On 4/11/23 15:44, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2)
Ah interesting. My guess is that when you schedule the client sets the
Date to the scheduled time, even if it doesn't actually *send* at the
scheduled time. That
I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2)
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:40 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
> The
On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
The time between your DATE and the first received on these messages
seems longer than your previous messages (or other players'). Did you
schedule these, or do something to the head
I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:12 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 13:54 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Your client itself will normally display the timestamp attached by the
> > sending machine. This is usually assumed to be honest, but could
> > actually be
On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 13:54 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> Your client itself will normally display the timestamp attached by the
> sending machine. This is usually assumed to be honest, but could
> actually be forged (to amusing results, such as pushing a new email way
> back in your
On 4/11/23 13:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
How bad would it be to send several emails in a short period of time with
the hope that one of them has the best timing?
Oh also, depending on what client you're using, you can schedule emails.
That's probably a better bet than doing
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:59 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> How bad would it be to send several emails in a short period of time with
> the hope that one of them has the best timing?
I think it's logical to try, but if it's a necessary strategy it
points to problem with the ga
On 4/11/23 13:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
How bad would it be to send several emails in a short period of time with
the hope that one of them has the best timing?
Unless you were sending from entirely different networks, you would not
see different timings generally.
I thi
How bad would it be to send several emails in a short period of time with
the hope that one of them has the best timing?
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 8:55 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/11/23 13:46, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Is the t
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:47 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Is the timestamp of the mailing list itself the one that appears on the
> archive website?
Yes for private archives, though with a UTC conversion.
There's been some tension on this over Agora's history. The timestam
On 4/11/23 13:46, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
Is the timestamp of the mailing list itself the one that appears on the
archive website?
So if you download an email and open it in plaintext, or click "view
headers" or "view source" on your client, you will see a ton of metadata
Is the timestamp of the mailing list itself the one that appears on the
archive website?
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 8:45 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/11/23 13:34, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > How do you determine which action was ma
On 4/11/23 13:34, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
How do you determine which action was made first on a certain Agoran day
when multiple competing actions try to be the first message sent on that
day?
Emails are time-stamped by each device that touches them, generally
speaking the
On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 20:34 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> How do you determine which action was made first on a certain Agoran day
> when multiple competing actions try to be the first message sent on that
> day?
Emails have timestamps in their email headers, added by the v
Oh, I meant when different competing players try to be the first person to
send a message on a certain Agoran day.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 8:42 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/11/23 14:34, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> > How do
On 4/11/23 14:34, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> How do you determine which action was made first on a certain Agoran day
> when multiple competing actions try to be the first message sent on that
> day?
Per R478/41:
> Any action performed by sending a message is performed
I'll word it next time so that past pledges count too
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 8:35 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/11/23 11:55, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> > I change my vote on 8947 to {AGAINST, but FOR instead if its author
> pled
On 4/3/23 15:44, Janet Cobb wrote:
> On 4/3/23 15:31, nix via agora-business wrote:
>> On 4/1/23 23:38, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>>> As such, I petition the Herald to award G. the patent title of "Stares
>>> Decisively". (Name selected on Discord.)
>> I intend to, with 2 Agoran Consent,
How do you determine which action was made first on a certain Agoran day
when multiple competing actions try to be the first message sent on that
day?
I was thinking it could be DM-less gameplay with an external DM only
interfering when called.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 7:19 PM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion [2023-04-11 18:20]:
> > Oh, I meant roleplay combat as mainly a
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:07 AM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> What do you think? The language could be better, sure, but I mean the
> mechanics. Also: can't figure out a good and fun way to allow Golem
> creation.
>
> {
>
> The Xaman is an office.
>
> Golems
Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion [2023-04-11 18:20]:
> Oh, I meant roleplay combat as mainly a narrative exercise rather than
> mathematical. Although I suppose that it could just be simplified into just
> mechanics and maths which is fine with me too, I like those games as well.
> I just thou
Oh, I meant roleplay combat as mainly a narrative exercise rather than
mathematical. Although I suppose that it could just be simplified into just
mechanics and maths which is fine with me too, I like those games as well.
I just thought it could be interesting to have, in contrast to the highly
mec
Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion [2023-04-11 15:11]:
> I believe that this is already possible through contracts
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM juan via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > What do you think? The language could be better, sure, but I mean t
I didn't notice that and will use conditionals to avoid situations like this
On Tuesday, April 11, 2023, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/11/23 09:27, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> >> 8949* Janet 3.0 Might as wel
On 4/11/23 10:22, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I don't see it that way. There are plenty of nomics that have played for
extended periods of time with no payment for being the author of a proposal.
We don't have to play the same way other nomics do.
Gamifying Proposal-passing l
On 4/11/23 09:27, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
>> 8949* Janet 3.0 Might as well ask?
> AGAINST
>
If this is AGAINST on the merits, fine, but I have already pledged not
to take a radiance award from this.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
I don't see it that way. There are plenty of nomics that have played for
extended periods of time with no payment for being the author of a proposal.
Gamifying Proposal-passing like that gamifies both Proposal-making and
Proposal-voting. This is especially the case with Radiance where having one
p
On 4/11/23 10:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
But yeah, I see that all these things aren't really "newbie" friendly.
Gerontocracy is a hot topic that gets brought up... probably quarterly?
Could be wrong, but I don't think this is really a gerontocratic issue
but more an ongoing-game
On 4/11/23 09:41, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
But yeah, I see that all these things aren't really "newbie" friendly.
Gerontocracy is a hot topic that gets brought up... probably quarterly?
It's true that CFJs and Proposals and Offices have a learning curve (tho
most people are wil
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 7:41 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> I think it is good to reward proposals. Proposals are the primary gameplay
> of ANY nomic, so I don't have any trouble with rewards. But I do see what
> you mean about how it is imbalanced: you could work hard on a proposa
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:07 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I didn't realize the radiance thing. Oh dear.
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 2:42 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 11,
On 4/11/23 08:27, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
All of the Proposals sort of have the invisible extra rider of "And also
give 4 Radiance to this Proposal's author", and while I may normally agree
with a couple of these Proposals, I'm not as convinced when each of them
has that added.
I believe that this is already possible through contracts
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> What do you think? The language could be better, sure, but I mean the
> mechanics. Also: can't figure out a good and fun way to allow Gol
I didn't realize the radiance thing. Oh dear.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 2:42 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 4:55 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > This probably adds
What do you think? The language could be better, sure, but I mean the
mechanics. Also: can't figure out a good and fun way to allow Golem
creation.
{
The Xaman is an office.
Golems are entities tracked by the Xaman. Mind is a Golem text switch
defaulting to "False" tracked by the Xaman. Body is
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 4:55 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This probably adds an incentive to AGAINST everything from specific people
> who are about to win with crystals. Or AGAINST in general, I suppose.
> ...
Overall, radiance makes it so
This probably adds an incentive to AGAINST everything from specific people
who are about to win with crystals. Or AGAINST in general, I suppose.
On Tuesday, April 11, 2023, Forest Sweeney via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This has been fluctuating from serious to non-se
I would also like to be judge
On Monday, April 10, 2023, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:36 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Hm, I thought I already asked this, but I'd like to become "interested"
> as
> >
41 matches
Mail list logo
