ehird wrote:
> I rebel! yaaar! What does rebellion do again?
Rule 2270, summary: when a player begins a coup:
a) The initiator is a rebel, the Speaker isn't, everyone else has
four days to become one (non-retractable)
b) The more rebels, the more likely the rebellion is to succeed
G. wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 15:12, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Kerim Aydin
>> wrote:
>> > I raise Taral's position on the list by 1, for a fee.
>> > I lower Wooble's position on the list by 1, for
ais523 wrote:
> the truth of the condition, the only conclusion is that it's undecidable
> whether or not alise managed to become inactive; unlike, say,
> registration where there's a requirement to be reasonably unambiguous,
Who's alise?
Wooble wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:57 AM, ais523 wrote:
>> CoE: The office of Notary does not exist, thus the document in question
>> is not a Notary's report. (CoE because it appears to purport to be an
>> asset report.)
>
> I'm not sure how to respond to this, because I clearly can't acc
Wooble wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> On 7 October 2010 13:46, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>>> If I'm not active, I become active. I intend, with 1 support, and
>>> conditional on this condition not being met, to become inactive.
>>
>> With 1 support (from ais523),
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 06:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> > > I bestow favours as follows:
> > > K.S. Supervisor - omd
> > > Justiciar - G.
> > > Grand Vizier - Wooble
> > > Head Gardener - coppro
> > > Crown Prince - ehird
On 10/07/2010 06:28 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Okay, sorry.
The Shuttle's Position is 6, as it has moved 6 times since last report
(when it was 0).
Isn't the Shuttle destroyed?
-coppro
On 8 October 2010 00:19, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 06:13 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>
>> On 7 October 2010 23:57, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 10/07/2010 05:23 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>
> On 7 October 2010 23:13, Sean Hunt
>>>
On 10/07/2010 06:13 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 7 October 2010 23:57, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 10/07/2010 05:23 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 7 October 2010 23:13, Sean Huntwrote:
I intend, with notice, to Bestow Favors.
-coppro
Can you do that?
On 10/07/2010 05:57 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Ship Computor Printout
All data is irrelevant as the journey is over and everything will be
created anew if another one is started.. The rules are unclear about
whether movement and stuff keeps happening after the journey is
finished; common sense s
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 05:23 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> > On 7 October 2010 23:13, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > > I intend, with notice, to Bestow Favors.
> > >
> > > -coppro
> > >
> > Can you do that?
> >
>
> I can intend to do anything.
>
> In fact, I intend, with
On 7 October 2010 23:23, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> I intend, with 3 support, to cause Space Alert to cease to be a
>> contest. Or has someone succeeded with this yet? Because last time I
>> didn't even get the support. If that's to be taken as people
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, John Smith wrote:
> CfJ:The second NoV quoted below is not valid
>
> Arguments: According to Rule 2230, "A NoV is valid if and only if... no
> previous valid NoV specified substantially identical information (i.e. the
> same violation for the same specific act)."
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> I intend, with 3 support, to cause Space Alert to cease to be a
> contest. Or has someone succeeded with this yet? Because last time I
> didn't even get the support. If that's to be taken as people actually
> wanting to play it, one of you'l
On 7 October 2010 23:13, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I intend, with notice, to Bestow Favors.
>
> -coppro
>
Can you do that?
--
-Tiger
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 7 October 2010 21:34, ais523 wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 15:30 -0400, omd wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> > Well, hey. I rebel.
> >>
> >> Me too.
> >
> > Note that if the rebellion fails, Tiger wins. Thus,
On 7 October 2010 23:05, ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 23:00 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> Only up to a certain point, right? If enough people do not rebel, the
>> small chance of being put really high (as one of few non-rebels)
>> outweighs the great probability of being put very low (
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 23:00 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Only up to a certain point, right? If enough people do not rebel, the
> small chance of being put really high (as one of few non-rebels)
> outweighs the great probability of being put very low (as the last of
> the rebels when everyone reb
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> > I publish an NoV, where the Accused is Sgeo, the allegedly illegal
> > action is when coppro changed eir nickname to "The Robot", the rule
> > allegedly broken is Rule 2215, and the power of the rule
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Elliott Hird wrote:
> I rebel! yaaar! What does rebellion do again?
It makes you shout "yaaar!"
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 15:12, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Kerim Aydin
> > wrote:
> > > I raise Taral's position on the list by 1, for a fee.
> > > I lower Woo
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 03:20 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 15:15 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > > For each elected office not held by Murphy, I resign that office.
> >
> > This requires With Notice, if it even works at all.
> >
> > I intend, with Notice,
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 15:30 -0400, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Well, hey. I rebel.
>
> Me too.
Note that if the rebellion fails, Tiger wins. Thus, it's in the
interests of most people to rebel (and as early as possible, to get a
better result from the act
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> For each elected office not held by Murphy, I resign that office.
Fails; you didn't give Notice.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:23 AM, ais523 wrote:
> Hmm, how did Quazie end up on the list? E was on coppro's most recent
> Herald report, but not any of the few before. (Did e end up with a Rest
> from a relatively recent NoV? I can't find any criminal cases against em
> in the CotC database.)
You
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 10:15 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I submit the following AI-1, II-0 proposal entitled "Refugitivize" and
> make it distributable:
>
> {
> WHEREAS on or about 17 Sept 2010, some moron in a hurry published a
> portion of the Herald's report listing on the Players who owned R
On 7 October 2010 14:55, ais523 wrote:
> Wooble's argument seems to be not that you don't believe the scam
> worked, but that you don't believe you became inactive.
How do you know I don't believe I became inactive? Sheesh! Just
because I SEEM to set you up...
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 14:49 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 7 October 2010 14:46, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > If you believe that it's UNDETERMINED whether you can perform the
> > action, you clearly don't believe it's TRUE that you can perform it.
> > Either it's not a scam or you're not being trut
On 7 October 2010 14:46, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> If you believe that it's UNDETERMINED whether you can perform the
> action, you clearly don't believe it's TRUE that you can perform it.
> Either it's not a scam or you're not being truthy.
I certainly *believe* it is true, I am just not certain, j
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 7 October 2010 14:35, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I publish an NoV alleging that ehird violated the Power-1 Rule 2215 by
>> making a statement e couldn't have reasonably believed to be true in
>> the above-quoted message.
>
> It's good to know
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2878
>
> === CFJ 2878 (Interest Index = 0)
>
> Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an
> unqualified public statement that is i
31 matches
Mail list logo
