> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:52:24 -0600
> From: Robert LeBlanc
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Matija Nalis
>
>> > wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:36:59AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>>> > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Matija Nalis
>>> > >
>>> > >
> > > I think you need to s
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Matija Nalis
> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:36:59AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Matija Nalis
> >
> >
> > > I think you need to set
> > > Prefer Mounted Volumes = no
> >
> > I guess this is where we need clarification ab
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:36:59AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Matija Nalis
> > I think you need to set
> > Prefer Mounted Volumes = no
>
> I guess this is where we need clarification about what is an available
> drive. I took this to mean a drive that has no tap
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Matija Nalis
> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:49:43AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > I have two LTO-3 drives in a changer and three LTO-3 pools. Earlier
> version
> > of Bacula would try to use an empty drive before unloading a drive when a
> > tape from a d
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:49:43AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> I have two LTO-3 drives in a changer and three LTO-3 pools. Earlier version
> of Bacula would try to use an empty drive before unloading a drive when a
> tape from a different pool was requested. I used to also be able to run in
> pa
I have two LTO-3 drives in a changer and three LTO-3 pools. Earlier version
of Bacula would try to use an empty drive before unloading a drive when a
tape from a different pool was requested. I used to also be able to run in
parallel migration jobs from two different pools at the same time. Since
m
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> I have two LTO-3 drives in a changer and three LTO-3 pools. Earlier version
> of Bacula would try to use an empty drive before unloading a drive when a
> tape from a different pool was requested. I used to also be able to run in
> parallel m
Hi Jeff,
> I'm using that same library at home, albeit with 3 drives instead of 2
> (helps to know the local Quantum/ATL service guys..) with 2 major
> pools.I have no problem using 2 drives simultaneously. There are
> several different locations where max jobs has to be tweaked to use
>
On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Matt Brown wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have tried following the documentation online, and seem to be having
> some issues with some links via google .. pages are no longer
> available ? I guess a recent website update has occurred ?
Yes, it has. Sorry, try adding /en/ a
Hi All,
I have tried following the documentation online, and seem to be having
some issues with some links via google .. pages are no longer
available ? I guess a recent website update has occurred ?
What I am trying to do is the following:
I have a client defined with multiple jobs (about 8
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 10:46, John Drescher wrote:
> On 9/25/06, Michael Brennen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am running current CVS. Per discussion a day or so ago, I added
> > 'Prefer Mounted Volumes = no' to my JobDefs tonight, reloaded, and ran a
> > couple of backups that I know use
On 9/25/06, Michael Brennen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am running current CVS. Per discussion a day or so ago, I added'Prefer Mounted Volumes = no' to my JobDefs tonight, reloaded, and ran acouple of backups that I know use different volumes. The new parameter
made no difference; drive 0 was un
I am running current CVS. Per discussion a day or so ago, I added
'Prefer Mounted Volumes = no' to my JobDefs tonight, reloaded, and ran a
couple of backups that I know use different volumes. The new parameter
made no difference; drive 0 was unloaded each time and only it was
used. Snippets
Hello,
On 1/12/2006 10:33 AM, redhat admin wrote:
Arno Lehmann wrote:
On 1/11/2006 12:03 PM, redhat admin wrote:
...
Pointer: Mailing list archive, Jan 29 2005, Mario Wolff, Subject:
Using multiple tapedrives as autochanger! and at least one folluwup to
that mail.
Remember: Untested, and thi
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/11/2006 12:03 PM, redhat admin wrote:
>
>> I've searched the users mailing list archive and not found an answer,
>> I've seen many people ask a similar question to no avail. I'm now going
>> to post here to see if you guys can help.
>
>
> Sure, we can _always
Hello,
On 1/11/2006 12:03 PM, redhat admin wrote:
I've searched the users mailing list archive and not found an answer,
I've seen many people ask a similar question to no avail. I'm now going
to post here to see if you guys can help.
Sure, we can _always_ help ;-)
Basically, I have 2 DLT dr
I've searched the users mailing list archive and not found an answer,
I've seen many people ask a similar question to no avail. I'm now going
to post here to see if you guys can help.
Basically, I have 2 DLT drives (not a library or autochanger) and would
like to know how I can have them both wor
On 11/28/2005 11:31 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Yes, you should file a bug report. That ensures that it will not be forgotten
> and will be fixed. However, since I already have a test case, there is no
> need for you to do anything with regress.
Bug report submitted:
http://bugs.bacula.org/bu
On Monday 28 November 2005 23:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just to let you know...
>
> On 28.11.2005 17:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > For Arno, I have created a new script that is similar to the setup that
> > is failing for him as he describes it, and now it is time for him to run
Hello,
just to let you know...
On 28.11.2005 17:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
...
For Arno, I have created a new script that is similar to the setup that is
failing for him as he describes it, and now it is time for him to run that
script and then modify it to create the failure. Arno's script is
On Monday 28 November 2005 16:22, Joshua Myles wrote:
> On 11/15/2005 08:07 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 November 2005 13:59, Joshua Myles wrote:
> >>On 11/14/2005 04:45 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>>I just took a look at my multiple drive regression test. In fact, I ran
> >>>it to mak
On Monday 28 November 2005 16:22, Joshua Myles wrote:
> On 11/15/2005 08:07 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 November 2005 13:59, Joshua Myles wrote:
> >>On 11/14/2005 04:45 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>>I just took a look at my multiple drive regression test. In fact, I ran
> >>>it to mak
On 11/15/2005 08:07 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 November 2005 13:59, Joshua Myles wrote:
>
>>On 11/14/2005 04:45 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>
>>>I just took a look at my multiple drive regression test. In fact, I ran
>>>it to make sure it works. Yes, it works, and it writes on both dri
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 13:59, Joshua Myles wrote:
> On 11/14/2005 04:45 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > I just took a look at my multiple drive regression test. In fact, I ran
> > it to make sure it works. Yes, it works, and it writes on both drives.
> > However I'm really embarassed to say that
On 11/14/2005 04:45 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I just took a look at my multiple drive regression test. In fact, I ran it
> to
> make sure it works. Yes, it works, and it writes on both drives. However I'm
> really embarassed to say that I was completely wrong -- it does not write to
> two dri
On Monday 14 November 2005 16:35, Joshua Myles wrote:
> On 11/14/2005 10:32 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > By the way, I saw several emails from someone who said that he could not
> > get multiple concurrent jobs working on multiple drives, but I haven't
> > had any problems here -- with my test scrip
On Monday 14 November 2005 16:35, Joshua Myles wrote:
> On 11/14/2005 10:32 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > By the way, I saw several emails from someone who said that he could not
> > get multiple concurrent jobs working on multiple drives, but I haven't
> > had any problems here -- with my test scrip
On 11/14/2005 10:35 AM, Joshua Myles wrote:
> I'm still having this issue, but was going to wait until 1.38.1 to dig
> into it again.
Oops, I should've referred to the earlier thread on this as well:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.bacula.general/18307
Looks like others are ha
On 11/14/2005 10:32 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> By the way, I saw several emails from someone who said that he could not get
> multiple concurrent jobs working on multiple drives, but I haven't had any
> problems here -- with my test scripts.
/me waves.
I'm still having this issue, but was going
Hello,
On Monday 14 November 2005 16:05, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am wondering if anyone successfully managed to simultaneously execute
> two+ jobs on a backup library with multiple drives? At the moment, I am
> using 1.36, which doesn't have support for executing of two or more j
Hello,
I am wondering if anyone successfully managed to simultaneously execute
two+ jobs on a backup library with multiple drives? At the moment, I am
using 1.36, which doesn't have support for executing of two or more jobs
on multiple drive systems. As i remember, a while ago, there has been a
di
31 matches
Mail list logo
