Folks,
We just bought a new system with 1.3 TB of RAID6 disk and HP LTO-3
tape drive for bacula. we will be keeping all the backups on the disk
except full backup which we want to copy to the tape and store it
offsite. We want to be able to restore files for any day for one month,
after that we
found this, didn't read it, but it mentions Bacula :)
http://searchstorage.techtarget.com.au/topics/article.asp?DocID=1299111
--
Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This SF.net email is spon
> So this deviation would be eliminated by:
> 1. changing %script_dir to %_libdir/bacula
> 2. changing the installed location of the rescue files from
%sysconf_dir
> to %script_dir?
I think this is correct, based on my reading of the FHS. It does seem to
address the complaints the SRB raised.
-
> Personally I think the official rpms should be FHS compliant
> for reasons that David Boyes articulated. He is quite correct about
> large enterprise IT departments. I could have you buy me beers for an
> entire evening and regale you with stupid IT stories from US Airways.
> Rigidity doesn't eve
John Drescher wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Mark Nienberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>
>> > Have you tried adding a delay in your mtxchanger script where it says
>> > it might be needed?
>>
>> In mtx-changer
>>
>> # Increase the sleep time if you have a slow
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Mark Nienberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>
> > Have you tried adding a delay in your mtxchanger script where it says
> > it might be needed?
>
> In mtx-changer
>
> # Increase the sleep time if you have a slow device
> # or remove the sleep
John Drescher wrote:
> Have you tried adding a delay in your mtxchanger script where it says
> it might be needed?
In mtx-changer
# Increase the sleep time if you have a slow device
# or remove the sleep and add the following:
# sleep 15
wait_for_drive $device
so it is using the wait
OK, so what would you all like "me" to do? Yes there are standards for
things like /usr/local/... but that would I think introduce some path
problems? Personally I think the official rpms should be FHS compliant
for reasons that David Boyes articulated. He is quite correct about
large enterprise IT
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Mark Nienberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm seeing this happen more often:
>
> 3304 Issuing autochanger "load slot 2, drive 0" command.
> 3305 Autochanger "load slot 2, drive 0", status is OK.
> 3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded? drive 0" command.
> 3302 Autoch
I'm seeing this happen more often:
3304 Issuing autochanger "load slot 2, drive 0" command.
3305 Autochanger "load slot 2, drive 0", status is OK.
3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded? drive 0" command.
3302 Autochanger "loaded? drive 0", result is Slot 2.
block.c:995 Read error on fd=6 at file:blk 0:
On Monday 03 March 2008 22.00:23 Frank Sweetser wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >> If you do it by reinstalling the OS from normal distro media, then you
> >> can also reinstall Bacula from rpms on a CD.
> >
> > As mentioned above, the binaries are not necessarily the most critical
> > part unless p
Hey list,
Dan Langille schrieb:
> James Harper wrote:
>> Does anyone know what 'unknown state i' means?
>>
>> >From a 'status dir':
>>
>> "
>> Running Jobs:
>> ...
>> 2031 Fullkalgan-file-full.2008-01-29_21.00.20 is in unknown state
>> i
>> ...
>> "
>>
>> The director runs 13 jobs each night
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:56 AM, thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we use bacula a long time(6 years) to backup linux and windows server.
> It works create!!!
>
> Now one harddisk (Raid5) is defect in the bacula server and we consider
> to buy a new server.
> I think we can buy a larg
On Monday 03 March 2008 08:46, David Boyes wrote:
> > Just to expand on this point a bit - as security enhancements such as
> > SELinux
> > become more commonplace, it's very realistic to expect that files that
>
> are
>
> > not
> > in directories indicated by security policy as holding executables
I am running Bacula 2.2.7 on Solaris 10_x86. When I make changes I usually
do the following:
Edit configuration file
Test with bacula-dir -t -c bacula-dir.conf
Launch bconsole and issue "reload" command
Recently I started getting these error messages after issuing a "reload"
03-Mar 16:16 mt-back
On Monday 03 March 2008 15.41:20 Frank Sweetser wrote:
> David Boyes wrote:
> >> There are standards such as FHS, and these are good and useful for
> >
> > most
> >
> >> programs, but they really do a big disservice to Bacula users when we
> >
> > are
> >
> >> dealing with recovery. If you spread
> "Frank" == Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Frank> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> If you do it by reinstalling the OS from normal distro media, then you can
>>> also reinstall Bacula from rpms on a CD.
>>
>> As mentioned above, the binaries are not necessarily the most critical part
>>
Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> If you do it by reinstalling the OS from normal distro media, then you can
>> also reinstall Bacula from rpms on a CD.
>
> As mentioned above, the binaries are not necessarily the most critical part
> unless perhaps you have applied a number of critical patches. The most
On Monday 03 March 2008 20.29:09 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:48:37 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> > Hello Scott,
> >
> > I've copied the bacula-users list because some people may not be aware of
> > the problems they are getting themselves into using *standard* packages
> >
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:35 -0500, David Boyes wrote:
> > There are standards such as FHS, and these are good and useful for
> most
> > programs, but they really do a big disservice to Bacula users when we
> are
> > dealing with recovery. If you spread the Bacula installation all
> around
> > your
Martin Simmons wrote:
> If you do it using a recovery disk, then you'll need to put all the critical
> files on that disk anyway. You can also include the Bacula rpms on the
> recovery disk, to allow them to be reinstalled on the server or on a new
> server. The plugins should also be installed
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:48:37 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> Hello Scott,
>
> I've copied the bacula-users list because some people may not be aware of the
> problems they are getting themselves into using *standard* packages to
> install Bacula.
>
> I *strongly* recommend that we completel
This is great too. Thanks Brian. This actually answers a question I was
going to pose about tapes. I have some tapes that I changed pool definitions
for, but wasn't quite sure how to update that on tape.
Thanks again
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Brian Debelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I
Thanks Arno. I just wanted confirmation from someone more experienced.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 29.02.2008 17:30, John Drescher wrote:
> >> By changing the Volume Use Duration in the Pool config, Bacula will
> pick up
> >> the change aft
On Mar 3, 2008, at 2:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Message: 16
> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:00:41 +0100
> From: Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Double/over scheduling
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: tex
> Just to expand on this point a bit - as security enhancements such as
> SELinux
> become more commonplace, it's very realistic to expect that files that
are
> not
> in directories indicated by security policy as holding executables
simply
> can't be run as programs. If Bacula throws binary execu
David Boyes wrote:
>> There are standards such as FHS, and these are good and useful for
> most
>> programs, but they really do a big disservice to Bacula users when we
> are
>> dealing with recovery. If you spread the Bacula installation all
> around
>> your
>> computer filesystem as most package
> There are standards such as FHS, and these are good and useful for
most
> programs, but they really do a big disservice to Bacula users when we
are
> dealing with recovery. If you spread the Bacula installation all
around
> your
> computer filesystem as most packages do and as the standards spec
Hi,
we use bacula a long time(6 years) to backup linux and windows server.
It works create!!!
Now one harddisk (Raid5) is defect in the bacula server and we consider
to buy a new server.
I think we can buy a large server with tapelibrary (DELL TL2000 LTO3).
Our consideration are:
- We want to ba
it JobId 37833: ClientRunBeforeJob: SNAP Shot backup
03-Mär 03:18 rabbit JobId 37833: ClientRunBeforeJob:
<<<<< i.e. Save directories..
03-Mär 03:18 rabbit JobId 37833: ClientRunBeforeJob: Sichere Verzeichnis
/backup/homebackup nach /backup/back1/backup-home.20080303.
Ok thank you guys it worked perfecty!
Who needs a company support having this great community ;-) !!!
El lun, 03-03-2008 a las 14:24 +0100, Vladimirs Vecgailis escribió:
> Roberto Nebot wrote:
> > Hello folks!
> >
> > I am getting the following error:
> >
> > Error: Bacula cannot write on tape V
On Mar 3, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Roberto Nebot wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I am getting the following error:
>
> Error: Bacula cannot write on tape Volume "mensual" because:
> The number of files mismatch! Volume=5 Catalog=4
>
> Does anyone know what can I do to make this volume writable?.
http://www.
Roberto Nebot wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I am getting the following error:
>
> Error: Bacula cannot write on tape Volume "mensual" because:
> The number of files mismatch! Volume=5 Catalog=4
>
> Does anyone know what can I do to make this volume writable?.
This should help:
http://www.bacula.or
Hello folks!
I am getting the following error:
Error: Bacula cannot write on tape Volume "mensual" because:
The number of files mismatch! Volume=5 Catalog=4
Does anyone know what can I do to make this volume writable?.
Thanks in advance.
---
Hi Kern,
In a sense I agree with your definition for rescue bacula.
But in real life, I would imagine this a bit differently.
In a production environement : bacula server is it's own server. ( Dir and SD
could be together ).
I really preconise to have a tar of this system made before/after every
Hello Scott,
I've copied the bacula-users list because some people may not be aware of the
problems they are getting themselves into using *standard* packages to
install Bacula.
I *strongly* recommend that we completely reconsider the package directories
that we use. The current way of instal
Hi,
I have a question about how to setup my backupjob correctly.
I have a backupserver with bacula installed. To there i take backup from
many remote hosts. Every host has its own backup-catalog on the server:
/backup/host1, /backup/host2 and so on. Every host has its own pool of
volumes.
I ha
Hi,
03.03.2008 07:59, Jesse Peterson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Firstly I want to thank the developers, contributors and users for
> helping make bacula a great product! For whatever it's worth it is
> of great use to us with Mac OS X, NetBSD, Linux and Windows!
>
> Secondly I'd like to ask is it known
38 matches
Mail list logo