Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:46:28 -0700
> Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps the solution is to report only true failures and not intermediate
>> failures
>> while on the path to success.
>
> the latest version of freshclam with --no-warnings should do it
>
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:46:28 -0700
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps the solution is to report only true failures and not intermediate
> failures
> while on the path to success.
the latest version of freshclam with --no-warnings should do it
--
oo. Tomasz
G.W. Haywood wrote:
>
> But it seems to me that there's hardly a week goes by without someone
> posting to the list a new and interesting way in which his freshclam-
> driven update has failed.
>
> Take today, for example.
I haven't have a freshclam failure yet but I've had errors reported.
Fr
Hi there,
> > > "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync
> > > > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all this messing
> > > > about with HTTP?
> > >
> > > The atomic-rsync would have to be used instead of fre
> > > "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync
> > > > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all this messing
> > > > about with HTTP?
On 01.07.08 14:19, Henrik K wrote:
> What's wrong with HTTP? It's very scalable and
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:09:08PM +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> > "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync
> > > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all th
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:09:08 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> > "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync
> > > instead of (or at least as an a
Hi there,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync
> > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all this messing
> > about with HTTP?
>
> The atomic-rsync would have to be used ins
On Monday 30 June 2008 4:02 am, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:45:42 -0500
>
> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is run at 23:59 nightly, so sometime between Sunday at the time it
> > was ran and yesterday when it ran 80454 signatures were dropped from the
> > database. I did n
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:05:14 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> > When we update the main database and move sigs from daily.cvd into
> > it at some point both main.cvd and daily.cvd include the same
> > (duplicated) su
Hi there,
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> When we update the main database and move sigs from daily.cvd into
> it at some point both main.cvd and daily.cvd include the same
> (duplicated) subset of signatures. The counter drops down with a new
> release of daily.cvd
That's ugly.
While
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:45:42 -0500
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is run at 23:59 nightly, so sometime between Sunday at the time it was
> ran and yesterday when it ran 80454 signatures were dropped from the
> database. I did notice this in my clamav log:
>
> Mon Jun 23 15:11:20 2008 -
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 10:20 am, Hameedullah Khan wrote:
> Clamav known virus count has been dropped from: 495155 to 325548.
>
> I tried to find it on google but dind't found anything. A fellow
> sysadmin pointed to me at:
> http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20080417.120720.723a5e47.en.html
> which
Clamav known virus count has been dropped from: 495155 to 325548.
I tried to find it on google but dind't found anything. A fellow
sysadmin pointed to me at:
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20080417.120720.723a5e47.en.html
which says that clamav must be loading some table twice.
So now my questi
14 matches
Mail list logo
