Keba wrote:
> I hereby intend to become a Player.
>
> [Why do I join? Well, it‘s Zaraday!]
I am so sorry to write my first two mails to the wrong mailing list. I
hope your first impression of "Keba" is not that bad then...
--
Keba
Am Freitag, den 13.08.2010, 00:00 -0500 schrieb Aaron Goldfein:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 20:28, Keba wrote:
>
> --
> Keba
>
>
> If you don't mind me asking, who are you? Have you played Agora before
> (you awarded yours
ATC.
I nominate myself as ATC, too.
--
Keba
Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
>
> >> Proposal: Low altitude
> >> (AI = 1, II = 0, distributable by fee)
> >>
> >> Keba is a co-author of this proposal, unless e announces within a
> >> week after the publication of this proposal that e is
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:36, Keba wrote:
> Proposal: "Win by Respect" (AI=1, II=0, distributable)
>
> {{{
> Amend Rule 2287 "Props" by replacing:
>
>A player
line
wrong mailing list.
--
Keba
gt; -coppro
I assume it would be better to put this into the Rules?
--
Keba
or another office
(maybe the Herald?)?
[1] http://zenith.homelinux.net/website_submission/
[2]
ftp://ftp.cse.unsw.edu.au/pub/users/malcolmr/nomic/articles/agora-theses/library.html
--
Keba
09-November/007387.html
>
> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-November/008338.html
>
> as well as one (Andre's) that was not awarded a degree.
Oh, thank you :)
--
Keba
Keba wrote:
> Proposal: "We live in hard times" (AI=3, II=1, undistributable)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 2125 by adding this text to the last paragraph:
>
> Violation of a Rule is a Class-2-Crime.
>
> [2 additional Rests for each Crime, because players sho
4 support and by
paying 4 ergs?
--
Keba
d of an Urgent Proposal is five days from the
>time the Proposal is distributed.
>
>
> -G.
Hm, that sounds nice, but need to be rewritten. "Class 1 Infraction"
should be Class-1-Crime and Rule 107 states: "Rules to the contrary
notwithstanding, the voting period for a decision with at least two
options cannot be shorter than seven days".
--
Keba
re) distributable Urgent Proposals in the Proposal
pool." What’s a good value for N? Maybe 3?
I assume it’s important to put the limit into another Proposal, so both
are more likely to pass.
--
Keba
tly
states so.
Maybe "a power of 3" should be "a power higher or equal than the power
of this Rule".
--
Keba
al power. The voting advantage in your portosal is - in my opinion
- much too high.
This leads to another question: Does "Win by Clout" really need to be
repealed?
--
Keba
ry exploit I could
(15:10:27) Wooble: yes, also to keep your from exploiting it. :P
(15:10:31) Wooble: you*
(I assume quoting public fora should be legitim, even without asking?)
--
Keba
Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 04:58 PM, Keba wrote:
> > (I assume quoting public fora should be legitim, even without asking?)
> It's a discussion forum.
Oh, discussion fora are not public fora? Nice to know :)
--
Keba
Oh my god, the mail looks terrible, I'm sorry. Switched to an email
client, should be better in the future ;)
--
Keba
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> AGAINST (bad collision with relisting)
> AGAINST (collision)
> AGAINST (collision)
I see your point, but if the possible collision is the only reason for
voting against, I recommend to vote conditionally.
--
Keba
fee-based action (except destroying ergs) can be
performed for a charge of one erg, objections and supports can be
"bought" for a low fee etc.]
}}}
Of course I have lots of ideas related to the PM like a Ribbon for the
Power Spender, other rewards for using the PM or more bot-PM acts, but I
assume they should be proposed later.
--
Keba
Tanner L. Swett
Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine and should be ok
as a name and I chose the name Lab Labour because it sounds nice (yeah,
I know the lab of Laboratory is pronounced differently than the lab of
labour...), but Laboratory Worker is more correct of course. Well, maybe
I'll change that name to Lab Worker.
--
Keba
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
> > The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player.
>
> Has an actual fix for The Robot scam been proposed yet? If so
> I like this, if not... -G.
Well, it's not clear whether the scam has wor
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend to vote against any proposal that includes an act-on-behalf
> mechanism of any kind.
Oh, why? Just because of bad experiences of the past?
--
Keba
com...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 25, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine
>
> Perpetuum actually, though I like Lab Labour
Oh, you're right. Well, you should never look up a word and u
You know that the attempt to rename the City, omd's objection to this
attempt, the CoE and the NoV were all sent to the discussion mailing
list and have therefore no effect?
--
Keba
I assume my email client has made a mistake, this message should just be
ignored.
--
Keba
(or
any other Courtier)? I don't know whether the voting limits are
increased by re-naming, but at least the special duties and powers
should apply, if coppro's (or the Robot's?) scam worked.
Maybe many players vote for this Proposal, because they intend to change
their names at the beginning of next week?
--
Keba
props and coppro 16.
--
the real ATC Keba
Sean Hunt wrote:
> I set this Case's II to 1.
> I intend, without 3 objections, to set this Case's II to 2.
> I intend, without 2 objections, to set this Case's II to 3.
NTTPF.
The latter intend fails, as you may only increase or decrease a Case's
II by one.
--
Keba
Warrigal wrote:
> > 6818 G 1 3.0 KebaUrgent Limit
> AGAINST; urgent proposals are already limited by the fact that
> distributing them costs three ergs.
Well, the proposal did not intend to restrict the Urgent Limit of one
player, that's done by ergs and one p
Keba wrote:
> I intend without objection to clean Rule 2283 "Fees" by replacing
>
> An attempt to performed a fee-based action is also implicitly a
> claim to be in possession of sufficient ergs
>
> with
>
> An attempt to perform a fee
gt; possible." Thus, people don't have to avoid ambiguous things like
> "bilge-pump" in their proposals; they can just include them and it
> will be good enough.
Or we define a word as everything between two whitespaces except
whitespecaes.
Feel free to propose your fix ;)
--
Keba
Warrigal wrote:
> > 6824 G 1 3.5 KebaRights are important
> AGAINST. Setting a rule's power greater than 3 is dangerous, as it
> ends up taking precedence over rules that are supposed to be
> omnipotent.
Shouldn't rights take precedence over *all* other
to the elite, and
> allowing players to accumulate power that cannot easily be taken from
> them. We're looking for up to three other people to join. Who's
> interested?
>
> —Co-Founder Tanner L. Swett
I would like to join, as I like team play.
--
Keba
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> I vote for Keba.
Thanks, seems I could have taken the office, if I showed more interest
for it.
But the voting period had ended about a quarter hour before you
submitted your vote, so it's invalid.
--
Keba
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Denied. The Promotor CAN distribute a proposal at any time, and it's
> no longer ILLEGAL to do so during the week it was made Distributable.
Hm, you're right. I'm sorry.
> 6833 G 1 1.0 KebaLeet Leadership
FOR
--
Keba
ad make it so that they don't
> > automatically go back to erg form at the start of a week, but rather
> > have to be transformed by the player.
>
> Yes, I think this would work really well. Just make it so that
> capacitors persist from week to week and have to be converted
>
on)
This has the same effect (for you) as rebelling, but is much safer.
--
Keba
me K.S
Supervisor for helping me out here, but you declined indirectly.
As G has retract eir offer, I retract my offer as well. I forgot about
FSCN, of course it's members could and should take advantage of this
"scam". Additionally, bribes of one prop are also not bad, if you want
to jump up, of course ;)
--
Keba
one or two
Leadership Tokens. Sounds as a nice deal.
--
Keba
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Keba wrote:
> > If any player starts today or tomorrow two coups at once (and no coup
> > other than mine was initiated), I promise to destroy the thereby
> > eventually gained rests (max. 4) within two weeks.
> >
>
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 08:41 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Keba wrote:
> > Thu 02 Sep 19:56 G. DU In case of emergency
> > Sun 05 Sep 14:07 G. D Coup Bug Fix
> > Sun 05 Sep 14:11 G. D Reward Urgency
> >
>
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 09:00 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Keba wrote:
> >> I intend without two objections, to flip the Distributability of my
> >> proposal entitled "Perpetuum mobile" to distributable.
Keba wrote:
> > URGENT PROPOSAL
> > title: Demarcation
> > chamber: Purple
> > ai: 2.0
> > interest: 1
> > proposer: omd
> > submit_date: 2010-09-04
> > submit_mid:
> > distributability: undistributable
> > distributability flipped: 20
Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Hm, I like the weekly destroying of ergs and capacitors, because I like
> > the way the current economy works, so I am against a manual destroying.
>
> Well, one of our stated purposes is to allow players
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 16:20 -0400 schrieb omd:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Proposal "White Renaissance" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
> > {{{
> > Amend Rule 2199 "Ribbons" by removing:
> >
> >(excep
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 17:06 -0400 schrieb omd:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> >> Why were White Ribbons removed in the first place?
> >
> > See CfJ 2836. White Ribbons only exist because of that phrase, if this
> > phrase is deleted, all whi
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 17:06 -0400 schrieb omd:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> >> Why were White Ribbons removed in the first place?
> >
> > See CfJ 2836. White Ribbons only exist because of that phrase, if this
> > phrase is deleted, all whi
ay only use 50% or
"X*ergs-they-spent" of the ergs, or what ever protection you like).
As I invented the PM, I would like the PM (or another second-class
player) to be said entity, but this is not necessary.
I am against doing nothing and saving money in the mean time.
Additionally, I am not sure whether "For each capacitor . . . its former
owner." is clear enough.
--
Keba
Am Mittwoch, den 08.09.2010, 14:46 -0700 schrieb Kerim Aydin:
>
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Keba wrote:
> > Keba wrote:
> > > I Bestow Favors:
> > >
> > > 1. Tanner L. Swett
> > > 2. Tiger
> > > 3. ais523
> > > 4. Wo
um amount possible and charged
the appropriate partial fee."
So I (the assumed PSM) assume moving Tiger down one position has worked.
--
Keba
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Keba wrote:
>
> > Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> >> I resign as Promotor.
> >
> > I transfer a prop from Wooble (because problems are not solved by
> > resigning) to Andon (because e will not be listed in the ATC's report
> > separate
up in 14 days ;)
--
Keba
ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 23:27 +0200, Keba wrote:
> > I intend without objection to clean Rule 2303 "Teams" by replacing:
> >
> > a unique
> >
> > with:
> >
> > an unique
>
> I object. In m
Thu 09 Sep 03:00 omd S (for a charge of 5 ergs)
You own one erg.
--
Keba
> > Murphy, ais523, Taral, the next office-holder that replies to this
> > email with "AOL!".
>
> What, no preferences, really?
>
I don't care about the website.
--
Keba
Am Sonntag, den 12.09.2010, 20:22 -0400 schrieb Sean Hunt:
> I make myself the Pariah.
Hm, if I'm right you gained 23 rests for doing so (if making yourself
the Pariah means assuming the Pariah), because you were the Pariah for a
few hours? Was this intended?
--
Keba
Keba wrote:
> Twice. Tanner L. Swett has now 1 erg left.
Well, no. Tanner L. Swett does not possess any ergs anymore. Sorry.
--
Keba
omd wrote:
> If the initial NoV was invalid and if this is possible, I pay a fee to
> publish a NoV identical to the above, contest it, and initiate a
> criminal case on it.
Fails, you do not possess any ergs.
--
PSM Keba
Ed Murphy wrpte:
> omd wrote:
>
> > As many times as possible, I pay a fee to destroy an erg in The
> > Pariah's possession.
>
> H. PSM Keba, how many times did this work? (I need to update rest
> counts in the Assessor DB to determine whose votes are nullifi
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Keba wrote:
>
> > Keba wrote:
> >> Twice. Tanner L. Swett has now 1 erg left.
> >
> > Well, no. Tanner L. Swett does not possess any ergs anymore. Sorry.
>
> The quoted message containing "Twice" hasn't come through (p
Warrigal wrote:
> If possible, I award myself a farad for the above judgement.
You gained a farad for judging, so you may gain a capacitor for this
farad.
--
Keba
Am Dienstag, den 14.09.2010, 12:54 +0200 schrieb Keba:
> Warrigal wrote:
> > If possible, I award myself a farad for the above judgement.
>
> You gained a farad for judging, so you may gain a capacitor for this
> farad.
>
Oh sorry, you didn't gain a farad, because this CFJ's II is 0.
--
Keba
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Keba wrote:
> > [Generally, this could be done by the CotC very well, but both the CotC
> > and the Herald got to do too many jobs, so we are ready for a new
> > office.]
>
> I agree, but let me offer a puzzle. Refactor the
Am Mittwoch, den 15.09.2010, 17:01 -0700 schrieb Kerim Aydin:
>
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Keba wrote:
> > Additionally, I don't understand why G. do not want to post eir Rest
> > record, if e already collected information on it.
>
> Without rancor, I'm explori
Am Donnerstag, den 16.09.2010, 20:07 -0400 schrieb comex:
> Proposal: individualism (AI=2, II=0, Distributable)
>
> Repeal Rule 2303 (Teams), Rule 2304 (The Referee), Rule 2305 (Fans),
> and Rule 2306 (Team Tactics).
II=0?
--
Keba
Am Sonntag, den 12.09.2010, 22:16 +0200 schrieb Keba:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > 6837 0 1.0 KebaLeet fix
>
> CoE: I have withdrawn this Proposal on or about 05/09/2010 10:58:09 (and
> submitted a similar proposal entitled "Leet fix fix"), so this prop
do so without a
PSM's report)
> Also, I intend with 2 Senate support to begin an Emergency Session, as
> we've been successfully invaded from Blognomic.
An invasion consisting of one player? (Or miss I someone?) Did I do
anything wrong to deal me out?
--
Keba
Am Freitag, den 17.09.2010, 10:13 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Keba wrote:
> > An invasion consisting of one player? (Or miss I someone?) Did I do
> > anything wrong to deal me out?
>
> One player? Blognomic's Riddler took dir
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> and I doubt enough people would be interested anyway.
>
> I intend, with notice and with 3 support, to cause Space Alert to
> cease to be a contest.
>
> Sorry for the bother.
>
I support. (I planned to do so as well anyway)
--
Keba
u could have award yourself only
one capacitor.
The intent to increase the II without objections does not automatically
increase it after four days, you have to do that manually. (see Rule
1728)
--
Keba
Am Montag, den 20.09.2010, 01:10 +0200 schrieb Keba:
> Am Sonntag, den 19.09.2010, 15:48 -0700 schrieb Taral:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Taral wrote:
> > > The question on culpability in CFJ 2860 is judged NOT GUILTY by 1504(d).
> >
> > I award myself 2
ave one erg left.
--
PSM Keba
Warrigal wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I pay a fee to initiate an election for Pariah.
>
> If possible, I nominate myself.
>
> —Tanner L. Swett
You are already nominated, because you are the current holder of that
office.
--
Keba
omd worte:
> This needs to be a CoE.
Hm, which error should I claim? I'm relatively sure e believed e had
that amount of ergs and rests. And doing something as many times as
possible is not an error of course.
--
Keba
, the reports
were not *that* important, second they will be published only one day to
late and third, it wasn't my fault really.
If there anyone is for a penalty, I have to say I lost many ergs, that
*is* some kind of penalty.
--
Keba
76 matches
Mail list logo