Try this-
strace bacula-fd -f -d 500 2>&1 | tee log.out
Then post log.out
-Aaron
Jason King wrote:
> Here is the output:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# bacula-fd -f -d 500
> Segmentation fault
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
>
> Not very helpful huh?
>
> Jason
>
> Per Andreas Buer wrote:
>
>> Jason King
nfiguration files. The failure is the same. But it appears only when
> I try to write on a new (prelabeled) volume. Can this be the problem?
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Marius
>
>
> Aaron Knister schrieb:
>> The problem is that your jobs are configured to use the tape drive as
ion you want to see?
>
> im using a split config, many files targeted at specific parts of the
> configuration (via the Include directive), also i havent changed
> _anything_ in the config layout from a week or so (a full and
> incremental backups worth)
>
>
> Aaron Knister wrote
having 1 volume, which is basically what i have
>
> i dont understand the flow of the storage daemon and if it uses the
> catalog (could this be caused by a catalog corruption?), so i cant
> really narrow this down, might be a bug then again might be me
> what i dont understand i
Is it a software raid 0?
Honestly I wouldn't worry about the load, especially if this system is
dedicated to bacula backup functions.
-Aaron
Mike Seda wrote:
> Aaron Knister wrote:
>> During the job run an "iostat -k 2" and tell me what the iowait
>> percentage i
|
> | 10 | bacula-pool-tape-catalog | 0 | 0 |
> Backup | B${NumVols:p/5/0/r}|
> | 11 | Scratch | 0 | 0 |
> Backup | * |
> ++----
What does a list pool show?
Dragos Gheorghe wrote:
> my setup worked ok both on scheduled jobs and bconsole run command,
> until today and for a couple of months now (on bacula 2 from 2 weeks)
> im working on Version: 2.0.1 (12 January 2007) i686-pc-linux-gnu redhat
> compiled from source on cent
Hi,
How does bacula handle the relationship between full jobs and
incrementals? In terms of volume retention, does it realize that even
though a tape's recycle flag is set, and it is configured to be
autopruned that a full backup contained on that tape is required for
current incrementals of th
During the job run an "iostat -k 2" and tell me what the iowait
percentage is. If it's over 20% you have a disk bottleneck and the CPU
is waiting on the disk to write/read data which will jack up your load.
It's also possible that the calculation of md5 sigs is adding a bit of
CPU overhead. Wha
Uncomment the following line-
#Max Run Time = 1h
I believe this defines the maximum amount of time the job will run. However if
the job is running and goes for longer than 2 hours it will be killed. You may
want to edit your "RunBeforeJob" script to check for the tape "mt -f /dev/nst0
status"
The problem is that your jobs are configured to use the tape drive as
the storage as opposed to the loader.
The following line in your dir config -
Storage = VXA-320
Should be changed to
Storage = ExabytePacketloader1Ux10
Also add this line to your sd config in the VXA-320 section-
Changer
I have an ADIC i500 tape library with 36 slots and two LTO-3 tape
drives. There are currently 8 tapes in the loader and they're defined in
a storage pool (and labeled by bacula). I have two jobs that reference
this storage pool. However, when I run I can only get one of the drives
to work at a
I've seen input/output errors on my tape drive in 3 instances-
1) yes a failed tape
2) there is no tape in the drive
3) the joy that is errors on your SCSI chain (assuming your tape
drive is SCSI attached. try sacrificing a goat to your SCSI host bus
adapter...)
What kind of tape drive are yo
ually have two spindles like the old cassette tapes. If its
the latter then rewinding could be an issue. I'm not sure how bacula
handles that.
-Aaron
James P. Kinney III wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 09:30 -0500, Aaron Knister wrote:
>
>> I've seen input/output errors
From what I understand centos4 and rhel4 are interchangeable, at
least in this sense.
-Aaron
On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Michael Nelson wrote:
> I got it to start building with this instead of modifying the spec
> file:
> rpmbuild -ba --define "build_centos4 1" --define "build_mysql 1" --
Sorry. While not an excuse...I was not in a good mood this morning
and took yoru sarcasm personally. I myself am very sarcastic. Anyway.
Thanks for the advice, it's appreciated.
-Aaron
On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 08 January 2007 14:22, Aaron Knist
Thanks for the sarcasm. NOT. I come here for support, not to be
ridiculed. And i'll have you know that the restore from that backup
set did work.
On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2007 23:03, Aaron Knister wrote:
>> I solved this problem m
t off.
-Aaron
On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:29 PM, Aaron Knister wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently had a backup job fail mid way. It was backing up 5
> terabytes of data, and had written 3tb off to tape. The job stopped
> because there were no more writable volumes in the particular volume
> po
Hi,
I recently had a backup job fail mid way. It was backing up 5
terabytes of data, and had written 3tb off to tape. The job stopped
because there were no more writable volumes in the particular volume
pool to which the job was assigned. I cleared up a volume however the
job did not resume
19 matches
Mail list logo
