> >> If the Rules define a fee-based mechanism to perform an action, but the > >> specified set of assets is the empty set, then the mechanism can be > >> invoked by announcement, but the announcement must include that there is > >> an (empty or 0) fee for the mechanism. > > I'm not sure if the meaning of "invoking" a mechanism/method is clear > > enough. What if we kept "then the action can be performed by > > announcement" here? I don't feel strongly; both versions seem vaguely > > fishy to me for different reasons. > > > > - Falsifian > > > Yeah, I knew the "invoke" phrasing was weird when I wrote it, and the > rules only define performing actions by announcement, not using methods > by announcement. The cleanest solution might be to just drop the > requirement of announcing a zero fee (or turn it into a SHOULD). > > -- > Jason Cobb
What would the text look like then? (I don't follow how the "invoke" phrasing relates to the requirement about specifying zero fee.) - Falsifian
