> Just to expand on this point a bit - as security enhancements such as > SELinux > become more commonplace, it's very realistic to expect that files that are > not > in directories indicated by security policy as holding executables simply > can't be run as programs. If Bacula throws binary executables in places > outside of FHS, it runs a risk of being shot down by those security > policies.
Well put. Regardless of how technically nice an alternative would be, it's automatically wrong if it's different from the standard. I don't much like FHS either -- it has some dumb decisions in it -- but we're stuck with it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
