On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 20:37, ATMunn via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > Here's a proto-proposal I came up with somewhat on the spot. Opinions > welcome. > > > Title: The Deck > AI: 1.0 > Author: ATMunn > Co-author(s): > > Enact a power-1 rule entitled "The Deck" with the following text: > The Deck is an entity. The Deck CAN own Cards, but no other types of > assets. > > If the Deck owns at least one Card, any player CAN pay 10 coins to > Draw a Card. When a player does so, the Dealor CAN by announcement, > and SHALL in a timely fashion, transfer a Card from the Deck to the > player who Drew a Card. The Dealor SHALL make the choice of which > card to transfer randomly, with the probability of each type of Card > being exactly proportional to the number of that Card that the Deck > owns. Failure to use random chance in this transfer is the Class-2 > Crime of Stacking the Deck.
It seems ambiguous whether the probability of drawing a Justice card is proportional to the number of Justice Cards, or the probability of drawing *each* justice card is. (I'm pretty sure the former is what's intended.) I think changing "make the choice of which card" to "make the choice of which type of card" would fix the ambiguity. (Example: if the Deck owns a. Justice, b. Justice, c. Victory, then we don't want to say the distribution is 2/5, 2/5, 1/5.) > The Dealor's includes the card ownership of the Deck. a word (Also, the Treasuror already would need to report this. Does it help to have two officers reporting it?) - Falsifian
