> > > "G.W. Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ... is there any reason not to use something like atomic-rsync > > > > instead of (or at least as an alternative to) all this messing > > > > about with HTTP?
On 01.07.08 14:19, Henrik K wrote: > What's wrong with HTTP? It's very scalable and works everywhere. > > I have no idea how many concurrent connections can rsync daemon easily > support, but I'm sure it much more heavier than sending ready patches > through HTTP. ... and supports proxying -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 2B|!2B, that's a question! _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
