Re: [Bacula-users] Device names changing in Debian 11 - can I switch to /dev/tape/by-id from /dev/sgX and /dev/nstX ?

On 4/6/22 10:24, Matthew Weatherford wrote: Hi Bacula gurus, We are loving using Bacula on Debian 11 - have been long time users. Thank you to all who are supporting this great code base Using Debian 11, Bacula version 9.6.7-3, and the Oracle SL150 tape loader with both SAS and Fiber channel t

[Bacula-users] Device names changing in Debian 11 - can I switch to /dev/tape/by-id from /dev/sgX and /dev/nstX ?

Hi Bacula gurus, We are loving using Bacula on Debian 11 - have been long time users. Thank you to all who are supporting this great code base Using Debian 11, Bacula version 9.6.7-3, and the Oracle SL150 tape loader with both SAS and Fiber channel tape drives (2 of each) From time to tim

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume "File-0"

Hi, I am a newbie to Bacula. I tried to find out what is happening and could not get right answer. Probably I am not searching with the right question or looking at the right place. I removed all volumes from the machine and deleted them from Bacula. Then I proceed to the some jobs. I've done 3

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED. User unmounted. How change to enable?

Hi. After umount volumen to slot. the status devices is BLOCKED. Device is BLOCKED. User unmounted. How to change status device? Always mount volumen (mount...) or restart SDfor Enable the device. -- # # Sistema Operativo: Debian # #Cara

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume

-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume On 1/18/2018 2:21 PM, Ryan Butler wrote: Hello all, I recently inherited a Bacula installation (version 7.0.5, running on a CentOS 6 server), but have no experience with Bacula. Full backups go t

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume

On 1/18/2018 2:21 PM, Ryan Butler wrote: Hello all, I recently inherited a Bacula installation (version 7.0.5, running on a CentOS 6 server), but have no experience with Bacula. Full backups go to tape, with incremental backups going to a local disk on the Bacula server. The tape backups ha

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume

Hello all, I recently inherited a Bacula installation (version 7.0.5, running on a CentOS 6 server), but have no experience with Bacula. Full backups go to tape, with incremental backups going to a local disk on the Bacula server. The tape backups have so far been (mostly) successful. However,

[Bacula-users] Device and Volume contentions since upgrade from 7.4.7 to 9.0.3

Hello everyone, First, let me start by saying that I am using Josh's excellent vchanger program in conjunction with removable SATA drives, and have documented my configuration several years back here: http://www.revpol.com/offsitebackups This configuration has worked exceedingly well for me with

Re: [Bacula-users] Device blocked

On 12/19/2016 4:17 AM, webmas...@peter-speer.de wrote: > Hi list. > I am stucked and looking for help. > > When I run bconsole status for storage I get the following: > Device status: > Device "FileStorage" (/tmp) is not open. > Device "Nas01Storage" (/nas01_backup/backup) is not open. > Devi

[Bacula-users] Device blocked

Hi list. I am stucked and looking for help. When I run bconsole status for storage I get the following: Device status: Device "FileStorage" (/tmp) is not open. Device "Nas01Storage" (/nas01_backup/backup) is not open. Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for: Pool:NasPoo

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED. User unmounted during wait for media/moun

I was ready and unblocking +-- |This was sent by nirvana...@hotmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED. User unmounted during wait for media/moun

ot;bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED. User unmounted during wait for media/moun someone to help me, I have a robot hp MSL2024 two drive, and storage status appears next thing I miss me? dir annex information file and sd Device status: Autochange

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED. User unmounted during wait for media/moun

someone to help me, I have a robot hp MSL2024 two drive, and storage status appears next thing I miss me? dir annex information file and sd Device status: Autochanger "Autochanger" with devices: "Drive-0" (/dev/nst0) "Drive-1" (/dev/nst1) Device "FileStorage" (/home/bacula) is not open. Dev

[Bacula-users] Device "NULL" requested by DIR is disabled.

Hello. I spent a few days with this error, but can't understand where is mistake. Google tells, that this misconfiguration between sd.conf and dir.conf, but it's identical. This error at SD log. On the Dir log i can see next: Storage daemon didn't accept Device "NULL" because: Device "NULL" not

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for..

I had the same issue and after investigate for a long one day. This work for me: 1. In the file bacula-dir.conf where is defined the pool, put the label: Label Format = Catalog- (in my case I'm backing catalog and the label of the file is "Catalog") Example: Pool { Name = Catalog Pool Type

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED - renamed Bugged or not?

On 4/25/2015 1:50 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > In my last email, I did forget to mention that as you point out, the > problem can also result from a design issue. And the resolution of > those problems from design issues fall into my point 2. If we have a > good test case that shows the problem, ev

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED - renamed Bugged or not?

Hello Ana, One of the big race conditions that is not yet solved, because it takes a major rewrite, that is waiting on me having some free time is the case where two jobs attempt to use the same drive at the same time for different Volumes.  This leads to a

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED - renamed Bugged or not?

​I'm glad to read so good news. Thank you Kern.​ ​I have been ​trying to understand this issue that a Bacula user has been facing. As Kern said, it is really difficult to replicate it. We noticed that his backups worked fine for days and suddenly a "DEVICE is blocked" appeared. Some details about

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED - renamed Bugged or not?

In my last email, I did forget to mention that as you point out, the problem can also result from a design issue. And the resolution of those problems from design issues fall into my point 2. If we have a good test case that shows the problem, even if it results from a design decision, most of th

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED - renamed Bugged or not?

back >>> into its slot and Bacula should mount it for you. >>> >>> You may need to use a combination of #4 and one of the other options. >>> If none of the above corrects the issue, you may need to restart both >>> your director and storage daemons and start

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED - renamed Bugged or not?

I guess it is semantics, but I was just pointing out that it was not a coding issue, but rather a design issue/choice. You can divide the jobs into different pools and then give jobs in the same pools different priorities. The pools allow multiple jobs (from different pools) to run concurrently

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED - renamed Bugged or not?

/dev/nst1) open but no Bacula volume is currently >>mounted. >> Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume "NY5039L4", >> Pool: Billable >> Media type: LTO-4 >> Slot 1 is loaded in drive 0. >> Total Bytes Read=

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED

; To: Radosław Korzeniewski > mailto:rados...@korzeniewski.net>> > Cc: bacula-users > mailto:bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED > > Hi , > > Yes, I tried to mount from bconsole-->mount, but still error is same.

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED

AM To: Radosław Korzeniewski mailto:rados...@korzeniewski.net>> Cc: bacula-users mailto:bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED Hi , Yes, I tried to mount from bconsole-->mount, but still error is same. Appreciate if some can quickly help

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED

Ankush Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED Hello, 2015-04-23 13:28 GMT+02:00 More, Ankush mailto:ankush.m...@capgemini.com>>: Hi Team, We have bacula 7.x with tape auto-changer. I am getting below error in “status” and backup stop ( list jobs show

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED

Hello, 2015-04-23 13:28 GMT+02:00 More, Ankush : > Hi Team, > > > > We have bacula 7.x with tape auto-changer. > > I am getting below error in “status” and backup stop ( list jobs show as > running). > > I notice when I run “/usr/libexec/bacula/mtx-changer” tape "NY5039L4" > is mounted in D

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED

Hi Team, We have bacula 7.x with tape auto-changer. I am getting below error in "status" and backup stop ( list jobs show as running). I notice when I run "/usr/libexec/bacula/mtx-changer" tape "NY5039L4" is mounted in Drive. Then why bacula show BLOCKED. How to resolve this issue? Is there

Re: [Bacula-users] Device "FileStorage" is not open.

how can I mount the volume? Luisc Sent from my iPad On Aug 7, 2013, at 11:39 PM, John Drescher wrote: >> Hi everyone, Hi Everyone, I'm getting this error: >> >> Device status: Device "FileStorage" (/BaculaData) is not open > This not an error. This is the expected output when the volume is no

Re: [Bacula-users] Device "FileStorage" is not open.

> Hi everyone, Hi Everyone, I'm getting this error: > > Device status: Device "FileStorage" (/BaculaData) is not open > This not an error. This is the expected output when the volume is not mounted. John -- Get 100% visib

[Bacula-users] Device "FileStorage" is not open.

Hi everyone, Hi Everyone, I'm getting this error: Device status: Device "FileStorage" (/BaculaData) is not open After I've reinstalled a Client-PC, I did a full backup for that client, but my file media 203 reached the limit 80GB, so I decided to replace the file 203 by other I've copied a week b

Re: [Bacula-users] Device clean lto4

On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:42:59PM +0200, Alberto Amo Garrido wrote: > Hello. How and how ofren, you have to load de device clean lto4??? > > -- You should see a message in the lc display of your tape library when the dri

[Bacula-users] Device clean lto4

Hello. How and how ofren, you have to load de device clean lto4??? -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-p

Re: [Bacula-users] Device not in SD Device resources

Am 25.10.2012 11:48, schrieb dsi: > Storage { > Name = Repositorio_NAS > Address = 127.0.0.1 Not good. You should always put the real FQDN or IP address of your SD here. HTH -- Tilman Schmidt Phoenix Software GmbH Bonn, Germany -

[Bacula-users] Device not in SD Device resources

Hi all, I'm trying the bacula software for backups. I'm trying the WBSAirback web frontend. Basically is a tomcat server for manage the differents options. It is very useful. The problem that I'm having is the next: When I try to run a job, it shows me the message "Device not in SD Device reso

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume...

> bconsole > mount ? > Yes. Did you check to see if the volume file bacula wants exists and is readable by user bacula? John -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's securi

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume...

> I've just got this messagem from bconsole > status sd when a backup job > runs. Also got is waiting for a mount request on the running jobs. > I got other jobs from this server that runs normally. I've tried to restart > bacula-dir and bacula-sd but it doesn't help. The volumes are stored in > fi

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume...

Hi I've just got this messagem from bconsole > status sd when a backup job runs. Also got is waiting for a mount request on the running jobs. I got other jobs from this server that runs normally. I've tried to restart bacula-dir and bacula-sd but it doesn't help. The volumes are stored in files on

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is blocked labeling a Volume

Am 01.03.2012 16:58, schrieb Tilman Schmidt: > For lack of a better idea, I have now restarted all Bacula daemons. > That cleared the condition, and I could load and unload tapes again: [...] > The hanging jobs were all gone, of course. They did neither > generate any status mails nor leave any tra

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is blocked labeling a Volume

Am 01.03.2012 10:41, schrieb Uwe Schuerkamp: > Hmm, I was "hoping" for some scsi timeouts or similar which might > explain why the device is apparently stuck labelling a tape... do you > have physical access to the device? Any status lights indicating an > error condition (obvious detail, but I'd r

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is blocked labeling a Volume

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:32:18AM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Nothing since the last reboot except the normal "Block limits": > > [ts@backup ~]$ dmesg | tail > ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready > RPC: Registered udp transport module. > RPC: Registered tcp transport module. > RPC: R

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is blocked labeling a Volume

Am 01.03.2012 09:30, schrieb Uwe Schuerkamp: >> Device status: >> Autochanger "HP1x8autoloader" with devices: >>"LTO-3" (/dev/nst0) >> Device "FileStorage" (/tmp) is not open. >> Device "LTO-3" (/dev/nst0) is not open. >> Device is blocked labeling a Volume. >> Drive 0 is not loaded.

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is blocked labeling a Volume

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:28:00AM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > CentOS 6 based backup server with Bacula 5.0.0-9.el6 from the CentOS 6 > base repository and an HP 8-slot LTO-3 autochanger, no barcode reader. > This evening's backup jobs are han

[Bacula-users] Device is blocked labeling a Volume

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 CentOS 6 based backup server with Bacula 5.0.0-9.el6 from the CentOS 6 base repository and an HP 8-slot LTO-3 autochanger, no barcode reader. This evening's backup jobs are hanging, with the first one in state "running" but not making any progress, and

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume -- backups failing (bacula 5.2.2)

[Replying to my own post to clarify that unloading/loading/mounting does NOT solve the issue.] In the message dated: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:52:12 EST, The pithy ruminations from mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu on <[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume -- backups failing (bac

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume -- backups failing (bacula 5.2.2)

I just upgraded from 5.0.2 to 5.2.2 in the hope that the bug fixes solve a persistent problem that we've been having (for previous reports and more details, see [1]). Unfortunately, the problem still exists, occurs frequently, and causes backups to be very unreliable. In short, bacula will cal

Re: [Bacula-users] "Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume" when the volume is already in the drive

i had the same issue one year ago when i tried the "virtual full" feature. . i also posted the problem on the devel list but nobody seems interested in fixing this bug. i switched to rsync disk based backups maybe you'll find a suitable solution . Dil "Mark Bergman" a écrit dans le messa

[Bacula-users] "Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume" when the volume is already in the drive

We're still experiencing the same problem I described last week (please see below). The only update I can offer is that the problem is not dependent on the specific tape drive. If all tapes are unloaded and bacula loads a volume into drive0 (as opposed to drive1 as described below), then bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for

scar writes: >> So I used the "label" command to create the volume S1Vol0809 in the >> appropriate pool, and it seems to have liked it so far, as "ls -l" tells me: >> -rw-r- 1 bacula tape201 2011-07-28 14:51 S1Vol0809 >> >> and yet, my backup is still stuck. > >if you check the SD sta

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hymie! @ 07/28/2011 12:12 PM: > So I used the "label" command to create the volume S1Vol0809 in the > appropriate pool, and it seems to have liked it so far, as "ls -l" tells me: > -rw-r- 1 bacula tape201 2011-07-28 14:51 S1Vol0809 > > a

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for

Greetings. So bacula has been running fine for a while, until it suddenly stopped on 12 July. The message I am seeing is this: Device status: Device "FileStorage" (/disk1/bacula-backups/) is mounted with: Volume: S1Vol0809 Pool:Pool1 Media type: File Device is BLOC

Re: [Bacula-users] Device

On 7/11/2011 4:30 PM, Josh Fisher wrote: > No, whitespace does not matter, and Bacula would tell you if there were > a config error. Maybe there were jobs already running when you issued > the reload command in bconsole to bring in the config changes? Try > restarting SD and DIR and see if the prob

Re: [Bacula-users] Device

On 7/11/2011 2:28 PM, Mike Hobbs wrote: > On 07/11/2011 11:52 AM, Josh Fisher wrote: > >> My understanding is that if AllowMixedPriority=yes, then the higher >> priority job should run before any other queued lower priority jobs. >> Although it will not preempt already running jobs, it should star

Re: [Bacula-users] Device

On 07/11/2011 11:52 AM, Josh Fisher wrote: > Did any of the jobs that ran just after those two write to the same > volume? What was the status (from 'status dir' command) of the jobs that > were not running when only two jobs were running? Sorry, I probably should have cut and pasted that informat

Re: [Bacula-users] Device

On 7/10/2011 11:14 AM, Mike Hobbs wrote: > On 6/29/2011 5:05 PM, Josh Fisher wrote: >> By default, Bacula will select a volume that is already in a drive in >> preference to a volume not in a drive. For concurrent jobs writing to >> the same pool, this means they will always select the same volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Device

On 7/10/2011 11:14 AM, Mike Hobbs wrote: > I've had concurrent backups working fine for the past few days, this > morning I login to check my server and I noticed that bacula/vchanger is > only using 2 of my 4 virtual drives. I don't understand why, could you > point me in the right direction to f

Re: [Bacula-users] Device

On 6/29/2011 5:05 PM, Josh Fisher wrote: > By default, Bacula will select a volume that is already in a drive in > preference to a volume not in a drive. For concurrent jobs writing to > the same pool, this means they will always select the same volume. Thus > if you set MaximumConcurrentJobs=1 in

Re: [Bacula-users] Device

On 6/29/2011 11:38 AM, Mike Hobbs wrote: > On 06/28/2011 04:38 PM, Josh Fisher wrote: >> It isn't necessary. jbod1-drive-1, jbod1-drive-2, etc. are virtual >> drives. The ArchiveDevice path in each virtual drive contains a symlink. >> The symlink is created by vchanger to point to the folder conta

Re: [Bacula-users] Device

On 06/28/2011 04:38 PM, Josh Fisher wrote: > It isn't necessary. jbod1-drive-1, jbod1-drive-2, etc. are virtual > drives. The ArchiveDevice path in each virtual drive contains a symlink. > The symlink is created by vchanger to point to the folder containing the > volume file that is to be used. Any

Re: [Bacula-users] Device

On 6/28/2011 2:23 PM, Mike Hobbs wrote: > I'm almost ready with putting bacula into production but I'm still > debugging a few things and one of them is the "Device" line in my bacula > mail reports, and I was hoping someone could help me with this. > > I'm running disk-based backups. Bacula 5.0.

[Bacula-users] Device

I'm almost ready with putting bacula into production but I'm still debugging a few things and one of them is the "Device" line in my bacula mail reports, and I was hoping someone could help me with this. I'm running disk-based backups. Bacula 5.0.3, Vchanger 0.8.6 and a 16-bay Promise jbod. I

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:

Hello Any idea how I solve this message: Device "DELL-0" (Tape2) is mounted with: Volume: AC0485 Pool:ProductionArchive Media type: Ultrium1 Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for: Pool:ProductionArchive Media type: Ultriu

Re: [Bacula-users] Device Error

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Robert Longfield wrote: > yes the tape drive has a barcode scanner. i tried the 'update slots' message > and i got the following error: > > Automatically selected Storage: PV-122T > Connecting to Storage daemon PV-122T at localhost:9103 ... > 3306 Issuing autochang

Re: [Bacula-users] Device Error

yes the tape drive has a barcode scanner. i tried the 'update slots' message and i got the following error: Automatically selected Storage: PV-122T Connecting to Storage daemon PV-122T at localhost:9103 ... 3306 Issuing autochanger "slots" command. Device "PV-122T" has 0 slots. No slots in changer

Re: [Bacula-users] Device Error

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Robert Longfield wrote: > I don't believe it has two drives in it. i've removed the second entry from > bacula-sd as I was running into a problem when I tried to run a job. > > I've restarted all the services since removing the pv122T-2 lines from the > -sd.conf fi

Re: [Bacula-users] Device Error

I don't believe it has two drives in it. i've removed the second entry from bacula-sd as I was running into a problem when I tried to run a job. I've restarted all the services since removing the pv122T-2 lines from the -sd.conf file and when I do a 'run' from bconsole followed by a 'status' on "s

Re: [Bacula-users] Device Error

2011/5/5 Robert Longfield : > John, > > the online guidE I followed should setting up the pv-122t with -1 and -2 so > I can't really give you a reason as to why I have them in my config, other > than i was told that was the correct way. > Does your pv-122T have 1 or 2 drives? I am not familiar wi

Re: [Bacula-users] Device Error

John, the online guidE I followed should setting up the pv-122t with -1 and -2 so I can't really give you a reason as to why I have them in my config, other than i was told that was the correct way. Greg, thise changes seem to have worked. Well I am not getting the errors anymore when i try to r

Re: [Bacula-users] Device Error

I know I sent this to the mailing list and please forgive me for trying again but I am really at a loss of what my next step needs to be to get backup working. A bit on my setup. I am running Debian 6 with a Dell Powervault 122T. I can load tapes, and mount the tapes but when I tr y to run a

Re: [Bacula-users] Device Error

2011/5/4 Robert Longfield : > I know I sent this to the mailing list and please forgive me for trying > again but I am really at a loss of what my next step needs to be to get > backup working. > > A bit on my setup. I am running Debian 6 with a Dell Powervault 122T. I can > load tapes, and mount t

[Bacula-users] Device Error

I know I sent this to the mailing list and please forgive me for trying again but I am really at a loss of what my next step needs to be to get backup working. A bit on my setup. I am running Debian 6 with a Dell Powervault 122T. I can load tapes, and mount the tapes but when I tr y to run a bacup

Re: [Bacula-users] Device FileStorage is not open or does not exist

Problem solved. The database was corrupted. Thanks for the help. Bill From: Kenney, William P. (Information Technology Services) [mailto:kenn...@easternct.edu] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 9:07 PM To: Kleber Leal; bacula-users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device FileStorage is not

Re: [Bacula-users] Device FileStorage is not open or does not exist

Thanks, I'll check the SD config file closely. Bill From: Kleber Leal [mailto:kleber.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 8:49 PM To: bacula-users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device FileStorage is not open or does not exist Probably you has not created the dire

Re: [Bacula-users] Device FileStorage is not open or does not exist

Probably you has not created the directory defined into bacula-sd.conf file. Kleber 2011/3/31 Kenney, William P. (Information Technology Services) < kenn...@easternct.edu> > Hello all, > > > > I have given up on RHES 6 for now and I am using Ubuntu 10.10 Server with > Bacula 5.0.2 > > > > I have

[Bacula-users] Device FileStorage is not open or does not exist

Hello all, I have given up on RHES 6 for now and I am using Ubuntu 10.10 Server with Bacula 5.0.2 I have followed the Documentation's tutorial to get the system configured but while in the console portion (pages 98 - 101) I enter status storage and get "Device FileStorage is not open or doe

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for - (I assumed file devices auto created volumes?)

On 30/12/2010 19:52, Kleber Leal wrote: It seems your have not auto label enabled. Can you post your config files? Just remove your passwords. Kleber 2010/12/30 Mister IT Guru > I've run into a problem, which seems to be expected with tape changers, but I

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for - (I assumed file devices auto created volumes?)

It seems your have not auto label enabled. Can you post your config files? Just remove your passwords. Kleber 2010/12/30 Mister IT Guru > I've run into a problem, which seems to be expected with tape > changers, but I have disk based storage. I am under the assumption that > when auto-label is

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for - (I assumed file devices auto created volumes?)

I've run into a problem, which seems to be expected with tape changers, but I have disk based storage. I am under the assumption that when auto-label is enabled, that a new volume will be automatically created when required. I can't babysit the backups and manually mount and create new volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED

2010/12/28 yesi : > Hello, > > I'm using : Version: 5.0.2 > I have a pool "daily". > My volume LT1008L5 and LT1010L5 belong this pool. > For some reason, i can not backup, because of this error : > > "status dir" tell me that my job is waiting for a mount request > "status storage=Drive-1" give me

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED

Hello, I'm using : Version: 5.0.2 I have a pool "daily". My volume LT1008L5 and LT1010L5 belong this pool. For some reason, i can not backup, because of this error : 1. "status dir" tell me that my job* is waiting for a mount request* 2. "status storage=Drive-1" give me this message : Devi

Re: [Bacula-users] Device "FileStorage" with MediaType "File" requested by DIR not found in SD Device resources.

Martin Simmons schrieb: > The most likely reasons I can think of are > * the config file is corrupted, e.g. extra entries at the start > Ok, i think this was the problem, but i don't know how this happen, perhaps c&p or something. But now the Backup works, and also over some days. Thanks for yo

Re: [Bacula-users] Device "FileStorage" with MediaType "File" requested by DIR not found in SD Device resources.

> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:05:01 +0200, Roger Meier said: > > The Device Status Part of "status storage=File" prints out the following: > > Device status: > Device "File" (/data/backup) is not open. > Device "LTO-2" (/dev/nst0) is not open. > Device "LTO-3" (/dev/nst1) is not open. OK, this sh

Re: [Bacula-users] Device "FileStorage" with MediaType "File" requested by DIR not found in SD Device resources.

Martin Simmons schrieb: > What does > > status storage=File > > print, in particular the "Device status" part? > The Device Status Part of "status storage=File" prints out the following: Device status: Device "File" (/data/backup) is not open. Device "LTO-2" (/dev/nst0) is not open. Device "LTO

Re: [Bacula-users] Device "FileStorage" with MediaType "File" requested by DIR not found in SD Device resources.

> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:35:41 +0200, Roger Meier said: > > Hi all > > We have some problem with bacula. I don't know where the Problem is, > because all of our > 7 hosts have the same configuration (only different include/exclude file > list and hostname) > > All works fine now for some wee

[Bacula-users] Device "FileStorage" with MediaType "File" requested by DIR not found in SD Device resources.

Hi all We have some problem with bacula. I don't know where the Problem is, because all of our 7 hosts have the same configuration (only different include/exclude file list and hostname) All works fine now for some weeks, but now since 3-4 days we have the following problem, on some of our system

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:...

Ralf Gross schrieb: > John Drescher schrieb: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Ralf Gross wrote: > > > > > > *list media pool=INV-MPC-Differential > > > +-++---+-++--+--+-+--+---+---+

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:...

John Drescher schrieb: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Ralf Gross wrote: > > > > *list media pool=INV-MPC-Differential > > +-++---+-++--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ > > | mediaid | vol

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:...

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Ralf Gross wrote: > Hi, > > bacula 3.0.2 (updated 3 weeks ago). Can anyone explain why bacula is not using > a volume from the INV-MPC-Differential pool? > > > status dir: > > [...] > Running Jobs: > Console connected at 10-Sep-09 12:06 > Console connected at 10-Se

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:...

Hi, bacula 3.0.2 (updated 3 weeks ago). Can anyone explain why bacula is not using a volume from the INV-MPC-Differential pool? status dir: [...] Running Jobs: Console connected at 10-Sep-09 12:06 Console connected at 10-Sep-09 12:19 JobId Level Name Status

Re: [Bacula-users] Device open but no Bacula Volume is mounted

> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:52:49 +0100, Kris Monstad said: > > Hi, > > We're using Bacual v2.2.5 on Centos 4.7. > > After a power cut which affected only our LTO4 drive (server on UPS) > none of our tapes are mounting properly. The output is as follows: > > > *mount LTO4 > block.c:995 Read e

Re: [Bacula-users] Device open but no Bacula Volume is mounted

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Kris Monstad wrote: > Hi, > > We're using Bacual v2.2.5 on Centos 4.7. > > After a power cut which affected only our LTO4 drive (server on UPS) > none of our tapes are mounting properly. The output is as follows: > > > *mount LTO4 > block.c:995 Read error on fd=5 a

[Bacula-users] Device open but no Bacula Volume is mounted

Hi, We're using Bacual v2.2.5 on Centos 4.7. After a power cut which affected only our LTO4 drive (server on UPS) none of our tapes are mounting properly. The output is as follows: *mount LTO4 block.c:995 Read error on fd=5 at file:blk 0:0 on device "LTO4" (/dev/st0). ERR=Input/output error.

[Bacula-users] Device open but no Bacula Volume is mounted

Hi, We're using Bacual v2.2.5 on Centos 4.7. After a power cut which affected only our LTO4 drive (server on UPS) none of our tapes are mounting properly. The output is as follows: *mount LTO4 block.c:995 Read error on fd=5 at file:blk 0:0 on device "LTO4" (/dev/st0). ERR=Input/output error. bl

[Bacula-users] Device not found or could not be opened

Hi, I have problem with autochanger and mounting volumes, when I want to mount volumes with bconsole I get "Device not found or could not be opened". I have 4 drives and problem is with 4: VTS-Robot_arch 5: VTS-Robot_arch2. When I start backup job with 4: VTS-Robot_arch or 5: VTS-Robot_arch2 it

[Bacula-users] Device and Media type not found

Hi All, I am using Bacula version  and I have the following error 25-Feb 11:36 server-sd JobId 9: Fatal error: Device "TapeDrive" with MediaType "LTO-4" requested by DIR not found in SD Device resources. 25-Feb 11:36 backupserver-dir JobId 9: Fatal error: Storage daemon didn't acce

[Bacula-users] Device and Media type not found

Hi All, I am using Bacula version and I have the following error 25-Feb 11:36 server-sd JobId 9: Fatal error: Device "TapeDrive" with MediaType "LTO-4" requested by DIR not found in SD Device resources. 25-Feb 11:36 backupserver-dir JobId 9: Fatal error: Storage daemon didn't accept De

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:

--- On Mon, 1/5/09, John Drescher wrote: > From: John Drescher > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for: > To: "Apple Jack" , "Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net" > > Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 6:23 AM > On M

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Teodor MICU wrote: > On 01/03/2009 12:20 PM, Apple Jack wrote: >> Device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0) is not open. >> Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for: > > From what I'm remembering I fixed this by adding this configuration option > in the "Pool" defi

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:

On 01/03/2009 12:20 PM, Apple Jack wrote: > Device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0) is not open. > Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for: From what I'm remembering I fixed this by adding this configuration option in the "Pool" definition: Accept Any Volume = yes # write on any

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Apple Jack wrote: > --- On Sat, 1/3/09, John Drescher wrote: > >> From: John Drescher >> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for: >> To: marvin...@yahoo.com >> Date: Saturday, January 3, 2009, 8:3

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:

Hi list, I have a recurring problem. 2 pools: poolA poolB 1. Overnight a job runs and does not find appendable media for poolA (which is correct) 2. I cancel the job 3. I start a job that writes to poolB, for which there are tapes in the autochanger In this scenario the director asks me to: Pl

  1   2   3   >