On 8 October 2010 00:19, Sean Hunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > On 10/07/2010 06:13 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >> >> On 7 October 2010 23:57, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: >>>> >>>> On 10/07/2010 05:23 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 7 October 2010 23:13, Sean Hunt<scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I intend, with notice, to Bestow Favors. >>>>>> >>>>>> -coppro >>>>>> >>>>> Can you do that? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I can intend to do anything. >>>> >>>> In fact, I intend, with notice, to cause Rule 101 to amend itself to say >>>> "coppro is The Agoran" at the end. >>> >>> It's not clear that you can do things With Notice that other officers can >>> only due without Objection. For example, you may need to do those both >>> with notice and without objection. >>> >>> Anyway, I recommend someone move em off the title of grand vizier. >>> >>> I'd do it but I won't have the ergs before the notice period ends. >>> >>> If someone moves me to grand vizier (cost: 5 ergs) I promise not to >>> use said powers until we judge whether a fix is needed. >>> >>> -G. >>> >> I hereby Bestow Favours! >> I want everyone currently in the highest positions of the list to stay >> there, in the same order, except coppro who should be just outside the >> range for a fancy title (or, I mean, the range of positions which I >> can put people on when Bestowing Favours.) So the one who's right >> below there shuffles one step up, and coppro shouldn't be Grand >> Vizier. Yeah. I bestow those favours. >> > INEFFECTIVE. > > -coppro > Oh, very well. Just the ambiguity or something else I'm missing?
-- -Tiger
