On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Warrigal <ihope12...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I publish an NoV, where the Accused is Sgeo, the allegedly illegal
> > action is when coppro changed eir nickname to "The Robot", the rule
> > allegedly broken is Rule 2215, and the power of the rule allegedly
> > broken is 1.
> >
> > I publish an NoV, where the Accused is Taral, the allegedly illegal
> > action is when coppro changed eir nickname to "The Robot", the rule
> > allegedly broken is Rule 2215, and the power of the rule allegedly
> > broken is 1.
> >
> > I pay a fee to publish an NoV, where the Accused is Tiger, the
> > allegedly illegal action is when coppro changed eir nickname to "The
> > Robot", the rule allegedly broken is Rule 2215, and the power of the
> > rule allegedly broken is 1.
>
> I deputize for the Herald to announce that these are all valid and
> assign them IDs 85,86,87.
>
> I contest all 3.
All trivially NOT GUILTY should they go to trial, due to R1504(a):
(a) the Accused breached the specified rule via the specified
act;
-G.
