Hi there, > > > "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync > > > > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all this messing > > > > about with HTTP? > > > > > > The atomic-rsync would have to be used instead of freshclam on all > > > 2M+ clients and this is not an option. > > > > Why would all clients be required to use the same method? > > Because otherwise we would still have to use the same update > scenario as currently.
Obviously it would be necessary to use both, at least for some time. But it seems to me that there's hardly a week goes by without someone posting to the list a new and interesting way in which his freshclam- driven update has failed. Take today, for example. -- 73, Ged. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
