On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:09:08PM +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > > "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync > > > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all this messing > > > about with HTTP? > > > > The atomic-rsync would have to be used instead of freshclam on all > > 2M+ clients and this is not an option. > > Why would all clients be required to use the same method?
What's wrong with HTTP? It's very scalable and works everywhere. I have no idea how many concurrent connections can rsync daemon easily support, but I'm sure it much more heavier than sending ready patches through HTTP. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
