Hi,

03.03.2008 07:59, Jesse Peterson wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Firstly I want to thank the developers, contributors and users for
> helping make bacula a great product! For whatever it's worth it is
> of great use to us with Mac OS X, NetBSD, Linux and Windows!
> 
> Secondly I'd like to ask is it known and acceptable that when a Job
> is already scheduled and its schedule passes another duplicate job
> gets scheduled?

This is know and this is how Bacula's scheduler works. In my opinion, 
this is a design issue and not a bug.

...
> THis seems like it should be avoidable. I imagine an option that
> makes jobs not get scheduled if the same job (job
> name,schedule,pool,etc.) already exists in the queue (only
> difference being the scheduled time). THoughts?

No need for furher thoughts :-)

This is currently being worked on - having a final result might take a 
while, though - and your idea was one of the options discussed.

Search for the mails with a subject of "Redundant Run in Schedule" in 
the list archives, both -users and -devel, and you'll even find a 
patch :-)

Arno

> Thanks! - Jesse
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges.
> Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ 
> _______________________________________________ Bacula-users
> mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> 

-- 
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
www.its-lehmann.de

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to