and must be updated to avoid detecting unrelated malware. Personally, I'm not as interested in nam

Re: [Clamav-users] Latest MS Word zero-day exploit

2006-12-08 Thread Diego d'Ambra
possible yet, since information about the vulnerability hasn't been disseminated. Reference: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-5994 http://secunia.com/advisories/23232/ Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ Help us build a comprehe

Re: [Clamav-users] Latest MS Word zero-day exploit

2006-12-17 Thread Diego d'Ambra
John Wilcock wrote: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/929433.mspx It's not clear from MS or news sources whether any exploits are actively spreading... Does ClamAV have any signatures yet? Signature Exploit.MSWord.CVE_2006_6561 added with daily 2352. Best regards,

Re: [Clamav-users] Possible false positives?

2006-12-20 Thread Diego d'Ambra
with the signature added in daily 2352 http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20061217.202336.754898f1.en.html Please send the samples in a password protected zip archive. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Diego d'Ambra ___ Help us build a comprehens