Archived at https://github.com/AgoraNomic/Reportor/tree/master/weekly_summaries
Report for the week of 2020-06-08..14:
# Summary
nch's long-awaited Sets economy was adopted this week, and we've already
seen three contracts for moving Cards and Products around (one of which
has been revealed to
never mind, cant read. rest of argument still stands on ordinary meaning of
attempt in a criminal context. new common sense arguments: rules tend to
think intending anything you want is okay and criminalizing formal intent
is bad, see the No Faking rule (exempting intent)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1
On 6/18/2020 8:02 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> Merely thinking and planning to commit murder isn't attempted murder, the
> acts carried out have to be "more than merely preparatory" (under English
> law). The same applies to this analogous crime, merely preparing to take
> the ossify
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 03:32, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/18/20 11:29 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> > What would the text look like then? (I don't follow how the "invoke"
> > phrasing relates to the requirement about specifying zero fee.)
>
>
> I would phrase it as
On 6/18/20 11:29 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> What would the text look like then? (I don't follow how the "invoke"
> phrasing relates to the requirement about specifying zero fee.)
I would phrase it as "If a fee-based method to perform an action has a
fee of no assets, that action
> >> If the Rules define a fee-based mechanism to perform an action, but the
> >> specified set of assets is the empty set, then the mechanism can be
> >> invoked by announcement, but the announcement must include that there is
> >> an (empty or 0) fee for the mechanism.
> > I'm not sure if the mea
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 20:37, ATMunn via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Here's a proto-proposal I came up with somewhat on the spot. Opinions
> welcome.
>
>
> Title: The Deck
> AI: 1.0
> Author: ATMunn
> Co-author(s):
>
> Enact a power-1 rule entitled "The Deck" with the following text:
> The D
On 6/18/20 11:08 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> If the Rules associate payment of a set of actions (hereafter the fee
> s/actions/assets/
Thanks, fixed on local copy.
>
>> for the action; syns: cost, price charge) with performing an action,
> You lost a comma after "price".
Fix
> If the Rules associate payment of a set of actions (hereafter the fee
s/actions/assets/
> for the action; syns: cost, price charge) with performing an action,
You lost a comma after "price".
> that mechanism for performing that action is a fee-based mechanism.
Shouldn't it be "method" rather
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:52 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> CFJ: R. Lee attempted to perform a forbidden action in the message in
> evidence.
>
> Barred: R. Lee
>
> Arguments:
>
> In reference to:
> Attempting a forbidden action is PROHIBITED,
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 02:54, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/18/20 10:47 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I don't have a strong preference but just directly winning does seem
> > simpler.
> >
> > Either way I think R2579 should be clarified so it's clear that a
> > fe
Here it is: https://agoranomic.org/Webmastor/
Will surely receive tweaks over time.
--
nch
Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager
On 6/18/20 10:47 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> I don't have a strong preference but just directly winning does seem simpler.
>
> Either way I think R2579 should be clarified so it's clear that a
> fee-based win method doesn't make all other win methods also require
> that fee.
>
> I
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 17:36, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Minor discussion topic here.
>
> Right now, as evidenced by recent CFJ, the rules are in a slightly weird
> place in winning where sometimes you do a thing (Raise a Banner) that
> causes you to win, and sometimes what you do i
Lol, I just amended the forbidden arts rule to allow me to do this, so nice
try. It would require me to actually do the action (or attempt it) which I
can't do due to the objection.
I didn't have any overarching objective with this message lol it was mainly
a Beaker joke.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at
On 6/18/20 8:50 PM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to amed the rules in the following
> inconsequential way:
> Amend every word in the ruleset except the rules at power 4 to read "Meep"
>
> --
> From R. Lee
I don't think words can read.
--
nch
Prime Minister, W
G. wrote:
As a side-note, could we add back to Sets a single-word term that means
trading cards for currencies? The first draft used "transmute" but that's
being used in a proposal now. It would be much easier to say "when a card
is transmuted..." so it's only triggered when that particular ki
On 6/18/20 8:39 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> Meh, I don't see any difference between cleaning platonic typos and
> Rulekeepor typos. Remove them all without mercy!!
Platonic typos need an actual cleaning to solve, while Rulekeepor typos
can just be fixed once they're noticed.
--
Ja
Meh, I don't see any difference between cleaning platonic typos and
Rulekeepor typos. Remove them all without mercy!!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 6:11 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/18/20 4:06 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend to cl
On 6/18/2020 7:05 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
Oh - forgot a couple comments!
On 6/18/2020 1:37 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
Enact a power-1 rule entitled "Discarding" with the following text:
When a player pays a set of at least 2 cards,
You need to add some
On 6/18/2020 6:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/18/2020 1:37 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
exactly proportional to the number of that Card
When we had a card game with a deck once, we had a lot of minor errors
happen where a card was thought to be in the deck tha
On 6/18/20 4:21 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/18/20 2:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 6/18/20 2:56 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Here's my first draft of regulations for management of the github.
>>> Feedback appreciated.
>>>
>>> {
Oh - forgot a couple comments!
On 6/18/2020 1:37 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> Enact a power-1 rule entitled "Discarding" with the following text:
> When a player pays a set of at least 2 cards,
You need to add something here - "pay" on its own could count paying
someone else,
On 6/18/2020 1:37 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> exactly proportional to the number of that Card
When we had a card game with a deck once, we had a lot of minor errors
happen where a card was thought to be in the deck that wasn't, or vice
versa. This led to a lot of breakages of rule
The links to the official historical reports are now on the Assessor web
archive. Example at [0].
Happy archive searching, everyone!
[0]: https://agoranomic.org/assessor/8431-8441.txt
--
Jason Cobb
On 6/18/20 5:15 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> I transferred DracoLotto my victory card at [0], which is reflected in
> the history but not in the totals.
>
> [0]:
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-June/043331.html
Gah, I keep sending emails too early; sorry fo
On 6/18/20 5:08 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> I know, I know. I've already done this this week. I think this fixes all
> the issues brought up with previous revisions. I also did some custom
> styling on the markdown/HTML version. I think it looks really nice.
>
> Anyway, critic
I know, I know. I've already done this this week. I think this fixes all
the issues brought up with previous revisions. I also did some custom
styling on the markdown/HTML version. I think it looks really nice.
Anyway, criticize away.
FRESH TEXT VERSION:
https://agoranomic.org/Treasuror/report
On 6/18/20 3:45 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> And sorry for bugging you so much about this. I spend a lot of time on
> Github projects for Agora so I just want to make sure that all the
> regulations allow me to keep on doing that effectively.
Please bug away. The whole reason fo
On 2020-06-18 14:12, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/18/20 2:22 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
Unless I'm misunderstanding this list and all factors are weighted
equally, in which case that should be stated somewhere.
I didn't intend for the list to be meaningfully ordered,
Here's a proto-proposal I came up with somewhat on the spot. Opinions
welcome.
Title: The Deck
AI: 1.0
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s):
Enact a power-1 rule entitled "The Deck" with the following text:
The Deck is an entity. The Deck CAN own Cards, but no other types of
assets.
On 6/18/2020 4:21 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On 6/18/20 2:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
wrote:
On 6/18/20 2:56 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
Here's my first draft of regulations for management of the github.
Feedback appreciated.
{
# Github Owners
On 6/18/20 2:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/18/20 2:56 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Here's my first draft of regulations for management of the github.
>> Feedback appreciated.
>>
>> {
>>
>> # Github Owners
>>
>> A Github Owner is a person who is
On 6/18/20 2:22 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2020-06-18 12:56, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Here's my first draft of regulations for management of the github.
>> Feedback appreciated.
>>
>> {
>>
>> # Github Owners
>>
>> A Github Owner is a person who is listed as an owne
On 6/18/20 4:06 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
> I intend to clean Rule 2576 "Ownership" without objection, replacing
> "Department.." with "Department." [first sentence of the second paragraph]
>
I can confirm that the platonic ruleset does have the double period
(unlike some previous atte
On 2020-06-18 12:56, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
Here's my first draft of regulations for management of the github.
Feedback appreciated.
{
# Github Owners
A Github Owner is a person who is listed as an owner of the Agora
organization on Github. There should be 3 Github Owners at any time.
On 6/18/20 2:56 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> Here's my first draft of regulations for management of the github.
> Feedback appreciated.
>
> {
>
> # Github Owners
>
> A Github Owner is a person who is listed as an owner of the Agora
> organization on Github. There should be 3 Github Own
Here's my first draft of regulations for management of the github.
Feedback appreciated.
{
# Github Owners
A Github Owner is a person who is listed as an owner of the Agora
organization on Github. There should be 3 Github Owners at any time.
The Ideal Criteria for a Github Owner are as follows
I think I personally prefer the more direct option, but I don't really
have a good reason why. It just seems more intuitive, I guess. I would
still be fine with either.
On 6/18/2020 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
Minor discussion topic here.
Right now, as evidenced by re
Minor discussion topic here.
Right now, as evidenced by recent CFJ, the rules are in a slightly weird
place in winning where sometimes you do a thing (Raise a Banner) that
causes you to win, and sometimes what you do is "win by announcement" if
certain conditions are met. These can break in dif
On 6/17/20 8:11 PM, Rebecca via agora-official wrote:
> I resolve the Agoran Decision for the election of the Prime Minister. The
> quorum was 7 voting system was IRV.
>
> First Preference Votes
>
> R. Lee (1): R. Lee
>
> ATMunn (3): Aris, Jason, ATMunn
>
> Nch (4): Falsifian, PSS, nch, Trigon
>
>
On 6/18/20 3:53 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> I moved the reports archive to the /docs folder in the Treasuror
> repository and added some jekyll stuff so that it would be a
> full-fledged site. But it's not going to work yet because it's still
> serving from the root of the maste
On 6/18/2020 9:38 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/18/20 12:31 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>
>> Fair's fair.
>>
>> I withdraw the proposal "UV Sunblock" from the pool.
>>
>> I submit the following Proposal, "UV-G Sunblock" AI-3, co=author ais523:
>> ---
On 6/18/20 12:31 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>
> Fair's fair.
>
> I withdraw the proposal "UV Sunblock" from the pool.
>
> I submit the following Proposal, "UV-G Sunblock" AI-3, co=author ais523:
>
>
> Amend
I moved the reports archive to the /docs folder in the Treasuror
repository and added some jekyll stuff so that it would be a
full-fledged site. But it's not going to work yet because it's still
serving from the root of the master branch. I need one of you Github
Owners go to the settings, then
well it's usually almost impossible to win the game another way
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 4:06 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/17/2020 8:08 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Thursday, 18 June 2020, 01:08:09 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> I award myself
46 matches
Mail list logo
