On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > On 7 October 2010 21:34, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 15:30 -0400, omd wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> > Well, hey. I rebel. > >> > >> Me too. > > > > Note that if the rebellion fails, Tiger wins. Thus, it's in the > > interests of most people to rebel (and as early as possible, to get a > > better result from the actual rebellion). > > > > -- > > ais523 > > Only up to a certain point, right? If enough people do not rebel, the > small chance of being put really high (as one of few non-rebels) > outweighs the great probability of being put very low (as the last of > the rebels when everyone rebels). Also if the rebellion succeeds, > someone else gets a leadership token. Sure, I'm close to winning but > this isn't a winning condition that sets anyone else back, so me > getting one isn't worse than anyone else getting one, assuming we're > planning on keeping them around for long enough to give most people a > decent chance of sometime getting three.
What, reasoned debate when we're trying to rile up the mobs? Yarrgh! Actually, a winning rebellion doesn't award a leadership token. As you haven't done a granting of favors yet, you could certainly bribe current non-rebels with high positions on the list! -G.
