Hello,
2017-11-29 16:29 GMT+01:00 Heitor Faria :
> > Hello
>
> Hello, Gokan,
>
> > I get an error like below. The problem says it's a bootstrap.
> > How can I overcome this?
>
> Most likely you are using the run command to perform a restore. This is
> wrong and you don't need to create a Restore
> Most likely you are using the run command to perform a restore. This is wrong
> and you don't need to create a Restore Job for each backup client you have.
> You are supposed to use the restore command.
> Perhaps, Jobs with the Restore Type should not appear in the run list at all
> (feature re
> Hello
Hello, Gokan,
> I get an error like below. The problem says it's a bootstrap.
> How can I overcome this?
Most likely you are using the run command to perform a restore. This is wrong
and you don't need to create a Restore Job for each backup client you have.
You are supposed to use the
Remove the line:
Write Bootstrap = "/var/lib/bacula/%c.bsr"
Patti
On 11/29/17, 5:53 AM, "Gokan Atmaca" wrote:
Hello
I get an error like below. The problem says it's a bootstrap.
How can I overcome this?
29-Nov 13:36 bacula0-dir JobId 64: Error: Bacula bacula0-d
Hello
I get an error like below. The problem says it's a bootstrap.
How can I overcome this?
29-Nov 13:36 bacula0-dir JobId 64: Error: Bacula bacula0-dir 7.4.4 (202Sep16):
Build OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu debian 9.0
JobId: 64
Job:Windows01Rest
Hello Phil,
I have not yet figured out what is going wrong here, or what triggered
Bacula to think it is trying to use a Volume directly from the Scratch
pool. I am going to look at the code in more detail to see if I can
find the problem. In any case, I am planning to remove the code as in
On 01/15/17 16:34, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> It is a bit late here so I will look at all your output tomorrow, but if
> you have the patience, go to:
>
> /src/dird/ua_run.c
> then at line 1074, you should have the following lines of code:
>
> /* Not a good idea to start a job wi
Hello Phil,
It is a bit late here so I will look at all your output tomorrow, but if
you have the patience, go to:
/src/dird/ua_run.c
then at line 1074, you should have the following lines of code:
/* Not a good idea to start a job with the Scratch pool */
if (rc.pool && strcmp(rc.pool-
Removed Storage from the Scratch pool definition.
Updated the Scratch pool from resource.
Re-updated director from 7.4.3 to 7.4.4
Re-entered the restore job. Job failed with the same
invalid-scratch-pool message.
cwd is: /
$ cd /home/alaric
cwd is: /home/alaric/
$ cd ".moonchild productions"
cw
On 01/15/17 02:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Sorry, I did not explain the problem clearly enough. For some reason (I
> hope to find out Monday), doing backups directly to a Scratch pool (i.e.
> the Scratch pool is directly referenced in the Job) do or can lead to
> problems.
Yeah, I can see that b
Hello Phil,
Please see below ...
On 01/15/2017 03:25 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/14/17 16:36, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello Phil,
>>
>> Someone apparently someone submitted the following comment to a bug report:
>>
>>
>> Currently, a scratch pool is uses as any other pool. In particula
On 01/14/17 16:36, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> Someone apparently someone submitted the following comment to a bug report:
>
>
> Currently, a scratch pool is uses as any other pool. In particula, it is
> possible to use a scratch pool as a target for backups. The result may
> be
Hello Phil,
Someone apparently someone submitted the following comment to a bug report:
Currently, a scratch pool is uses as any other pool. In particula, it is
possible to use a scratch pool as a target for backups. The result may
be quite unexpected and annoying.
One solution would be t
On 01/14/17 13:49, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/14/17 13:19, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Does anyone have the slightest idea what's going on here, or why Bacula
>> suddenly cares about the scratch pool which it isn't even using for this
>> job, but is perfectly happy to recycle expired disk volumes
On 01/14/17 13:19, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Does anyone have the slightest idea what's going on here, or why Bacula
> suddenly cares about the scratch pool which it isn't even using for this
> job, but is perfectly happy to recycle expired disk volumes into?
Oh, and it's also perfectly happy to de
I have a problem. I need to restore a single directory of files. I
have the required tape volume mounted, I set up the job, no problem,
until I exit file selection.
Then suddenly, bacula (7.4.4) tells me:
1,179 files selected to be restored.
Pool "Scratch" not valid.
Job not run.
*
...Wait,
I'm trying to do a restore of a directory of files. The restore gets a
few files from one volume (disk volumes), but then stops with the
director shows the job waiting on the client to connect to the storage
daemon.
I traced the problem down to the director telling the client to connect
to the wr
If you want to use FQDN's in Bacula and do not want to touch your DNS servers
you could modify /etc/hosts (assuming you are on a *nix box) to do the job for
you.
The only gotcha is the remote host changes identity (repurposed, whatever)
I use /etc/hosts to avoid DNS look ups, changes are immedi
2012/12/7 Silas Moeckel
> try just 2 a records now views.
>
>
But with 2 A records, sometimes the dns would resolve to 192.168.0.254 and
others to 192.168.1.254. right?
I used views because the "dmz" lan only have direct access to "192.168.0.254"
and the DNS would always resolv to 192.168.0.254
> So only one real storage device? Try assigning a single dns name and
> using that most modern resolvers when presented with more than one A record
> will use one on a shared subnet before others.
>
>
Yeah, I've tried that before, using views... But that created such a mess
on my DNS server (spe
On 12/7/2012 11:56 AM, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
Hello list.
I have several Storages configured but all of them are pointing to the
same Device, they differ only by their Address. It's something like this:
Storage {
Name = st.servers
Address = 192.168.1.254
Password = "XXX"
D
Hello list.
I have several Storages configured but all of them are pointing to the same
Device, they differ only by their Address. It's something like this:
Storage {
Name = st.servers
Address = 192.168.1.254
Password = "XXX"
Device = dev.tpc
Media Type = LTO4
Autochanger
>> Has anyone else seen this behaviour?
>
> Any resolution?
>
Not yet
--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
opti
On 11/18/2010 9:09 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
>
> I have one particular restore which only brings back ~11,500 files out
> of 980,000 on a full backup.
>
> Using Bextract and attempting to restore the job that way gives the same
> result.
>
> There are no errors except that the job was expecting a lot m
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:09:51 +, Alan Brown said:
>
> I have one particular restore which only brings back ~11,500 files out
> of 980,000 on a full backup.
>
> Using Bextract and attempting to restore the job that way gives the same
> result.
>
> There are no errors except that the jo
I have one particular restore which only brings back ~11,500 files out
of 980,000 on a full backup.
Using Bextract and attempting to restore the job that way gives the same
result.
There are no errors except that the job was expecting a lot more files
than actually came back.
The odd thing i
Hi Arnaud, can I ask you how did you launch the restore.
(I never use bootstrap file, always a restore from bconsole)
If you can just explain how you run the restore.
With what I've seen on the log and your bsr file.
You have 2 differents volumes. Perharps the one mounted is not the one seeked
du
Hello,
Using bacula in a french education distribution based on ubuntu 8.04, I
have a problem during restore.
Here is my bacula.log file...
Could you help me?
Should this error caused by a hardware problem?
Arnaud
13-jan 17:27 127.0.0.1-dir JobId 3: Démarrage du Job de restauration
RestoreLD
My problem is that I'm always using packages from Debian repositories, and
my servers always have the latest stable release from Debian, for this
reason I'm always using the same version of Bacula in Director and Storage
Daemon,and I never have any problem. But with Bacula 3 I can do diferencial
an
i am using bacula since version 1.36 and
i have never seen a release note without :
> Compatibility:
> As always, both the Director and Storage daemon must be upgraded at
> the same time.
:)
Francisco Garcia Perez schrieb:
> :´(, thank you very much for your response, now I have the same vers
:´(, thank you very much for your response, now I have the same version on
Director and Storage Daemon and all works fine.
2009/11/10 Chris Shelton
> Francisco,
>
> 2009/11/10 Francisco Garcia Perez :
> > Bacula-dir Version: 3.0.2
> > Bacula-sd Version: 2.4.4
> >
> > PLEASE HELP ME
>
> Your prob
Hello!,
I have a very important issue with Bacula, I have Bacula-dir and Bacula-fd
in one machine and Bacula-sd in another, Bacula-sd is conected via SCSI to a
Dell PowerVault 124-T, when I do a backup the log says that it is OK, but I
see in the log that there is no Files and Bytes writen to SD:
Hello,
I use Bacula-Server on Debian.
I make backups from Linux and Windows. And I can restor some files to
Linux and, I think to windows too.
But now I have a Problem with a restor to Windows.
I start the restor and in the interaktiv mod I can see the filesize of a
file. Then I make the restor,
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> "Erik P. Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>>> "Erik P. Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä
>>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a laptop running W2K which has received the "blue screen of
death
"Erik P. Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> > "Erik P. Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> I have a laptop running W2K which has received the "blue screen of
> >> death".
> >> In
> >> order to r
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> "Erik P. Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I have a laptop running W2K which has received the "blue screen of death".
>> In
>> order to recover properly I need information from that system. Information
>> which
>> is on my back-up f
"Erik P. Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I have a laptop running W2K which has received the "blue screen of death".
>In
> order to recover properly I need information from that system. Information
> which
> is on my back-up files. How do I restore the relev
I have a laptop running W2K which has received the "blue screen of death". In
order to recover properly I need information from that system. Information
which
is on my back-up files. How do I restore the relevant files to my linux system
so that my read this information?
--
Erik.
--
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 8 Sep 2007 at 2:42, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
>> At least we found a working solution (no concurrent jobs, because with
>> concurent jobs bacula was useless) hoping they will fix it sometime
>> when they receive enough proof that there IS a bug. You ca
Hello,
Saturday, September 8, 2007, 2:45:48 AM:
DL> On 8 Sep 2007 at 2:42, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> we have spent two weeks of testing until we found the root of the
>> problem (concurrent jobs) and we were 100% sure it is a bug. However
>> after I submitted it as a bug, it wa
On 8 Sep 2007 at 2:42, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have spent two weeks of testing until we found the root of the
> problem (concurrent jobs) and we were 100% sure it is a bug. However
> after I submitted it as a bug, it was closed as they couldn't
> replicate it, claiming we have
Hello,
we have spent two weeks of testing until we found the root of the
problem (concurrent jobs) and we were 100% sure it is a bug. However
after I submitted it as a bug, it was closed as they couldn't
replicate it, claiming we have a hardware problem (which we proved is
not the case) and requir
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
> just to mention again that while there were suggestions this is a
> hardware problem we did a lot of tests and proved the problem is not
> hadrware but there is a bug (which however was closed with "unable to
> reproduce" reason)
>
> As you are the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoff van Zyl wrote:
> On Friday 07 September 2007 08:32:41 Tom Sommer wrote:
>> On Thu, September 6, 2007 23:36, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>> Bacula 2.0.3, director is 32-bit CentOS 4.5, clients are all CentOS 4.5,
>>> both 32-bit and 64-bit. Backups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoff van Zyl wrote:
> On Friday 07 September 2007 08:32:41 Tom Sommer wrote:
>> On Thu, September 6, 2007 23:36, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>> Bacula 2.0.3, director is 32-bit CentOS 4.5, clients are all CentOS 4.5,
>>> both 32-bit and 64-bit. Backups
. I've also tried migrating to
a new pool that did not exist in the old library and I get the same errors
as above. The old library was attached to the director and I was having
problems so I attached it to the SD that has the Neo8000, so both libraries
are attached to the same c
On Friday 07 September 2007 08:32:41 Tom Sommer wrote:
> On Thu, September 6, 2007 23:36, Steve Thompson wrote:
> > Bacula 2.0.3, director is 32-bit CentOS 4.5, clients are all CentOS 4.5,
> > both 32-bit and 64-bit. Backups are to disk files.
> >
> > I find that I cannot do any restores:
> >
> >
>
On Thu, September 6, 2007 23:36, Steve Thompson wrote:
> Bacula 2.0.3, director is 32-bit CentOS 4.5, clients are all CentOS 4.5,
> both 32-bit and 64-bit. Backups are to disk files.
>
> I find that I cannot do any restores:
>
>
> 06-Sep 13:59 dante-sd: RestoreFiles.2007-09-06_13.58.29 Error:
> blo
Hello,
just to mention again that while there were suggestions this is a
hardware problem we did a lot of tests and proved the problem is not
hadrware but there is a bug (which however was closed with "unable to
reproduce" reason)
As you are the next case, can you please test it again ("have dele
Bacula 2.0.3, director is 32-bit CentOS 4.5, clients are all CentOS 4.5,
both 32-bit and 64-bit. Backups are to disk files.
I find that I cannot do any restores:
06-Sep 13:59 dante-sd: RestoreFiles.2007-09-06_13.58.29 Error: block.c:275
Volume data
error at 0:899088562! Wanted ID: "BB02
Hello,
I'm using bacula 1.36.2-2sarge1 on my linux Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 server
with a connected SSL 1016 LTO autochanger.
All the backup operation seems to be done correclty,
montly full, weekly differential, daily incremental.
Trying to restore a file from the last backup operation
everything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Erm, I ususally simply press the "Reply to all" button and remove the
> individual senders. (Which is necessary because Thunderbird doesn't
> handle mailing list mail better by itself - I miss a "Reply to list"
> button...)
A
Hello,
On 2/26/2007 7:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> After getting some storages together at last I have a really bad problem
> when I try to restore some files. As I got some Windows and some Linux
> Servers to Backup I put them onto different storages and here comes the
Hello everybody!
After getting some storages together at last I have a really bad problem
when I try to restore some files. As I got some Windows and some Linux
Servers to Backup I put them onto different storages and here comes the
problem:
I created the following job definition for the restore:
Hello everybody!
After getting some storages together at last I have a really bad problem
when I try to restore some files. As I got some Windows and some Linux
Servers to Backup I put them onto different storages and here comes the
problem:
I created the following job definition for the restore:
hanks,
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
> Lehmann
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:30 PM
> To: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
> Lehmann
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:30 PM
> To: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and
> wx-console
>
> H
haven't tried
it for a very long time, though.
Arno
> -Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Drescher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:11 AM
> To: David Hatcher
> Cc: Bacula-users@lists.s
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:11 AM
To: David Hatcher
Cc: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and
wx-console
> I just updated my Bacula server (Fedor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
Lehmann
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:30 PM
To: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and
wx-console
Hi,
On 1/25/2007 10:04 PM, David Hat
Greetings,
I just updated my Bacula server (Fedora Core 5), my Windows 2003 server,
and my Windows XP PC from Bacula v1.38.6 to v2.0.1. I'm running the
Bacula wx-console from my PC to perform some backup and restore tests on
my Win2003 server. My backup tests ran great. However, if I use the
"R
> I just updated my Bacula server (Fedora Core 5), my Windows 2003 server, and
> my Windows XP PC from Bacula v1.38.6 to v2.0.1. I'm running the Bacula
> wx-console from my PC to perform some backup and restore tests on my Win2003
> server. My backup tests ran great. However, if I use the
On 9/12/06, Alexander Nolte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Pedro,thanks for your reply. You are right in your suggestion that oneStorageDaemon runs on a USB rack. But this one only does an additional
weekly backup. The daily backups are written on an SCSII harddrive that ismounted in the same server
Hi Pedro,
thanks for your reply. You are right in your suggestion that one
StorageDaemon runs on a USB rack. But this one only does an additional
weekly backup. The daily backups are written on an SCSII harddrive that is
mounted in the same server as the director.
I think that I found the problem
On 9/9/06, Alexander Nolte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everybody!I just set up a Bacula System that will backup our 4 servers + some clients
but everytime I try to restore some files it just says:09-Sep 15:35 server-dir: Start Restore Jobrestore-server2-usb.2006-09-09_15.35.1309-Sep 15:35 Stor
Hello everybody!
I just set up a Bacula System that will backup our 4 servers + some clients
but everytime I try to restore some files it just says:
09-Sep 15:35 server-dir: Start Restore Job
restore-server2-usb.2006-09-09_15.35.13
09-Sep 15:35 StorageDaemon: Ready to read from volume "server-usb
That was the problem. What is the use of markdir?
Thanks,
ZK
--- Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:29, Zakai Kinan wrote:
> > Yes, I did mark the directory before attempting to
> > restore the files in it.
>
> You either did a "markdir", which will not
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:29, Zakai Kinan wrote:
> Yes, I did mark the directory before attempting to
> restore the files in it.
You either did a "markdir", which will not mark the files under the directory,
or the directory was empty. This is indicated by the fact that the restore
expected
Yes, I did mark the directory before attempting to
restore the files in it.
ZK
--- Georger Araujo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you
>
> mark
>
> the files you want to restore, as per page 265 of
> the
> manual? Regards,
>
> Georger
>
> --- Zakai Kinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> >
Did you
mark
the files you want to restore, as per page 265 of the
manual? Regards,
Georger
--- Zakai Kinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> I tried to restore a directory and I get the
> following;
>
> BTL: drwxrwxrwx 1 000
> 2006-08-02 09:27:38 /restore/c/DBbackup
I tried to restore a directory and I get the
following;
BTL: drwxrwxrwx 1 000
2006-08-02 09:27:38 /restore/c/DBbackup/
22-Aug 12:33 backup-dir: Bacula 1.38.9 (02May06):
22-Aug-2006 12:33:40
JobId: 168
Job:
RestoreFiles.2006-08-22_1
If you don't have enough space on your restoration device, some files or folders could be skipped. However, I don't have enough info to make that conclusion. Do you have the log file for your restore job? You should get an e-mail if you had Bacula set up to e-mail you too.
Check your append parame
Hi All,
I've a bacula box with 2Tb disk space and a tape and a manage the
backup of about 5 servers. I had to recover a folder accidentally
deleted by a net user (a folder of images made by one of graphics).
The folder wasn't used from months.
I backup with this schema o disk space
Hi ,
My Director ver is 1.38.0 whilest my Win32 ver on the client is 1.38.4 ,
can this be part of the problem? I've looked for the 1.38.0 version of
win32 but could'nt find it
Danie wrote:
Hi all ,
We've had the unfortunate event where one of our fileserver scsi
controllers finally wen
Hi all ,
We've had the unfortunate event where one of our fileserver scsi
controllers finally went kaput , we managed to setup a spare server. I
am now trying to restore the files to this new server but I'm getting
this puzzling error :
28-Mar 13:00 venus-dir: Start Restore Job
RestoreFiles
Hello,
On 2/15/2006 11:28 AM, Marcel Gsteiger wrote:
Hi all
I recently changed my database backup procedure to work through a FIFO. This
seems to work, at least if I look at the logs. Now I wanted to restore a
database from tape for testing, but not to a fifo, but to a regular file. This
res
Hi all
I recently changed my database backup procedure to work through a FIFO. This
seems to work, at least if I look at the logs. Now I wanted to restore a
database from tape for testing, but not to a fifo, but to a regular file. This
restore fails with the error message
15-Feb 10:01 leo-fd:
Hi!
>-Original Message-
>From: Arno Lehmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 12:56 PM
>To: Matt Bettinger
>Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem
>
>Hello,
>
>Matt Bettinger wrote:
>
&
Hello,
Matt Bettinger wrote:
Hello,
I'm running into a problem restoring a home directory on FreeBSD.
I am not sure what to make of the device busy message. I unmount and
remount the tape and attempt the restore again and it still fails.
Please view the message below let me know if more inf
Hello,
I'm running into a problem restoring a home directory on FreeBSD.
I am not sure what to make of the device busy message. I unmount and
remount the tape and attempt the restore again and it still fails.
Please view the message below let me know if more information is needed.
Thank you.
Hello Francesco,
Are you sure you are checking "/tmp/bacula-restores/" of "ServerOriginale" and
not at "localhost-dir"?.
El Viernes 08 Abril 2005 09:46, Francesco escribió:
> This is the last screen of bacula after a restore:
> ...
> ServerOriginale: -rwxrwxrwx 1 00 18230 20
This is the last screen of bacula after a restore:
...
ServerOriginale: -rwxrwxrwx 1 00 18230 2004-10-04 16:25:33 /
tmp/bacula-restores/d//inetpub/ADS/yahoo_adsl.htm
06-Apr 13:16 localhost-dir: Bacula 1.36.2 (28Feb05): 06-Apr-2005 13:16:48
JobId: 10
Job:
82 matches
Mail list logo
