Ed Murphy wrote: > coppro wrote: > > >> Proposal: Low altitude > >> (AI = 1, II = 0, distributable by fee) > >> > >> Keba is a co-author of this proposal, unless e announces within a > >> week after the publication of this proposal that e is not. > >> > >> Amend Rule 2287 (Props) by replacing this text: > >> > >> The Air Traffic Controller is an office and the recordkeepor of > >> props. > >> > >> with this text: > >> > >> The Air Traffic Controller is an office and the recordkeepor of > >> props; prop records are part of eir monthly report. > > > > a) The proposal just makes them part of the weekly and monthly reports. > > Not so. Rule 2166 (Assets) just says "[The recordkeepor]'s report > includes...". Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) says > > Any information defined by the rules as part of an office's > report, without specifying which one, is part of its weekly > report. > > but the proposal would prevent this from being triggered.
I agree here and will vote for the proposal. > > b) You can't have future-conditional actions like that. > > You're right, Rule 106 specifies "unambiguously ... when it was > submitted". Yes, but I am ok with the co-author status. :) -- Keba
