See my notes below.
On Thursday 14 September 2006 01:34, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> Some data from my tests below. I'm working with current CVS (13/Sep)
> plus a few patches to make relabel work (I don't think that they will
> change behaviour of the second volume stuff).
>
> Note I've sent this d
On Thursday 14 September 2006 01:34, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> Some data from my tests below. I'm working with current CVS (13/Sep)
> plus a few patches to make relabel work (I don't think that they will
> change behaviour of the second volume stuff).
>
> Note I've sent this data to bacula-devel a
On Thursday 14 September 2006 00:07, Fred Dussault wrote:
> I think this might be related to my issue, I'm not sure, here is a
> snippet of my level 100 debug log for the storage daemon
> I could be way off base too...
As far as I can tell, Bacula is trying to reserve the same device to read and
As far as I can tell, Bacula is working perfectly normally, the only problem
is that Volume FNI0016 is bad or unreadable. You can turn on debug in the SD
say to level 400 using the setdebug command and then issue a mount command.
That might tell you more precisely why Bacula does not want to re
I was able just now to work further with the FNI0016 tape that was
not mounting. I purged and relabeled that particular tape, and now
it is mounting. All I can figure is that the tape label was lost
somehow. I don't remember a specific incident where that would have
happened, but I have had
> > So right now the "Volume Use" start time is set by the start time of
> > the first job stored on it.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:04:47PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I haven't looked at the code, but I believe it is based on the FirstWritten
> which is the time (if I am not mistaken) when
Some data from my tests below. I'm working with current CVS (13/Sep)
plus a few patches to make relabel work (I don't think that they will
change behaviour of the second volume stuff).
Note I've sent this data to bacula-devel and will post any follow-ups
there.
Regards
Richard
> -Original M
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 05:16 pm, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/13/2006 11:59 PM, Michael Brennen wrote:
> > A quick followup on the mount request mail I just sent...
> >
> > Using the console I unmounted and remounted that volume, and it still
> > asks for a mount. Current status is b
Hi,
On 9/13/2006 11:59 PM, Michael Brennen wrote:
> A quick followup on the mount request mail I just sent...
>
> Using the console I unmounted and remounted that volume, and it still asks
> for
> a mount. Current status is below.
Could you give the outout from the unmount and mount commands,
I think this might be related to my issue, I'm not sure, here is a
snippet of my level 100 debug log for the storage daemon
I could be way off base too...
3 dird dev: 3000 OK use device device=Drive-1
adcd1149-sd: reserve.c:580 Suitable device found=Drive-1
adcd1149-sd: reserve.c:364 dird: CatRe
A quick followup on the mount request mail I just sent...
Using the console I unmounted and remounted that volume, and it still asks for
a mount. Current status is below.
-- Michael
Running Jobs:
JobId Level Name Status
=
I upgraded bacula via cvs to 1.39.23 today, restarted everything fresh, ran
'update slots', and started a job that wants volume FNI0016. It does issue
the autochanger command to load the tape, it does load it and it is in the
drive. bacula knows about it, but it also wants it to be mounted.
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>
> Greetings, and thanks for your help,
>
> I implemented the Max Concurrent Jobs = 20 into the 2 storage
> definitions in the director conf file. I got a different response, so
> that is good.
>
> started over. clean database with the chang
Hi,
On 9/8/2006 7:20 PM, Jake Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup Bacula to use an L9 Autochanger but having
> difficulty figuring out what I'm doing wrong. I have installed mtx and
> can use the L9 no problems. Currently doing ufsdumps for bare metal
> backup/restores so I kno
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 21:49, Wilson, David wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> Recently I began receiving the following error on my director. I have
> not done any upgrades on the clients that hang off of this directory.
> Can anyone tell me if they have seen this and how they fixed it?
Yes.
here's the output of the debug level 100 and at the end of that, is the
output for "status all"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./bacula-dir -d100 -c ../etc/bacula-dir.conf
bacula-dir: dird.c:139 Debug level = 100
bacula-dir: mysql.c:86 db_open first time
bacula-dir: mysql.c:146 mysql_init done
bacula-di
Please see my comment below:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 21:55, Fred Dussault wrote:
> ok
> I've added the Max Concurrent Jobs = 20 into the director config file.
> and got the same result. when I ran the migrate job I got this
>
> OK to run? (yes/mod/no): Unexpected question has been receive
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 21:15, Fred Dussault wrote:
> thanks for the kind words!
>
> Did you see anything blatantly and obviously wrong with my config?
Yes, did you scroll down and look at the rest of what I wrote?
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Congratulations on being the first person to actual
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 21:46, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > I agree that for the Volume Use Duration, the time should not be
> > the End time.
> > Though it is an interesting idea, I'm not convinced the Scheduled
> > time would
> > be correct si
ok
I've added the Max Concurrent Jobs = 20 into the director config file.
and got the same result. when I ran the migrate job I got this
OK to run? (yes/mod/no): Unexpected question has been received.
yes
Job started. JobId=4
13-Sep 15:47 adcd1149-dir: The following 2 JobIds will be migrated: 1,2
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:58, Deric Abel wrote:
> In terms of disaster recovery, if I lost my bacula server along with the
> catalog (or the catalog is backed up but encrypted on a tape) can I
> still restore from an encrypted tape? From your reply I know that I need
> bacula installed to r
Greetings,
Recently I began receiving the following error on my
director. I have not done any upgrades on the clients that hang off of this
directory. Can anyone tell me if they have seen this and how they fixed it?
13-Sep 15:42 bkup1-roc-dir: ERROR in authenticate.c:269 UA
Hello
Fred, his comments were farther down inside the text. He suggested
increasing the max jobs, and incrementing the debug levels. Scroll
down.
On Sep 13, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Fred Dussault wrote:
> thanks for the kind words!
>
> Did you see anything blatantly and obviously wrong with my config?
>
On Sep 13, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I agree that for the Volume Use Duration, the time should not be
> the End time.
> Though it is an interesting idea, I'm not convinced the Scheduled
> time would
> be correct since there can be a big difference between the
> scheduled time a
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:11:30 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 21:00, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:12:18 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> > >
> > > I don't have enough information to respond to this.
> >
> > The code seems to use the start ti
thanks for the kind words!
Did you see anything blatantly and obviously wrong with my config?
> Hello,
>
> Congratulations on being the first person to actually present a
Migration
> problem and for providing lots of nice information ! :-)
>
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:13, Your Name
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 21:00, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:12:18 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> > I don't have enough information to respond to this.
>
> The code seems to use the start time for the comparison with Volume Use
> Duration. Unless the slot is misnam
Hello,
Well so far there are not a lot of opinions in, but they are 100% for #1 --
i.e. make some more beta releases as appropriate and then the production
release in November.
The main reason I'm sending this is to say that if you respond to my original
email on this subject, *please* change
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:41:17 -0700, Jo Rhett said:
>
> > On Monday 11 September 2006 20:21, Jo Rhett wrote:
> >> ANALYSIS: So.. the volume's usage period is being determined not by
> >> when it was first written to, but instead by the start time of the
> >> first job that wrote to it.
> >>
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:12:18 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> I don't have enough information to respond to this.
The code seems to use the start time for the comparison with Volume Use
Duration. Unless the slot is misnamed :-)
I think that is probably the right thing to do, because using th
Hello,
Congratulations on being the first person to actually present a Migration
problem and for providing lots of nice information ! :-)
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:13, Your Name wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a simple setup, I've included my conf files below. here's the
> situation
Hi,
although I'm still using 1.38.5 and never tested 1.39.x I vote for #1.
I know the situation when one makes major changes right before going
on holiday. That's not a very pleasant feeling and it's hard to relax
in this time.
Ralf
--
Greetings,
I have a simple setup, I've included my conf files below. here's the
situation.
I have one client, (the bacula server) one tape drive (exabyte vx-2
external drive, no changer) one tape volume, one "File" volume.
2 backup jobs, one of /home, and one of the catalog.
I can pass all
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I would appreciate your thoughts on this. I especially encourage those of you
> who are already using 1.39.x to speak up.
I vote for #1. And the reason is that our company ar soon about to choose
backup software. And Im sick of Legato. :-)
And also yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My best guess, from personal experience, is that faulty autonegotiation
is to blame. The combination I see arise from this most often is a
machine that is running full duplex and a switch that has autonegotiated
to half. For servers and static ports, I
Hi there,
I'm new to the list and am currently beta testing the 3.39.22 beta
released a few days ago. I think option 1 would be best.
thanks to everyone that puts time and effort into this project.
--
-
Using Tomcat but
In response to Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> 1. Make several more beta releases of 1.39.x before I leave on vacation (i.e.
> between now and roughly 10 October) and hold the official production release
> until mid-November after my return.
>
> 2. Release Bacula 1.39.x in the next
On Thursday 07 September 2006 20:30, Deric Abel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am about to implement data encryption on my backup tapes using the
> Bacula 1.39.18, and I just had one question dealing with restoring that
> encrypted data.
>
> If I were to lose my backup server (but not losing the encryptio
Hello,
There don't seem to be any serious outstanding issues with 1.39.x and the
documentation is "reasonably" complete. You may be aware that
I have been planning to release Bacula version 1.39.x (with an appropriate
version change) to production around now. This would allow approximately 4
Hi AllI'm trying to get Bacula to a point that our operations guy can load tapes reliablyBasically, i've got three pools: Here's the config:#
# System Pools Definitions###
Hi,
I've setup a bacula instance for one of our customers for 20+ clients
but we have a problem. We have a Fedora system that is using 41gb in the
/ directory. When we run an estimate against the system it comes back
with 86gb's. When we try to run the backup it tries to actually backup
this
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 08:31:46AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Perhaps you should tell us why this machine is not on all the time.
This machine is my home server (internet and files), and makes too much
noise to leave running, and takes too much power too.
> Do you have any machines which are po
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 08:08:04AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> I think yes, it can work.
>
> When the box is powered up, Bacula will schedule jobs. Hopefully
> they'll run while the box is still up... The box must remain up
> while all jobs are run.
>
> What problems are you anticipating?
I
Hello,
I'm trying to setup Bacula to use an L9 Autochanger but having
difficulty figuring out what I'm doing wrong. I have installed mtx and
can use the L9 no problems. Currently doing ufsdumps for bare metal
backup/restores so I know that the autochanger is properly setup on the
host syst
Hello,
I am about to implement data encryption on my backup tapes using the
Bacula 1.39.18, and I just had one question dealing with restoring that
encrypted data.
If I were to lose my backup server (but not losing the encryption keys)
because of some disaster, would I have to have all of bacula
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 17:44, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > So, getting back to my original question:
> >
> > Is there a definitive solution (and "upgrade to version X.Y.Z" is a
> > fine
answer)
> > to the problem where backups fail becaus
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 17:20, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> Enter autochanger drive[0]: 1
> >>
> >> Connecting to Storage daemon MSL6000-changer at
msslay.mssl.ucl.ac.uk:9103
>
> >> 3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded dr
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, getting back to my original question:
>
> Is there a definitive solution (and "upgrade to version X.Y.Z" is a
> fine answer)
> to the problem where backups fail because Bacula wants to use a volume
> in on tape drive when the vo
In the message dated: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:33:59 +0200,
The pithy ruminations from Kern Sibbald on
were:
=> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 11:30, Alan Brown wrote:
=> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
=> >
=> > > On Tuesday 12 September 2006 18:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=> > >> I'm
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Enter autochanger drive[0]: 1
>>
>> Connecting to Storage daemon MSL6000-changer at msslay.mssl.ucl.ac.uk:9103
>> 3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded drive 0" command.
>>
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 17:11, Scott Simpson wrote:
> Bacula CVS 2006-09-11 built from source
>
> I'm writing to a DVD. This works fine on the first DVD I write but when it
> fills up and I put the second DVD in and type "label" to bconsole, the
> storage daemon just sits there. When I do
In response to "Keith Phipps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Now it may be that I just don't understand the steps of this software,
> I've attempted the chapter "A Brief Tutorial" in the manual but since
> this is a live environment and I don't have a test environment to hack
> around in, I'm worried
Bacula CVS 2006-09-11 built from source
I'm writing to a DVD. This works fine on the first DVD I write but when it
fills up and I put the second DVD in and type "label" to bconsole, the
storage daemon just sits there. When I do a "status" on the storage daemon I
get
Device "DVDStorage" (/dev/h
Good Day,
As I left the group yesterday, I"d sent in a few conf files and a list
of volumes. The responses I got yesterday were helpful in sheding some
light on this program. I made some progress this morning, actually
got an incremental backup done. I went to the data center, umounted
and ejecte
Thanks for the education. I knew about /proc, but /sys is news to me.
Again, many thanks.
Don.
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 10:49 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 06:09, MacArthur, Don wrote:
> > Hi to all!
> >
> > I took the advice about loading a minimal OS config and t
I don't have enough information to respond to this.
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 02:41, Jo Rhett wrote:
>
> > On Monday 11 September 2006 20:21, Jo Rhett wrote:
> >> ANALYSIS: So.. the volume's usage period is being determined not by
> >> when it was first written to, but instead by the start t
Gabriele Bulfon said:
> How do I know if it is half-duplex or full-duplex?
This link might help you:
http://www.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/summaries/2003-December/004745.html
Ralf
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to
Hi Gabriele,
i don't think that you'll need to check if it's half-duplex
or not, it seems to be definitly
half-duplex on one side (sun i think). so best would be to
google for eri0 duplex to find
out how to set it to full-duplex. how to set the
switch depends on the switch you are
using.
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 11:30, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 12 September 2006 18:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I'm running into a frequent situation where Bacula wants a given volume
to
> > be
> >> in one drive of our autochanger, and it
How do I know if it is half-duplex or full-duplex?
Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l.
Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - Fax +39 028243880
Via Felice Cavallotti 16 - 20089, Rozzano - Milano - ITALY
http://www.sonicle.com
Da: MaxxAtWork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>A: Gabriele Bulfon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/13/06, Gabriele Bulfon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I also found this on the FD client machine:Name Mtu Net/Dest Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Collis Queue
lo0 8232 loopback localhost 17627 0 17627 0 0 0
eri0 1500 ALTEA
We have a 2.6 Kernel and running RHEL 4, we installed the sg3 utils, ran the
modprobe sg and everything, but there is no sg under /dev. If I run the
hardware browser I can see the PV-124T as /dev/sg3 and the LTO device as
/dev/sg2, the backplane as /dev/sg0 and the scsi adapter as /dev/sg1 but l
I thing you are using the wrong module. You are using aic79xx and I
think you should use aic7xxx.
Jaime Ventura
[Infra-estruturas e Comunicações]
Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431
4200 - 072 Porto
Telef: +351 22 834 05 00 (04) - ext. 1641
Fax: +351 22 832 11 59
e-mail: [
...I also found this on the FD client machine:Name Mtu Net/Dest Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Collis Queue lo0 8232 loopback localhost 17627 0 17627 0 0 0 eri0 1500 ALTEA ALTEA 39578122 1190 47614287 605397 1343684 0.
Did RHEL correctly detected you scsi board or did you changed the
/etc/modprobe.conf?
Which kernel version are you using?
Jaime Ventura
[Infra-estruturas e Comunicações]
Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431
4200 - 072 Porto
Telef: +351 22 834 05 00 (04) - ext. 1641
Fax: +351 22 832
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 September 2006 18:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'm running into a frequent situation where Bacula wants a given volume to
> be
>> in one drive of our autochanger, and it doesn't seem to find the volume when
>> it's already in the other dr
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Michael Brennen wrote:
>> I'm running into a frequent situation where Bacula wants a given volume to be
>> in one drive of our autochanger, and it doesn't seem to find the volume when
>> it's already in the other drive.
> I have seen the same thing and posted to that effect l
I did a snoop on the SD and FD machines, and found that all traffic is going directly from the FD client to the SD server. So, no double path to the director and back to SD.What can make the traffic run so slow between them?
Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l.
Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - F
...I seem to be unluckyevery time I found a workaroundsomething is against me againNow I have :- The Sun280R being the SD and the FD for backing up itself- a Solaris x86 3Ghz being the Director and the Postgres- a Solaris 8 SPARC being an FD- a Windows machine being an FDThen I run te
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 06:09, MacArthur, Don wrote:
> Hi to all!
>
> I took the advice about loading a minimal OS config and then restoring from
backup. I have another issue that may or may not be related to the
restore...
>
> I used "restore all" from the console, with files being rep
I am sorry to insist, but perhaps somebody can help me. Today, the job
of last night was not launch again.
Above you can see a piece of bacula's status :
Running Jobs:
Writing: Full Backup job NightlySave_part1 JobId=270 Volume=""
pool="WeeklyPool" device=""LTO-2" (/dev/nst0)"
Files=327,2
71 matches
Mail list logo
