Wooble wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:57 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> CoE: The office of Notary does not exist, thus the document in question >> is not a Notary's report. (CoE because it appears to purport to be an >> asset report.) > > I'm not sure how to respond to this, because I clearly can't accept it > and publish a corrected version of the Notary's report. I deny the > NoV on the basis that everything there that can self-ratify is > correct.
Any document can be the target of a CoE, whether or not any part of the message self-ratifies, and whether or not it's a report at all. The response I expected was "admitted, it wasn't a Notary's report".
