On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:09:08 +0100 (BST) "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there, > > On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > > "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync > > > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all this messing > > > about with HTTP? > > > > The atomic-rsync would have to be used instead of freshclam on all > > 2M+ clients and this is not an option. > > Why would all clients be required to use the same method? Because otherwise we would still have to use the same update scenario as currently. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Tue Jul 1 13:11:45 CEST 2008 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
